Feasibility of Using a Non-Counter Movement Squat to Assess Lower Body Strength in Adults Ages 20-70 years.

abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the Feasibility of Using a Non-Counter Movement Squat to Assess Lower Body Strength in Adults ages 20-70 years. Feasibility was tested by measuring five feasibility metrics described by Bowen et al. (Bowen et al., 2009): Acceptability, Demand, I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Stark, Alexander (Author)
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.54865
id ndltd-asu.edu-item-54865
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-asu.edu-item-548652019-11-07T03:01:02Z Feasibility of Using a Non-Counter Movement Squat to Assess Lower Body Strength in Adults Ages 20-70 years. abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the Feasibility of Using a Non-Counter Movement Squat to Assess Lower Body Strength in Adults ages 20-70 years. Feasibility was tested by measuring five feasibility metrics described by Bowen et al. (Bowen et al., 2009): Acceptability, Demand, Implementation, Practicality, and Limited Efficacy. Seven male subjects and fifteen female subjects participated in the study. The subjects had their height, weight, body fat percentage by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and grip strength measured. Subjects performed a warm-up on a cycle ergometer, a Non-Counter Movement Squat Test (NCMST) 1-repetition maximal strength test using a Smith machine, and a cool down on a treadmill. Each subject then completed a post-participation questionnaire used to measure acceptability, Demand was measured by subjects who agreed to participate, implementation was measured by subjects who completed the protocol, practicality was measured by an administrator survey, and limited efficacy was measured by distribution of strength results by age and for all subjects by sex. Results showed acceptance of hypotheses of acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality for both males and females. Limited efficacy was inconclusive for both males and females resulting in rejection of hypothesis. The findings of this study show that further research is needed to compare the NCMST to other lower body muscular strength tests to determine the validity of the NCMST. Dissertation/Thesis Stark, Alexander (Author) Ainsworth, Barbara (Advisor) Ofori, Edward (Committee member) Vezina, Jesse (Committee member) Marsit, Joseph (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Kinesiology Public health Dynapenia Feasibility Study Independent Living Lower body strength test Muscular Strength Sarcopenia eng 118 pages Masters Thesis Healthcare Innovation 2019 Masters Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.54865 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ 2019
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Kinesiology
Public health
Dynapenia
Feasibility Study
Independent Living
Lower body strength test
Muscular Strength
Sarcopenia
spellingShingle Kinesiology
Public health
Dynapenia
Feasibility Study
Independent Living
Lower body strength test
Muscular Strength
Sarcopenia
Feasibility of Using a Non-Counter Movement Squat to Assess Lower Body Strength in Adults Ages 20-70 years.
description abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the Feasibility of Using a Non-Counter Movement Squat to Assess Lower Body Strength in Adults ages 20-70 years. Feasibility was tested by measuring five feasibility metrics described by Bowen et al. (Bowen et al., 2009): Acceptability, Demand, Implementation, Practicality, and Limited Efficacy. Seven male subjects and fifteen female subjects participated in the study. The subjects had their height, weight, body fat percentage by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and grip strength measured. Subjects performed a warm-up on a cycle ergometer, a Non-Counter Movement Squat Test (NCMST) 1-repetition maximal strength test using a Smith machine, and a cool down on a treadmill. Each subject then completed a post-participation questionnaire used to measure acceptability, Demand was measured by subjects who agreed to participate, implementation was measured by subjects who completed the protocol, practicality was measured by an administrator survey, and limited efficacy was measured by distribution of strength results by age and for all subjects by sex. Results showed acceptance of hypotheses of acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality for both males and females. Limited efficacy was inconclusive for both males and females resulting in rejection of hypothesis. The findings of this study show that further research is needed to compare the NCMST to other lower body muscular strength tests to determine the validity of the NCMST. === Dissertation/Thesis === Masters Thesis Healthcare Innovation 2019
author2 Stark, Alexander (Author)
author_facet Stark, Alexander (Author)
title Feasibility of Using a Non-Counter Movement Squat to Assess Lower Body Strength in Adults Ages 20-70 years.
title_short Feasibility of Using a Non-Counter Movement Squat to Assess Lower Body Strength in Adults Ages 20-70 years.
title_full Feasibility of Using a Non-Counter Movement Squat to Assess Lower Body Strength in Adults Ages 20-70 years.
title_fullStr Feasibility of Using a Non-Counter Movement Squat to Assess Lower Body Strength in Adults Ages 20-70 years.
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of Using a Non-Counter Movement Squat to Assess Lower Body Strength in Adults Ages 20-70 years.
title_sort feasibility of using a non-counter movement squat to assess lower body strength in adults ages 20-70 years.
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.54865
_version_ 1719287556914282496