Three Essays in Economics
abstract: This dissertation presents three essays in economics. Firstly, I study the problem of allocating an indivisible good between two agents under incomplete information. I provide a characterization of mechanisms that maximize the sum of the expected utilities of the agents among all feasible...
Other Authors: | |
---|---|
Format: | Doctoral Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.9283 |
id |
ndltd-asu.edu-item-9283 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-asu.edu-item-92832018-06-22T03:01:53Z Three Essays in Economics abstract: This dissertation presents three essays in economics. Firstly, I study the problem of allocating an indivisible good between two agents under incomplete information. I provide a characterization of mechanisms that maximize the sum of the expected utilities of the agents among all feasible strategy-proof mechanisms: Any optimal mechanism must be a convex combination of two fixed price mechanisms and two option mechanisms. Secondly, I study the problem of allocating a non-excludable public good between two agents under incomplete information. An equal-cost sharing mechanism which maximizes the sum of the expected utilities of the agents among all feasible strategy-proof mechanisms is proved to be optimal. Under the equal-cost sharing mechanism, when the built cost is low, the public good is provided whenever one of the agents is willing to fund it at half cost; when the cost is high, the public good is provided only if both agents are willing to fund it. Thirdly, I analyze the problem of matching two heterogeneous populations. If the payoff from a match exhibits complementarities, it is well known that absent any friction positive assortative matching is optimal. Coarse matching refers to a situation in which the populations into a finite number of classes, then randomly matched within these classes. The focus of this essay is the performance of coarse matching schemes with a finite number of classes. The main results of this essay are the following ones. First, assuming a multiplicative match payoff function, I derive a lower bound on the performance of n-class coarse matching under mild conditions on the distributions of agents' characteristics. Second, I prove that this result generalizes to a large class of match payoff functions. Third, I show that these results are applicable to a broad class of applications, including a monopoly pricing problem with incomplete information, as well as to a cost-sharing problem with incomplete information. In these problems, standard models predict that optimal contracts sort types completely. The third result implies that a monopolist can capture a large fraction of the second-best profits by offering pooling contracts with a small number of qualities. Dissertation/Thesis Shao, Ran (Author) Manelli, Alejandro (Advisor) Chade, Hector (Advisor) Schlee, Edward (Committee member) Kovrijnykh, Natalia (Committee member) Arizona State University (Publisher) Economic Theory Auction Matching Mechanism Design eng 125 pages Ph.D. Economics 2011 Doctoral Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.9283 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ All Rights Reserved 2011 |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Doctoral Thesis |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Economic Theory Auction Matching Mechanism Design |
spellingShingle |
Economic Theory Auction Matching Mechanism Design Three Essays in Economics |
description |
abstract: This dissertation presents three essays in economics. Firstly, I study the problem of allocating an indivisible good between two agents under incomplete information. I provide a characterization of mechanisms that maximize the sum of the expected utilities of the agents among all feasible strategy-proof mechanisms: Any optimal mechanism must be a convex combination of two fixed price mechanisms and two option mechanisms. Secondly, I study the problem of allocating a non-excludable public good between two agents under incomplete information. An equal-cost sharing mechanism which maximizes the sum of the expected utilities of the agents among all feasible strategy-proof mechanisms is proved to be optimal. Under the equal-cost sharing mechanism, when the built cost is low, the public good is provided whenever one of the agents is willing to fund it at half cost; when the cost is high, the public good is provided only if both agents are willing to fund it. Thirdly, I analyze the problem of matching two heterogeneous populations. If the payoff from a match exhibits complementarities, it is well known that absent any friction positive assortative matching is optimal. Coarse matching refers to a situation in which the populations into a finite number of classes, then randomly matched within these classes. The focus of this essay is the performance of coarse matching schemes with a finite number of classes. The main results of this essay are the following ones. First, assuming a multiplicative match payoff function, I derive a lower bound on the performance of n-class coarse matching under mild conditions on the distributions of agents' characteristics. Second, I prove that this result generalizes to a large class of match payoff functions. Third, I show that these results are applicable to a broad class of applications, including a monopoly pricing problem with incomplete information, as well as to a cost-sharing problem with incomplete information. In these problems, standard models predict that optimal contracts sort types completely. The third result implies that a monopolist can capture a large fraction of the second-best profits by offering pooling contracts with a small number of qualities. === Dissertation/Thesis === Ph.D. Economics 2011 |
author2 |
Shao, Ran (Author) |
author_facet |
Shao, Ran (Author) |
title |
Three Essays in Economics |
title_short |
Three Essays in Economics |
title_full |
Three Essays in Economics |
title_fullStr |
Three Essays in Economics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Three Essays in Economics |
title_sort |
three essays in economics |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.9283 |
_version_ |
1718699668362231808 |