Children's use of analogy in reading and spelling

This thesis examines the role of analogy in the development of reading and spelling. Analogy is defined as using the spelling-sound pattern of one word (e.g. 'beak') to read or spell a word which shares a common orthographic sequence (e.g. 'bean' or 'peak'). Experiment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Goswami, Usha C.
Other Authors: Bryant, Peter
Published: University of Oxford 1986
Subjects:
150
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.376925
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-376925
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-3769252015-03-19T05:19:05ZChildren's use of analogy in reading and spellingGoswami, Usha C.Bryant, Peter1986This thesis examines the role of analogy in the development of reading and spelling. Analogy is defined as using the spelling-sound pattern of one word (e.g. 'beak') to read or spell a word which shares a common orthographic sequence (e.g. 'bean' or 'peak'). Experiment 1 shows that 6-7 year old children can use analogies when required to select the correct spellings of words which are read to them. Experiment 2 shows that children aged 5-7 years can also use analogies to read new words aloud. Experiment 3 shows that analogy is used in the same way by children at three different reading levels (non-readers, 6 years and 7 years). Experiment 4 shows that 5-7 year old children can also use analogies to spell new words. It is concluded that the use of analogy does not develop, as it is available from the very beginning of learning to read and spell. Experiments 5, 6 and 7 examine the effect of varying spelling-sound consistency on analogies. Children taught pairs of words consistent in spelling and sound (e.g. 'peak-leak') make more analogies in reading than children taught pairs of words consistent in spelling but inconsistent in sound (e.g. 'peak-steak'). This difference does not occur in spelling. It is concluded that spelling-sound consistency only affects children's use of analogies in reading. Experiment 8 shows that children also use analogies to read new words which they encounter in reading prose. This shows that analogy is not restricted to single word reading. Experiment 9 compares analogies between words written in the same case and in mixed case. It shows that analogy relies on orthographic rather than visual information. These results suggest that children should be taught to use analogies to read and spell new words. The broader educational implications of analogy are also discussed. Note. This thesis contains approximately 91,000 words.150Children : Books and reading : Analogy (Linguistics) : Spelling abilityUniversity of Oxfordhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.376925http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:9a46a5e3-8d4a-4208-82ff-97024f3971a7Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 150
Children : Books and reading : Analogy (Linguistics) : Spelling ability
spellingShingle 150
Children : Books and reading : Analogy (Linguistics) : Spelling ability
Goswami, Usha C.
Children's use of analogy in reading and spelling
description This thesis examines the role of analogy in the development of reading and spelling. Analogy is defined as using the spelling-sound pattern of one word (e.g. 'beak') to read or spell a word which shares a common orthographic sequence (e.g. 'bean' or 'peak'). Experiment 1 shows that 6-7 year old children can use analogies when required to select the correct spellings of words which are read to them. Experiment 2 shows that children aged 5-7 years can also use analogies to read new words aloud. Experiment 3 shows that analogy is used in the same way by children at three different reading levels (non-readers, 6 years and 7 years). Experiment 4 shows that 5-7 year old children can also use analogies to spell new words. It is concluded that the use of analogy does not develop, as it is available from the very beginning of learning to read and spell. Experiments 5, 6 and 7 examine the effect of varying spelling-sound consistency on analogies. Children taught pairs of words consistent in spelling and sound (e.g. 'peak-leak') make more analogies in reading than children taught pairs of words consistent in spelling but inconsistent in sound (e.g. 'peak-steak'). This difference does not occur in spelling. It is concluded that spelling-sound consistency only affects children's use of analogies in reading. Experiment 8 shows that children also use analogies to read new words which they encounter in reading prose. This shows that analogy is not restricted to single word reading. Experiment 9 compares analogies between words written in the same case and in mixed case. It shows that analogy relies on orthographic rather than visual information. These results suggest that children should be taught to use analogies to read and spell new words. The broader educational implications of analogy are also discussed. Note. This thesis contains approximately 91,000 words.
author2 Bryant, Peter
author_facet Bryant, Peter
Goswami, Usha C.
author Goswami, Usha C.
author_sort Goswami, Usha C.
title Children's use of analogy in reading and spelling
title_short Children's use of analogy in reading and spelling
title_full Children's use of analogy in reading and spelling
title_fullStr Children's use of analogy in reading and spelling
title_full_unstemmed Children's use of analogy in reading and spelling
title_sort children's use of analogy in reading and spelling
publisher University of Oxford
publishDate 1986
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.376925
work_keys_str_mv AT goswamiushac childrensuseofanalogyinreadingandspelling
_version_ 1716741109680439296