Understanding and assessing the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care

The clinician-patient relationship is at the core of community mental health care and impacts on outcome, but no instrument has been specifically developed for its assessmentE. xisting scalesh ave either unproven psychometric properties in community mental health care settings, or have been designed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McGurie-Snieckus, Rebecca
Published: Queen Mary, University of London 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.441969
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-441969
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4419692019-02-27T03:17:04ZUnderstanding and assessing the therapeutic relationship in community mental health careMcGurie-Snieckus, Rebecca2006The clinician-patient relationship is at the core of community mental health care and impacts on outcome, but no instrument has been specifically developed for its assessmentE. xisting scalesh ave either unproven psychometric properties in community mental health care settings, or have been designed for other therapeutic settings, or both. My aim in this thesis is to develop a scale to assess the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care (STAR) that has both clinician and patient versions. In part one, understanding the therapeutic relationship in community care, I considered the rationale for mental health care in the community and explore theoretical presuppositions, pre-existing measures, and influences on the therapeutic relationship. In part two, assessing the therapeutic relationship in community care, I developed an assessment tool in four stages. In stage one I generated an item pool using semi-structured interviews and existing scales. In stage two I administered this item pool to 133 community care patients and their 26 clinicians. I constructed subscales based on principal components analyses. In stage three, for final item selection, I assessed retest-reliability. In stage four the scales were administered to a new sample of 180 patients and their 84 clinicians. The factorial structure of the scale was confirmed with a good fit. The end result is both a patient and clinician version of STAR which has 12 items comprising 3 subscales: positive collaboration (6 items) and positive clinician input (3 items) in both versions, non-supportive clinician input in the patient version and emotional difficulties in the clinician version (3 items each). Psychometric properties are satisfactory. STAR is a specifically developed, brief scale to assess therapeutic relationships in community care. The two versions cover three similar factors each, and may be used in research and routine care.362.220723MedicineQueen Mary, University of Londonhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.441969http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/1773Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 362.220723
Medicine
spellingShingle 362.220723
Medicine
McGurie-Snieckus, Rebecca
Understanding and assessing the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care
description The clinician-patient relationship is at the core of community mental health care and impacts on outcome, but no instrument has been specifically developed for its assessmentE. xisting scalesh ave either unproven psychometric properties in community mental health care settings, or have been designed for other therapeutic settings, or both. My aim in this thesis is to develop a scale to assess the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care (STAR) that has both clinician and patient versions. In part one, understanding the therapeutic relationship in community care, I considered the rationale for mental health care in the community and explore theoretical presuppositions, pre-existing measures, and influences on the therapeutic relationship. In part two, assessing the therapeutic relationship in community care, I developed an assessment tool in four stages. In stage one I generated an item pool using semi-structured interviews and existing scales. In stage two I administered this item pool to 133 community care patients and their 26 clinicians. I constructed subscales based on principal components analyses. In stage three, for final item selection, I assessed retest-reliability. In stage four the scales were administered to a new sample of 180 patients and their 84 clinicians. The factorial structure of the scale was confirmed with a good fit. The end result is both a patient and clinician version of STAR which has 12 items comprising 3 subscales: positive collaboration (6 items) and positive clinician input (3 items) in both versions, non-supportive clinician input in the patient version and emotional difficulties in the clinician version (3 items each). Psychometric properties are satisfactory. STAR is a specifically developed, brief scale to assess therapeutic relationships in community care. The two versions cover three similar factors each, and may be used in research and routine care.
author McGurie-Snieckus, Rebecca
author_facet McGurie-Snieckus, Rebecca
author_sort McGurie-Snieckus, Rebecca
title Understanding and assessing the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care
title_short Understanding and assessing the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care
title_full Understanding and assessing the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care
title_fullStr Understanding and assessing the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care
title_full_unstemmed Understanding and assessing the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care
title_sort understanding and assessing the therapeutic relationship in community mental health care
publisher Queen Mary, University of London
publishDate 2006
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.441969
work_keys_str_mv AT mcguriesnieckusrebecca understandingandassessingthetherapeuticrelationshipincommunitymentalhealthcare
_version_ 1718983711949586432