Some aspects of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small instrumented catchment

The central theme of this research project was the investigation of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small area. The rainfall was measured over a 369 ha basin in East Devon by a network of forty-five inexpensive gauges installed at 30.5 cm. The accuracy of the rain gauges was evaluated and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richardson, E. J.
Published: University of Exeter 1976
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.470421
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-470421
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4704212017-12-24T15:12:07ZSome aspects of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small instrumented catchmentRichardson, E. J.1976The central theme of this research project was the investigation of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small area. The rainfall was measured over a 369 ha basin in East Devon by a network of forty-five inexpensive gauges installed at 30.5 cm. The accuracy of the rain gauges was evaluated and the systematic gauge error amounted to 6%. The gauge sampling error, or random error, of rainfall measurement was found to be approximately 4%. The rain gauge network revealed patterns of rainfall that varied considerably from storm event to storm event. The spatial variability of rainfall of the storms as expressed by the coefficient of variation exceeded 4.5% on all occasions and 10% on eighteen occasions. The variability was not simply due to systematic or random errors, even though the amounts of rainfall involved tended to be low; the range in rainfall (decile range) was no more than 4.0 mm for forty-two storm events. The storm rainfall amounts were related to various meteorological and topographical factors. The storms of convectional origin had a greater spatial variability than storms experiencing no convection and more clearly-defined rainfall gradients. Storms of Tropical air mass origin had a lower variability than storms of Arctic or Polar origin whilst Arctic storms had the greatest variability for low rainfall amounts. There was a tendency for storm rainfall to increase downwind particularly with the wind from a southerly direction, probably as a result of interaction with the topography. The degree of explanation of the spatial variation of storm rainfall afforded by the topographical variables of altitude, exposure and vegetation influence was low.551.577University of Exeterhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.470421Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 551.577
spellingShingle 551.577
Richardson, E. J.
Some aspects of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small instrumented catchment
description The central theme of this research project was the investigation of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small area. The rainfall was measured over a 369 ha basin in East Devon by a network of forty-five inexpensive gauges installed at 30.5 cm. The accuracy of the rain gauges was evaluated and the systematic gauge error amounted to 6%. The gauge sampling error, or random error, of rainfall measurement was found to be approximately 4%. The rain gauge network revealed patterns of rainfall that varied considerably from storm event to storm event. The spatial variability of rainfall of the storms as expressed by the coefficient of variation exceeded 4.5% on all occasions and 10% on eighteen occasions. The variability was not simply due to systematic or random errors, even though the amounts of rainfall involved tended to be low; the range in rainfall (decile range) was no more than 4.0 mm for forty-two storm events. The storm rainfall amounts were related to various meteorological and topographical factors. The storms of convectional origin had a greater spatial variability than storms experiencing no convection and more clearly-defined rainfall gradients. Storms of Tropical air mass origin had a lower variability than storms of Arctic or Polar origin whilst Arctic storms had the greatest variability for low rainfall amounts. There was a tendency for storm rainfall to increase downwind particularly with the wind from a southerly direction, probably as a result of interaction with the topography. The degree of explanation of the spatial variation of storm rainfall afforded by the topographical variables of altitude, exposure and vegetation influence was low.
author Richardson, E. J.
author_facet Richardson, E. J.
author_sort Richardson, E. J.
title Some aspects of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small instrumented catchment
title_short Some aspects of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small instrumented catchment
title_full Some aspects of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small instrumented catchment
title_fullStr Some aspects of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small instrumented catchment
title_full_unstemmed Some aspects of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small instrumented catchment
title_sort some aspects of the spatial variation of rainfall over a small instrumented catchment
publisher University of Exeter
publishDate 1976
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.470421
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsonej someaspectsofthespatialvariationofrainfalloverasmallinstrumentedcatchment
_version_ 1718566565838848000