Customer optimised design analysis : a metric based methodology for conceptual design analysis, selection and optimisation within new product development
The systematic creation of product designs that meet specification and are fit-forpurpose has resulted from intensive research investigation undertaken by Western European engineering design theorists, who define design science as four fundamental elements: Technical systems versus design processes...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Published: |
University of the West of England, Bristol
2008
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.486297 |
id |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-486297 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4862972015-03-20T03:41:47ZCustomer optimised design analysis : a metric based methodology for conceptual design analysis, selection and optimisation within new product developmentWoolley, Max2008The systematic creation of product designs that meet specification and are fit-forpurpose has resulted from intensive research investigation undertaken by Western European engineering design theorists, who define design science as four fundamental elements: Technical systems versus design processes and descriptive versus prescriptive statements. It is argued, through a comparison of the parallel emergent design process methodologies of Western European and Eastern Japanese industry, that a fifth element has evolved which should be included within the boundaries of design science - Quality. . The measure of how well new or variant product designs meet customer requirements is critical to the success of a product in a marketplace for which it is intended to compete. As the level of meeting or exceeding customer requirements defines the perceived quality of a design to the customer, it is paramount that design-quality is optimised to ensure maximum customer satisfaction. Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a dominant, established methodology which translates customer requirements into engineering characteristics. Although the approach is attributed to many well known successes, it also possesses some widely known limitations (subjective in nature; difficult to systematically compare concept design variants; difficult to consider complex design inter-relationships and design' conflicts; complexity of analysis increases proportionally with the size of the matrix; interpretation of matrix information requires high level of experience). Furthermore, although the richness of design information held within a QFD matrix provides a detailed record of design status, this information is' essentially static. To address these limitations, a design hypothesis is presented in which a metric-based theory of coupleddynamic- mapping of information held within the QFD design matrix provides a more sophisticated method of quality-by-design analysis. The hypothesis is tested through the creation of a novel hybrid design methodology- termed CODA (Customer Optimised Design Analysis). CODA methodology simultaneously provides an objective function of overall design merit that denotes optimal design attribute values that represents best design trade-off and optimal customer satisfaction (design quality). Finally, it is' deliberated how CODA is not meant to displace QFD, but to provide the design fraternity with a more sophisticated tool to resolve design conflict and aid decisionmaking within the conceptual design phase.338.0068University of the West of England, Bristolhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.486297Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
collection |
NDLTD |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
338.0068 |
spellingShingle |
338.0068 Woolley, Max Customer optimised design analysis : a metric based methodology for conceptual design analysis, selection and optimisation within new product development |
description |
The systematic creation of product designs that meet specification and are fit-forpurpose has resulted from intensive research investigation undertaken by Western European engineering design theorists, who define design science as four fundamental elements: Technical systems versus design processes and descriptive versus prescriptive statements. It is argued, through a comparison of the parallel emergent design process methodologies of Western European and Eastern Japanese industry, that a fifth element has evolved which should be included within the boundaries of design science - Quality. . The measure of how well new or variant product designs meet customer requirements is critical to the success of a product in a marketplace for which it is intended to compete. As the level of meeting or exceeding customer requirements defines the perceived quality of a design to the customer, it is paramount that design-quality is optimised to ensure maximum customer satisfaction. Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is a dominant, established methodology which translates customer requirements into engineering characteristics. Although the approach is attributed to many well known successes, it also possesses some widely known limitations (subjective in nature; difficult to systematically compare concept design variants; difficult to consider complex design inter-relationships and design' conflicts; complexity of analysis increases proportionally with the size of the matrix; interpretation of matrix information requires high level of experience). Furthermore, although the richness of design information held within a QFD matrix provides a detailed record of design status, this information is' essentially static. To address these limitations, a design hypothesis is presented in which a metric-based theory of coupleddynamic- mapping of information held within the QFD design matrix provides a more sophisticated method of quality-by-design analysis. The hypothesis is tested through the creation of a novel hybrid design methodology- termed CODA (Customer Optimised Design Analysis). CODA methodology simultaneously provides an objective function of overall design merit that denotes optimal design attribute values that represents best design trade-off and optimal customer satisfaction (design quality). Finally, it is' deliberated how CODA is not meant to displace QFD, but to provide the design fraternity with a more sophisticated tool to resolve design conflict and aid decisionmaking within the conceptual design phase. |
author |
Woolley, Max |
author_facet |
Woolley, Max |
author_sort |
Woolley, Max |
title |
Customer optimised design analysis : a metric based methodology for conceptual design analysis, selection and optimisation within new product development |
title_short |
Customer optimised design analysis : a metric based methodology for conceptual design analysis, selection and optimisation within new product development |
title_full |
Customer optimised design analysis : a metric based methodology for conceptual design analysis, selection and optimisation within new product development |
title_fullStr |
Customer optimised design analysis : a metric based methodology for conceptual design analysis, selection and optimisation within new product development |
title_full_unstemmed |
Customer optimised design analysis : a metric based methodology for conceptual design analysis, selection and optimisation within new product development |
title_sort |
customer optimised design analysis : a metric based methodology for conceptual design analysis, selection and optimisation within new product development |
publisher |
University of the West of England, Bristol |
publishDate |
2008 |
url |
http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.486297 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT woolleymax customeroptimiseddesignanalysisametricbasedmethodologyforconceptualdesignanalysisselectionandoptimisationwithinnewproductdevelopment |
_version_ |
1716782135063347200 |