A comparison of Gujarati Asian and Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis

This study examined Gujarati and Caucasian patients with RA, with respect to disease activity, genetic factors, treatment, socioeconomic and psychological status.;61 Gujarati and 61 Caucasian subjects underwent a structured interview, including detailed social history, disease history, drug history,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Neville, Catherine Ellen
Published: University of Leicester 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.492815
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-492815
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-4928152016-12-08T03:24:38ZA comparison of Gujarati Asian and Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritisNeville, Catherine Ellen2008This study examined Gujarati and Caucasian patients with RA, with respect to disease activity, genetic factors, treatment, socioeconomic and psychological status.;61 Gujarati and 61 Caucasian subjects underwent a structured interview, including detailed social history, disease history, drug history, pain on VAS, HAQ, WHO Self Reporting Questionnaire, list of Threatening Life Events and an examination including a swollen joint count.;Caucasian patients had higher swollen joint counts (10.39 vs. 8.07, p=0.05), more nodulosis (46% vs. 16%, p=0.0005) and more sero-positivity for RF (66% vs. 45%, p=0.02). Gujaratis had longer EMS (1.36 hrs vs. 0.86 hrs, p=0.03), greater pain on VAS (5.1 vs. 3.7, p=0.0008) and greater disability on HAQ (1.9 vs. 1.2, p=0.0001). Gujaratis had an earlier age of onset (42.0 yrs vs. 46.3 years, p=0.01). There were no differences in DMARD therapy, but Gujaratis perceived their treatment to be less effective (p=0.0009). 76% of patients had tried complementary therapies.;Gujarati patients had a lower frequency of HLA DRB1 shared epitope (0.77 vs. 1.12 copies/patient, p=0.01). Caucasians expressed HLA DRB1*04 (37% vs. 12%, p=0.001) and DRB1*01 (15% vs. 1% p=0.0007). Gujaratis expressed HLA DRB1*10 (21% vs. 3%, p=0.0009).;59% Gujaratis were not working because of ill health, compared with 31% Caucasians. Gujaratis had a larger social network (3.15 vs. 1.89, p=0.0004) and more social services support (75% vs. 54%, p=0.01). 44% Gujarati patients were vegetarian, and few dark or smoked. Gujarati patients were significantly depressed (9.44 vs. 5.16 on SRQ, p<0.0001), and ethnicity was an independent risk factor for depression (p<0.0005) when other variables were adjusted for.;Ethnicity was an independent predictor for disability (p=0.001) despite adjusting for markers of disease severity and activity. Asian patients had an odds ratio of 8.20 (p=0.006) of having a HAQ >=2. Ethnicity was not a predictor for SJC.616.7227University of Leicesterhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.492815http://hdl.handle.net/2381/29541Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 616.7227
spellingShingle 616.7227
Neville, Catherine Ellen
A comparison of Gujarati Asian and Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis
description This study examined Gujarati and Caucasian patients with RA, with respect to disease activity, genetic factors, treatment, socioeconomic and psychological status.;61 Gujarati and 61 Caucasian subjects underwent a structured interview, including detailed social history, disease history, drug history, pain on VAS, HAQ, WHO Self Reporting Questionnaire, list of Threatening Life Events and an examination including a swollen joint count.;Caucasian patients had higher swollen joint counts (10.39 vs. 8.07, p=0.05), more nodulosis (46% vs. 16%, p=0.0005) and more sero-positivity for RF (66% vs. 45%, p=0.02). Gujaratis had longer EMS (1.36 hrs vs. 0.86 hrs, p=0.03), greater pain on VAS (5.1 vs. 3.7, p=0.0008) and greater disability on HAQ (1.9 vs. 1.2, p=0.0001). Gujaratis had an earlier age of onset (42.0 yrs vs. 46.3 years, p=0.01). There were no differences in DMARD therapy, but Gujaratis perceived their treatment to be less effective (p=0.0009). 76% of patients had tried complementary therapies.;Gujarati patients had a lower frequency of HLA DRB1 shared epitope (0.77 vs. 1.12 copies/patient, p=0.01). Caucasians expressed HLA DRB1*04 (37% vs. 12%, p=0.001) and DRB1*01 (15% vs. 1% p=0.0007). Gujaratis expressed HLA DRB1*10 (21% vs. 3%, p=0.0009).;59% Gujaratis were not working because of ill health, compared with 31% Caucasians. Gujaratis had a larger social network (3.15 vs. 1.89, p=0.0004) and more social services support (75% vs. 54%, p=0.01). 44% Gujarati patients were vegetarian, and few dark or smoked. Gujarati patients were significantly depressed (9.44 vs. 5.16 on SRQ, p<0.0001), and ethnicity was an independent risk factor for depression (p<0.0005) when other variables were adjusted for.;Ethnicity was an independent predictor for disability (p=0.001) despite adjusting for markers of disease severity and activity. Asian patients had an odds ratio of 8.20 (p=0.006) of having a HAQ >=2. Ethnicity was not a predictor for SJC.
author Neville, Catherine Ellen
author_facet Neville, Catherine Ellen
author_sort Neville, Catherine Ellen
title A comparison of Gujarati Asian and Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_short A comparison of Gujarati Asian and Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full A comparison of Gujarati Asian and Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr A comparison of Gujarati Asian and Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of Gujarati Asian and Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort comparison of gujarati asian and caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis
publisher University of Leicester
publishDate 2008
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.492815
work_keys_str_mv AT nevillecatherineellen acomparisonofgujaratiasianandcaucasianpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
AT nevillecatherineellen comparisonofgujaratiasianandcaucasianpatientswithrheumatoidarthritis
_version_ 1718400265598533632