Strategic formulation processes : an institutional perspective

My research addresses the question of 'how does the institutional context impact on the individual framing of strategic issues'. These early stages of decision making represent an important area of study, setting the foundations for the latter stages of decision-making. I show that althoug...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dudley, Paul
Other Authors: Johnson, Gerry ; Balogun, Julia
Published: Cranfield University 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.512860
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-512860
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5128602018-05-12T03:24:47ZStrategic formulation processes : an institutional perspectiveDudley, PaulJohnson, Gerry ; Balogun, Julia2003My research addresses the question of 'how does the institutional context impact on the individual framing of strategic issues'. These early stages of decision making represent an important area of study, setting the foundations for the latter stages of decision-making. I show that although both the problem formulation and strategic issue diagnosis literatures have increased our understanding of these formative stages, neither has adequately addressed how 'institutional forces' impact on the individual framing of strategic issues. My research applies an institutional perspective, drawing on Barley & Tolbert (1997) and their work on 'scripted behaviours' to address this. Institutionalists highlight the institutional context, represented by powerful social and symbolic forces that influence organisations, their practices and behaviours of individual actors through the enactment of scripts. A naturalistic approach, incorporating the use of semi-structured interviews was applied. Respondents were drawn from two universities: Alpha & Beta, possessing membership of multiple institutions: academia and law, academia and accountancy. So, the research sought to understand the role of multiple institutions on the framing of strategic issues. It was established that scripts are widely shared within the institutional settings, playing a pivotal role in the framing of strategic issues (representative of top-down institutional processes being at play) but do not operate in isolation. I draw on the work of Bartunek (1984) to further ground the second inter-related concept described in my thesis as 'meanings'. These enable respondents to interpret institutionally defined scripts, indicative of bottom-up institutional processes also being at play. Several contributions are made, firstly to the strategic issue and problem formulation literatures and secondly to the institutional literature by focusing on micro-institutional processes.658.4012Cranfield Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.512860http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/4428Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 658.4012
spellingShingle 658.4012
Dudley, Paul
Strategic formulation processes : an institutional perspective
description My research addresses the question of 'how does the institutional context impact on the individual framing of strategic issues'. These early stages of decision making represent an important area of study, setting the foundations for the latter stages of decision-making. I show that although both the problem formulation and strategic issue diagnosis literatures have increased our understanding of these formative stages, neither has adequately addressed how 'institutional forces' impact on the individual framing of strategic issues. My research applies an institutional perspective, drawing on Barley & Tolbert (1997) and their work on 'scripted behaviours' to address this. Institutionalists highlight the institutional context, represented by powerful social and symbolic forces that influence organisations, their practices and behaviours of individual actors through the enactment of scripts. A naturalistic approach, incorporating the use of semi-structured interviews was applied. Respondents were drawn from two universities: Alpha & Beta, possessing membership of multiple institutions: academia and law, academia and accountancy. So, the research sought to understand the role of multiple institutions on the framing of strategic issues. It was established that scripts are widely shared within the institutional settings, playing a pivotal role in the framing of strategic issues (representative of top-down institutional processes being at play) but do not operate in isolation. I draw on the work of Bartunek (1984) to further ground the second inter-related concept described in my thesis as 'meanings'. These enable respondents to interpret institutionally defined scripts, indicative of bottom-up institutional processes also being at play. Several contributions are made, firstly to the strategic issue and problem formulation literatures and secondly to the institutional literature by focusing on micro-institutional processes.
author2 Johnson, Gerry ; Balogun, Julia
author_facet Johnson, Gerry ; Balogun, Julia
Dudley, Paul
author Dudley, Paul
author_sort Dudley, Paul
title Strategic formulation processes : an institutional perspective
title_short Strategic formulation processes : an institutional perspective
title_full Strategic formulation processes : an institutional perspective
title_fullStr Strategic formulation processes : an institutional perspective
title_full_unstemmed Strategic formulation processes : an institutional perspective
title_sort strategic formulation processes : an institutional perspective
publisher Cranfield University
publishDate 2003
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.512860
work_keys_str_mv AT dudleypaul strategicformulationprocessesaninstitutionalperspective
_version_ 1718637287553630208