'Smoking to forget' : the impact of prolonged smoking on prospective memory

Prospective memory (PM) refers to remembering to remember and is essential for everyday living. Although recent research has focused upon PM deficits associated with recreational drug use, very little research to date has focused on smoking and PM. This thesis had four aims. Firstly, to verify wheth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: O'Neill, Terence
Other Authors: Heffernan, Tom
Published: Northumbria University 2010
Subjects:
155
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.537329
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-537329
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5373292015-03-20T04:47:27Z'Smoking to forget' : the impact of prolonged smoking on prospective memoryO'Neill, TerenceHeffernan, Tom2010Prospective memory (PM) refers to remembering to remember and is essential for everyday living. Although recent research has focused upon PM deficits associated with recreational drug use, very little research to date has focused on smoking and PM. This thesis had four aims. Firstly, to verify whether PM deficits are associated with prolonged smoking could be replicated. Secondly, to observe whether such smoking-related deficits extended to objective measures of PM. Thirdly, to assess what effect, if any, abstinence from smoking had upon PM. Fourthly, to ascertain whether there was any difference in PM performance between regular (daily) smokers and social (binge) smokers. Participants were drawn primarily from undergraduates in North East universities. Studies 1–3 in this thesis studied self-reports and objective measures of PM in smokers, previous smokers and non-smokers. Across all three studies no consistent findings were observed on self-reported PM reflecting deficits associated with smoking, but smokers performed worse on the objective measures of PM than non-smokers, with previous smokers falling between the other two groups – suggesting that smokers’ PM is impaired and that those who stopped smoking appeared to recover a proportion of their PM function. Study 4 revealed smokers’ poor performance on objective tasks was not confounded by their being in a state of withdrawal. Studies 5 and 6 explored whether any difference was observed between ‘social’ (binge) smokers and ‘regular’ (daily) smokers on PM performance. Studies 5 and 6 found no difference between social and regular smokers on a video-based, nor a real-world PM task. Overall, it was concluded that self-reports of PM do not provide consistent findings (first aim), lowered PM performance on objective measures are associated with prolonged smoking (second aim), previous smokers show some recovery of PM function (third aim) and that the pattern of smoking does not affect PM performance in smokers’ (fourth aim).155C800 PsychologyNorthumbria Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.537329http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/572/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 155
C800 Psychology
spellingShingle 155
C800 Psychology
O'Neill, Terence
'Smoking to forget' : the impact of prolonged smoking on prospective memory
description Prospective memory (PM) refers to remembering to remember and is essential for everyday living. Although recent research has focused upon PM deficits associated with recreational drug use, very little research to date has focused on smoking and PM. This thesis had four aims. Firstly, to verify whether PM deficits are associated with prolonged smoking could be replicated. Secondly, to observe whether such smoking-related deficits extended to objective measures of PM. Thirdly, to assess what effect, if any, abstinence from smoking had upon PM. Fourthly, to ascertain whether there was any difference in PM performance between regular (daily) smokers and social (binge) smokers. Participants were drawn primarily from undergraduates in North East universities. Studies 1–3 in this thesis studied self-reports and objective measures of PM in smokers, previous smokers and non-smokers. Across all three studies no consistent findings were observed on self-reported PM reflecting deficits associated with smoking, but smokers performed worse on the objective measures of PM than non-smokers, with previous smokers falling between the other two groups – suggesting that smokers’ PM is impaired and that those who stopped smoking appeared to recover a proportion of their PM function. Study 4 revealed smokers’ poor performance on objective tasks was not confounded by their being in a state of withdrawal. Studies 5 and 6 explored whether any difference was observed between ‘social’ (binge) smokers and ‘regular’ (daily) smokers on PM performance. Studies 5 and 6 found no difference between social and regular smokers on a video-based, nor a real-world PM task. Overall, it was concluded that self-reports of PM do not provide consistent findings (first aim), lowered PM performance on objective measures are associated with prolonged smoking (second aim), previous smokers show some recovery of PM function (third aim) and that the pattern of smoking does not affect PM performance in smokers’ (fourth aim).
author2 Heffernan, Tom
author_facet Heffernan, Tom
O'Neill, Terence
author O'Neill, Terence
author_sort O'Neill, Terence
title 'Smoking to forget' : the impact of prolonged smoking on prospective memory
title_short 'Smoking to forget' : the impact of prolonged smoking on prospective memory
title_full 'Smoking to forget' : the impact of prolonged smoking on prospective memory
title_fullStr 'Smoking to forget' : the impact of prolonged smoking on prospective memory
title_full_unstemmed 'Smoking to forget' : the impact of prolonged smoking on prospective memory
title_sort 'smoking to forget' : the impact of prolonged smoking on prospective memory
publisher Northumbria University
publishDate 2010
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.537329
work_keys_str_mv AT oneillterence smokingtoforgettheimpactofprolongedsmokingonprospectivememory
_version_ 1716786345903390720