The relationship between encoding and recall for the identities and locations of objects

Five experiments are reported which investigated the relationship between the number of fixations that participants made on objects in a photograph of a visual scene and the memory that participants exhibited for the identities and locations of those objects. The results of Experiment 1 showed that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Corck-Adelman, David
Other Authors: Liversedge, Simon
Published: University of Southampton 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.543433
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-543433
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5434332018-09-05T03:26:22ZThe relationship between encoding and recall for the identities and locations of objectsCorck-Adelman, DavidLiversedge, Simon2011Five experiments are reported which investigated the relationship between the number of fixations that participants made on objects in a photograph of a visual scene and the memory that participants exhibited for the identities and locations of those objects. The results of Experiment 1 showed that there is a very close relationship between encoding and recall for both the identities and locations of objects, and provided evidence that information about identities and locations of objects might be encoded differently. Specifically, the data suggested that object identities were encoded across multiple fixations, thereby accumulating in memory across separate fixations. However, object locations were encoded accurately after the first fixation on an object and did not appear to improve significantly with subsequent fixations. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the relationship between encoding and recall can be influenced using a lower-level attentional capture technique to draw. Experiment 3 investigated whether a primacy or recency effect was found for object identity and location memory. No such evidence was obtained for either. Experiment 4 provided evidence that information about the overall configuration of objects was encoded without the need for each object to be directly fixated. Experiments 4 and 5 both found that objects must be fixated for their specific location to be encoded, but also provided some suggestive evidence that object location memory might also accumulate across fixations (though to a lesser extent than for object identity memory). Hollingworth and experimental work. Modifications to this model were proposed to account for the current findings. In conclusion, the five experiments provide significant insight into encoding processes associated with memory for the identities and locations of objects150.724BF PsychologyUniversity of Southamptonhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.543433https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/208329/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 150.724
BF Psychology
spellingShingle 150.724
BF Psychology
Corck-Adelman, David
The relationship between encoding and recall for the identities and locations of objects
description Five experiments are reported which investigated the relationship between the number of fixations that participants made on objects in a photograph of a visual scene and the memory that participants exhibited for the identities and locations of those objects. The results of Experiment 1 showed that there is a very close relationship between encoding and recall for both the identities and locations of objects, and provided evidence that information about identities and locations of objects might be encoded differently. Specifically, the data suggested that object identities were encoded across multiple fixations, thereby accumulating in memory across separate fixations. However, object locations were encoded accurately after the first fixation on an object and did not appear to improve significantly with subsequent fixations. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the relationship between encoding and recall can be influenced using a lower-level attentional capture technique to draw. Experiment 3 investigated whether a primacy or recency effect was found for object identity and location memory. No such evidence was obtained for either. Experiment 4 provided evidence that information about the overall configuration of objects was encoded without the need for each object to be directly fixated. Experiments 4 and 5 both found that objects must be fixated for their specific location to be encoded, but also provided some suggestive evidence that object location memory might also accumulate across fixations (though to a lesser extent than for object identity memory). Hollingworth and experimental work. Modifications to this model were proposed to account for the current findings. In conclusion, the five experiments provide significant insight into encoding processes associated with memory for the identities and locations of objects
author2 Liversedge, Simon
author_facet Liversedge, Simon
Corck-Adelman, David
author Corck-Adelman, David
author_sort Corck-Adelman, David
title The relationship between encoding and recall for the identities and locations of objects
title_short The relationship between encoding and recall for the identities and locations of objects
title_full The relationship between encoding and recall for the identities and locations of objects
title_fullStr The relationship between encoding and recall for the identities and locations of objects
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between encoding and recall for the identities and locations of objects
title_sort relationship between encoding and recall for the identities and locations of objects
publisher University of Southampton
publishDate 2011
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.543433
work_keys_str_mv AT corckadelmandavid therelationshipbetweenencodingandrecallfortheidentitiesandlocationsofobjects
AT corckadelmandavid relationshipbetweenencodingandrecallfortheidentitiesandlocationsofobjects
_version_ 1718729533366992896