In search of a timeless God

In contemporary discussions it is often assumed that God cannot be timeless if presentism is true, but that God can be timeless if four-dimensional eternalism is true. I argue that the Christian God cannot be timeless on either ontology of time. Contemporary atemporalists have not fully grasped the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mullins, Ryan
Other Authors: Torrance, Alan J.
Published: University of St Andrews 2013
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.574843
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-574843
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5748432015-03-20T03:25:41ZIn search of a timeless GodMullins, RyanTorrance, Alan J.2013In contemporary discussions it is often assumed that God cannot be timeless if presentism is true, but that God can be timeless if four-dimensional eternalism is true. I argue that the Christian God cannot be timeless on either ontology of time. Contemporary atemporalists have not fully grasped the details of eternalism, nor fleshed out the implications of eternalism for understanding the Christian doctrines of creation, conservation, and incarnation. Once the details are developed, it can be shown that eternalism is not compatible with divine timelessness. Instead, the Christian God would be temporal as understood on eternalism. In order to demonstrate this, I shall do the following in this thesis. In chapter 1 I shall lay out the relevant desiderata and methods for assessing the doctrine of divine timelessness. Chapter 2 will give an up-to-date discussion of the philosophy of time, and lay out the theories that are needed to understand the doctrine of divine timelessness. Chapter 3 will articulate the traditional doctrine of divine timelessness and develop its systematic connections to the doctrines of divine immutability and simplicity. Chapter 4 shall argue that the classical Christian theologians were committed to presentism. It shall also argue that their commitment to presentism conflicts with their commitment to divine timelessness and omniscience. In chapter 5 I shall argue that classical Christian theology cannot reconcile divine timelessness with their doctrines of creation and conservation. In chapter 6, it will be shown how four-dimensional eternalism can help Christian theology solve some of these problems for divine timelessness. However, it will also be argued that four-dimensional eternalism conflicts with Christian theology, and that four-dimensional eternalism is not compatible with divine timelessness. Chapter 7 offers a thorough examination of the doctrine of the incarnation. It is argued that divine timelessness is not compatible with the incarnation.University of St Andrewshttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.574843http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3736Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description In contemporary discussions it is often assumed that God cannot be timeless if presentism is true, but that God can be timeless if four-dimensional eternalism is true. I argue that the Christian God cannot be timeless on either ontology of time. Contemporary atemporalists have not fully grasped the details of eternalism, nor fleshed out the implications of eternalism for understanding the Christian doctrines of creation, conservation, and incarnation. Once the details are developed, it can be shown that eternalism is not compatible with divine timelessness. Instead, the Christian God would be temporal as understood on eternalism. In order to demonstrate this, I shall do the following in this thesis. In chapter 1 I shall lay out the relevant desiderata and methods for assessing the doctrine of divine timelessness. Chapter 2 will give an up-to-date discussion of the philosophy of time, and lay out the theories that are needed to understand the doctrine of divine timelessness. Chapter 3 will articulate the traditional doctrine of divine timelessness and develop its systematic connections to the doctrines of divine immutability and simplicity. Chapter 4 shall argue that the classical Christian theologians were committed to presentism. It shall also argue that their commitment to presentism conflicts with their commitment to divine timelessness and omniscience. In chapter 5 I shall argue that classical Christian theology cannot reconcile divine timelessness with their doctrines of creation and conservation. In chapter 6, it will be shown how four-dimensional eternalism can help Christian theology solve some of these problems for divine timelessness. However, it will also be argued that four-dimensional eternalism conflicts with Christian theology, and that four-dimensional eternalism is not compatible with divine timelessness. Chapter 7 offers a thorough examination of the doctrine of the incarnation. It is argued that divine timelessness is not compatible with the incarnation.
author2 Torrance, Alan J.
author_facet Torrance, Alan J.
Mullins, Ryan
author Mullins, Ryan
spellingShingle Mullins, Ryan
In search of a timeless God
author_sort Mullins, Ryan
title In search of a timeless God
title_short In search of a timeless God
title_full In search of a timeless God
title_fullStr In search of a timeless God
title_full_unstemmed In search of a timeless God
title_sort in search of a timeless god
publisher University of St Andrews
publishDate 2013
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.574843
work_keys_str_mv AT mullinsryan insearchofatimelessgod
_version_ 1716780942406713344