Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation

This work demonstrates the significance of Karl Barth’s Christology by analyzing it in the context of his orientation toward the classical tradition – an orientation that was both critical and sympathetic. To compare this Christology with the doctrine’s history I argue that the Chalcedonian portrait...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sumner, Darren O.
Published: University of Aberdeen 2012
Subjects:
200
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.575389
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-575389
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5753892015-12-03T04:01:00ZKarl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnationSumner, Darren O.2012This work demonstrates the significance of Karl Barth’s Christology by analyzing it in the context of his orientation toward the classical tradition – an orientation that was both critical and sympathetic. To compare this Christology with the doctrine’s history I argue that the Chalcedonian portrait of the incarnation is conceptually vulnerable at a number of points. By recasting the doctrine in actualist terms – the history of Jesus’ lived existence as God’s fulfillment of His covenant with creatures, rather than a metaphysical uniting of ‘natures’ – Barth is able to move beyond problems inherent in the tradition. Yet, despite formal and material differences, Barth’s position coheres with the intent of the ancient councils and ought to be judged as orthodox. His great contribution to Christology is in the unapologetic affirmation of ‘the humanity of God.’200University of Aberdeenhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.575389http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk:80/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=196001Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 200
spellingShingle 200
Sumner, Darren O.
Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation
description This work demonstrates the significance of Karl Barth’s Christology by analyzing it in the context of his orientation toward the classical tradition – an orientation that was both critical and sympathetic. To compare this Christology with the doctrine’s history I argue that the Chalcedonian portrait of the incarnation is conceptually vulnerable at a number of points. By recasting the doctrine in actualist terms – the history of Jesus’ lived existence as God’s fulfillment of His covenant with creatures, rather than a metaphysical uniting of ‘natures’ – Barth is able to move beyond problems inherent in the tradition. Yet, despite formal and material differences, Barth’s position coheres with the intent of the ancient councils and ought to be judged as orthodox. His great contribution to Christology is in the unapologetic affirmation of ‘the humanity of God.’
author Sumner, Darren O.
author_facet Sumner, Darren O.
author_sort Sumner, Darren O.
title Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation
title_short Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation
title_full Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation
title_fullStr Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation
title_full_unstemmed Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation
title_sort karl barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation
publisher University of Aberdeen
publishDate 2012
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.575389
work_keys_str_mv AT sumnerdarreno karlbarthscriticalappropriationofthedoctrineoftheincarnation
_version_ 1718143410395676672