Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation
This work demonstrates the significance of Karl Barth’s Christology by analyzing it in the context of his orientation toward the classical tradition – an orientation that was both critical and sympathetic. To compare this Christology with the doctrine’s history I argue that the Chalcedonian portrait...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Published: |
University of Aberdeen
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.575389 |
id |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-575389 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5753892015-12-03T04:01:00ZKarl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnationSumner, Darren O.2012This work demonstrates the significance of Karl Barth’s Christology by analyzing it in the context of his orientation toward the classical tradition – an orientation that was both critical and sympathetic. To compare this Christology with the doctrine’s history I argue that the Chalcedonian portrait of the incarnation is conceptually vulnerable at a number of points. By recasting the doctrine in actualist terms – the history of Jesus’ lived existence as God’s fulfillment of His covenant with creatures, rather than a metaphysical uniting of ‘natures’ – Barth is able to move beyond problems inherent in the tradition. Yet, despite formal and material differences, Barth’s position coheres with the intent of the ancient councils and ought to be judged as orthodox. His great contribution to Christology is in the unapologetic affirmation of ‘the humanity of God.’200University of Aberdeenhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.575389http://digitool.abdn.ac.uk:80/webclient/DeliveryManager?pid=196001Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
collection |
NDLTD |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
200 |
spellingShingle |
200 Sumner, Darren O. Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation |
description |
This work demonstrates the significance of Karl Barth’s Christology by analyzing it in the context of his orientation toward the classical tradition – an orientation that was both critical and sympathetic. To compare this Christology with the doctrine’s history I argue that the Chalcedonian portrait of the incarnation is conceptually vulnerable at a number of points. By recasting the doctrine in actualist terms – the history of Jesus’ lived existence as God’s fulfillment of His covenant with creatures, rather than a metaphysical uniting of ‘natures’ – Barth is able to move beyond problems inherent in the tradition. Yet, despite formal and material differences, Barth’s position coheres with the intent of the ancient councils and ought to be judged as orthodox. His great contribution to Christology is in the unapologetic affirmation of ‘the humanity of God.’ |
author |
Sumner, Darren O. |
author_facet |
Sumner, Darren O. |
author_sort |
Sumner, Darren O. |
title |
Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation |
title_short |
Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation |
title_full |
Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation |
title_fullStr |
Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation |
title_sort |
karl barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of the incarnation |
publisher |
University of Aberdeen |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.575389 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sumnerdarreno karlbarthscriticalappropriationofthedoctrineoftheincarnation |
_version_ |
1718143410395676672 |