Philopoemen : a study in Hellenistic history

The basis of the work is an examination of the ancient source material, in particular plutarch's 'Life of Philopoemen' and the fragments of polybius' Histories which deal with the Achaean League. An outline of the resultant interpretation of philopoemen's career is as follow...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Errington, R. M.
Published: Durham University 1965
Subjects:
880
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.578121
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-578121
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5781212015-03-20T04:50:13ZPhilopoemen : a study in Hellenistic historyErrington, R. M.1965The basis of the work is an examination of the ancient source material, in particular plutarch's 'Life of Philopoemen' and the fragments of polybius' Histories which deal with the Achaean League. An outline of the resultant interpretation of philopoemen's career is as follows. Until 222 B. C. he took no part in Achaean politics, but was involved solely with megalopolis. Between 222 and 211 philopoemen was in Crete representing the interests of Philip V of Macedon, from 210 to 200 in Achaea, where after attaining a military independence, of Macedonia with Philips encouragement, he used this attempt to join Rome. Defeated on this issue, in 200 he returned to Crete to help the Gortynians, Achean allies. In his absence his friend Aristaenus carried his policy and joined Achaea to Rome. On Philopoemen's return in 194 he first desired to cooperate with Flamininus; but when he discovered that flamininus was merely using Achaea for Roman policy Philopoemen began to press the letter of the law of the Achaean foedus with Rome at First misunderstanding , but finally exploiting Achaean olientela. He refused Rome any right of interference in Peloponnesian matters, although he himself was unable to find satisfactory solutions to many of the Achaens' problems, particularly those associated with exiles from Sparta and Messene. The Roman Senate, bound by its conventions could find no way round the impasse until after Philopoen's death in 182, when his party lost most of its influence in Achaea. This interplay of policies and purposes of the Senate and Philopoemen is worked out in the detail. The concluding chapter traces the developing weakness of his party after his death and attempts to correct some modern interpretation of Poybius' judgement of Philopoemen and his policies. Appendicies deal with source problems in the Achaean strategos list - and other pertinent problems.880Durham Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.578121http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7983/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 880
spellingShingle 880
Errington, R. M.
Philopoemen : a study in Hellenistic history
description The basis of the work is an examination of the ancient source material, in particular plutarch's 'Life of Philopoemen' and the fragments of polybius' Histories which deal with the Achaean League. An outline of the resultant interpretation of philopoemen's career is as follows. Until 222 B. C. he took no part in Achaean politics, but was involved solely with megalopolis. Between 222 and 211 philopoemen was in Crete representing the interests of Philip V of Macedon, from 210 to 200 in Achaea, where after attaining a military independence, of Macedonia with Philips encouragement, he used this attempt to join Rome. Defeated on this issue, in 200 he returned to Crete to help the Gortynians, Achean allies. In his absence his friend Aristaenus carried his policy and joined Achaea to Rome. On Philopoemen's return in 194 he first desired to cooperate with Flamininus; but when he discovered that flamininus was merely using Achaea for Roman policy Philopoemen began to press the letter of the law of the Achaean foedus with Rome at First misunderstanding , but finally exploiting Achaean olientela. He refused Rome any right of interference in Peloponnesian matters, although he himself was unable to find satisfactory solutions to many of the Achaens' problems, particularly those associated with exiles from Sparta and Messene. The Roman Senate, bound by its conventions could find no way round the impasse until after Philopoen's death in 182, when his party lost most of its influence in Achaea. This interplay of policies and purposes of the Senate and Philopoemen is worked out in the detail. The concluding chapter traces the developing weakness of his party after his death and attempts to correct some modern interpretation of Poybius' judgement of Philopoemen and his policies. Appendicies deal with source problems in the Achaean strategos list - and other pertinent problems.
author Errington, R. M.
author_facet Errington, R. M.
author_sort Errington, R. M.
title Philopoemen : a study in Hellenistic history
title_short Philopoemen : a study in Hellenistic history
title_full Philopoemen : a study in Hellenistic history
title_fullStr Philopoemen : a study in Hellenistic history
title_full_unstemmed Philopoemen : a study in Hellenistic history
title_sort philopoemen : a study in hellenistic history
publisher Durham University
publishDate 1965
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.578121
work_keys_str_mv AT erringtonrm philopoemenastudyinhellenistichistory
_version_ 1716786921712123904