Perceptions of Scotland's primary teachers' preparedness for making assessment judgments

This research, set in the context of primary schooling in Scotland, set out to explore different stakeholders' perceptions of the extent to which teachers are prepared for making dependable assessment judgments in primary schools; this 'preparedness' referring collectively to factors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wharton, Elizabeth Jane
Published: Queen's University Belfast 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.580116
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-580116
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5801162015-03-20T04:52:47ZPerceptions of Scotland's primary teachers' preparedness for making assessment judgmentsWharton, Elizabeth Jane2012This research, set in the context of primary schooling in Scotland, set out to explore different stakeholders' perceptions of the extent to which teachers are prepared for making dependable assessment judgments in primary schools; this 'preparedness' referring collectively to factors that serve to support teachers' assessment practice. The study examined the national assessment system; the quality assurance of teacher judgments; perceptions of trust; the provision of continuous professional development activities; assessment for monitoring purposes; and self-evaluation among the various actors. Using questionnaires, focus groups and interviews ,data was collected from teachers, headteachers, and senior personnel within local authorities throughout Scotland. The design of the local authority interviews was based on the data gathered from the various teacher responses and was designed to draw out a local authority perspective on the same matters. The overall results suggest that there are teachers who feel that they have not been fully supported in delivering dependable assessment judgments, with particular reference to a perceived pressure to test children in order to meet targets. There is evidence to suggest that the pressure to meet or exceed targets goes beyond schools to local authority level. The results also suggest that teachers do not feel that their assessments are afforded a high level of trust by all stakeholders. The quality assurance procedures used within local authorities had not been communicated to all of the teachers in the surveys, and there was little evidence of effective and sustained moderation activity. The Scottish Survey of Achievement (SSA), the national monitoring sampling system, appears not to have engaged teachers nor fully met the accountability needs of the local authorities. There also appears to be growing interest in the use of standardised assessment for accountability purposes.372.1102Queen's University Belfasthttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.580116Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 372.1102
spellingShingle 372.1102
Wharton, Elizabeth Jane
Perceptions of Scotland's primary teachers' preparedness for making assessment judgments
description This research, set in the context of primary schooling in Scotland, set out to explore different stakeholders' perceptions of the extent to which teachers are prepared for making dependable assessment judgments in primary schools; this 'preparedness' referring collectively to factors that serve to support teachers' assessment practice. The study examined the national assessment system; the quality assurance of teacher judgments; perceptions of trust; the provision of continuous professional development activities; assessment for monitoring purposes; and self-evaluation among the various actors. Using questionnaires, focus groups and interviews ,data was collected from teachers, headteachers, and senior personnel within local authorities throughout Scotland. The design of the local authority interviews was based on the data gathered from the various teacher responses and was designed to draw out a local authority perspective on the same matters. The overall results suggest that there are teachers who feel that they have not been fully supported in delivering dependable assessment judgments, with particular reference to a perceived pressure to test children in order to meet targets. There is evidence to suggest that the pressure to meet or exceed targets goes beyond schools to local authority level. The results also suggest that teachers do not feel that their assessments are afforded a high level of trust by all stakeholders. The quality assurance procedures used within local authorities had not been communicated to all of the teachers in the surveys, and there was little evidence of effective and sustained moderation activity. The Scottish Survey of Achievement (SSA), the national monitoring sampling system, appears not to have engaged teachers nor fully met the accountability needs of the local authorities. There also appears to be growing interest in the use of standardised assessment for accountability purposes.
author Wharton, Elizabeth Jane
author_facet Wharton, Elizabeth Jane
author_sort Wharton, Elizabeth Jane
title Perceptions of Scotland's primary teachers' preparedness for making assessment judgments
title_short Perceptions of Scotland's primary teachers' preparedness for making assessment judgments
title_full Perceptions of Scotland's primary teachers' preparedness for making assessment judgments
title_fullStr Perceptions of Scotland's primary teachers' preparedness for making assessment judgments
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions of Scotland's primary teachers' preparedness for making assessment judgments
title_sort perceptions of scotland's primary teachers' preparedness for making assessment judgments
publisher Queen's University Belfast
publishDate 2012
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.580116
work_keys_str_mv AT whartonelizabethjane perceptionsofscotlandsprimaryteacherspreparednessformakingassessmentjudgments
_version_ 1716787449995198464