Cardinality optimization problems

In this thesis, we discuss the cardinality minimization problem (CMP) and the cardinality constraint problem. Due to the NP-hardness of these problems, we discuss different computational and relaxation techniques for finding an approximate solution to these problems. We also discuss the l\(_1\)-mini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdi, Mohammad Javad
Published: University of Birmingham 2013
Subjects:
510
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.583150
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-583150
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5831502019-04-03T06:36:35ZCardinality optimization problemsAbdi, Mohammad Javad2013In this thesis, we discuss the cardinality minimization problem (CMP) and the cardinality constraint problem. Due to the NP-hardness of these problems, we discuss different computational and relaxation techniques for finding an approximate solution to these problems. We also discuss the l\(_1\)-minimization as one of the most efficient methods for solving CMPs, and we demonstrate that the l\(_1\)-minimization uses a kind of weighted l\(_2\)-minimization. We show that the reweighted l\(_j\)-minimization (j≥1) is very effective to locate a sparse solution to a linear system. Next, we show how to introduce different merit functions for sparsity, and how proper weights may reduce the gap between the performances of these functions for finding a sparse solution to an undetermined linear system. Furthermore, we introduce some effective computational approaches to locate a sparse solution for an underdetermined linear system. These approaches are based on reweighted l\(_j\)-minimization (j≥1) algorithms. We focus on the reweighted l\(_1\)-minimization, and introduce several new concave approximations to the l\(_0\)-norm function. These approximations can be employed to define new weights for reweighted l\(_1\)-minimization algorithms. We show how the change of parameters in reweighted algorithms may affect the performance of the algorithms for finding the solution of the cardinality minimization problem. In our experiments, the problem data were generated according to different statistical distributions, and we test the algorithms on different sparsity level of the solution of the problem. As a special case of cardinality constrained problems, we also discuss compressed sensing, restricted isometry property (RIP), and restricted isometry constant (RIC).510QA MathematicsUniversity of Birminghamhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.583150http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/4620/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 510
QA Mathematics
spellingShingle 510
QA Mathematics
Abdi, Mohammad Javad
Cardinality optimization problems
description In this thesis, we discuss the cardinality minimization problem (CMP) and the cardinality constraint problem. Due to the NP-hardness of these problems, we discuss different computational and relaxation techniques for finding an approximate solution to these problems. We also discuss the l\(_1\)-minimization as one of the most efficient methods for solving CMPs, and we demonstrate that the l\(_1\)-minimization uses a kind of weighted l\(_2\)-minimization. We show that the reweighted l\(_j\)-minimization (j≥1) is very effective to locate a sparse solution to a linear system. Next, we show how to introduce different merit functions for sparsity, and how proper weights may reduce the gap between the performances of these functions for finding a sparse solution to an undetermined linear system. Furthermore, we introduce some effective computational approaches to locate a sparse solution for an underdetermined linear system. These approaches are based on reweighted l\(_j\)-minimization (j≥1) algorithms. We focus on the reweighted l\(_1\)-minimization, and introduce several new concave approximations to the l\(_0\)-norm function. These approximations can be employed to define new weights for reweighted l\(_1\)-minimization algorithms. We show how the change of parameters in reweighted algorithms may affect the performance of the algorithms for finding the solution of the cardinality minimization problem. In our experiments, the problem data were generated according to different statistical distributions, and we test the algorithms on different sparsity level of the solution of the problem. As a special case of cardinality constrained problems, we also discuss compressed sensing, restricted isometry property (RIP), and restricted isometry constant (RIC).
author Abdi, Mohammad Javad
author_facet Abdi, Mohammad Javad
author_sort Abdi, Mohammad Javad
title Cardinality optimization problems
title_short Cardinality optimization problems
title_full Cardinality optimization problems
title_fullStr Cardinality optimization problems
title_full_unstemmed Cardinality optimization problems
title_sort cardinality optimization problems
publisher University of Birmingham
publishDate 2013
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.583150
work_keys_str_mv AT abdimohammadjavad cardinalityoptimizationproblems
_version_ 1719013518153351168