Rome and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities, 44-31 BC : a study of political relations during civil war

This thesis presents a critical analysis of the political relations between Rome on the one hand and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities on the other hand during the age of civil war from 44 until 31 BC. In contrast to previous studies of Rome’s foreign affairs in the eastern Mediterranean glan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Van-Wijlick, Hendrikus Antonius Margar
Published: Durham University 2013
Subjects:
930
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.586119
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-586119
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-5861192015-12-03T03:47:56ZRome and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities, 44-31 BC : a study of political relations during civil warVan-Wijlick, Hendrikus Antonius Margar2013This thesis presents a critical analysis of the political relations between Rome on the one hand and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities on the other hand during the age of civil war from 44 until 31 BC. In contrast to previous studies of Rome’s foreign affairs in the eastern Mediterranean glancing over this era as a result of their focus on longer periods of time during the Republic or Principate, this work yields a unique insight into the workings of Rome’s interstate dealings during a time of internal upheaval. By looking at each bilateral relationship separately both from the perspective of Rome and the kingdom or principality, it shows first and foremost the wide variety in political dealings between representatives of Roman power and Near Eastern rulers. Yet, in spite of this diversity, issues such as the political dependency of Near Eastern kings and other dynasts on Rome show that there are also some common characteristics about the relations. Ever since Pompey reorganised the eastern Mediterranean, Rome interfered on a regular basis in the internal administration and the foreign affairs of the kingdoms and principalities in the Near East. A notable exception in this case formed Parthia, the only realm that could measure up to Rome. The thesis also investigates to what extent the conduct of Rome and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities towards one another in the period from 44 until 31 was typical for this period. Drawing upon examples from earlier eras, it shows that to a large degree the behaviour of Rome and Near Eastern realms in our age of civil war was not typical and manifests continuity with earlier periods. It thus presents a prima facie case for the re-examination of prevailing views on the specificities of Rome and the civil war in relation to international relations of the period.930Durham Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.586119http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9387/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 930
spellingShingle 930
Van-Wijlick, Hendrikus Antonius Margar
Rome and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities, 44-31 BC : a study of political relations during civil war
description This thesis presents a critical analysis of the political relations between Rome on the one hand and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities on the other hand during the age of civil war from 44 until 31 BC. In contrast to previous studies of Rome’s foreign affairs in the eastern Mediterranean glancing over this era as a result of their focus on longer periods of time during the Republic or Principate, this work yields a unique insight into the workings of Rome’s interstate dealings during a time of internal upheaval. By looking at each bilateral relationship separately both from the perspective of Rome and the kingdom or principality, it shows first and foremost the wide variety in political dealings between representatives of Roman power and Near Eastern rulers. Yet, in spite of this diversity, issues such as the political dependency of Near Eastern kings and other dynasts on Rome show that there are also some common characteristics about the relations. Ever since Pompey reorganised the eastern Mediterranean, Rome interfered on a regular basis in the internal administration and the foreign affairs of the kingdoms and principalities in the Near East. A notable exception in this case formed Parthia, the only realm that could measure up to Rome. The thesis also investigates to what extent the conduct of Rome and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities towards one another in the period from 44 until 31 was typical for this period. Drawing upon examples from earlier eras, it shows that to a large degree the behaviour of Rome and Near Eastern realms in our age of civil war was not typical and manifests continuity with earlier periods. It thus presents a prima facie case for the re-examination of prevailing views on the specificities of Rome and the civil war in relation to international relations of the period.
author Van-Wijlick, Hendrikus Antonius Margar
author_facet Van-Wijlick, Hendrikus Antonius Margar
author_sort Van-Wijlick, Hendrikus Antonius Margar
title Rome and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities, 44-31 BC : a study of political relations during civil war
title_short Rome and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities, 44-31 BC : a study of political relations during civil war
title_full Rome and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities, 44-31 BC : a study of political relations during civil war
title_fullStr Rome and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities, 44-31 BC : a study of political relations during civil war
title_full_unstemmed Rome and Near Eastern kingdoms and principalities, 44-31 BC : a study of political relations during civil war
title_sort rome and near eastern kingdoms and principalities, 44-31 bc : a study of political relations during civil war
publisher Durham University
publishDate 2013
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.586119
work_keys_str_mv AT vanwijlickhendrikusantoniusmargar romeandneareasternkingdomsandprincipalities4431bcastudyofpoliticalrelationsduringcivilwar
_version_ 1718143070777638912