Phytosociology and community boundaries of the British heath formation
A review of phytosociological techniques, including the Zurich-Montipellier (Z-M) system. Association analysis and simple ordination is made, using a standard data set. The complementary nature of the results obtained is noted. As classification erects divisions and boundaries in a data set, and the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Published: |
Durham University
1970
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.600895 |
id |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-600895 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6008952016-02-03T03:20:50ZPhytosociology and community boundaries of the British heath formationBridgewater, P.1970A review of phytosociological techniques, including the Zurich-Montipellier (Z-M) system. Association analysis and simple ordination is made, using a standard data set. The complementary nature of the results obtained is noted. As classification erects divisions and boundaries in a data set, and the prime method used in the analysis of heath vegetation is classificatory, evidence for the prescence of 'real' vegetation boundaries is presented, together with a discussion of their nature and function. Heathland vegetation in Britain has been classified using the Z-M phytosociological system, and four main types have been distinguished, which are equated with alliances at present in use in Europe. These are; Erica cinerea Heath: Ulicion nanae (Duvigud, 1944)em. Van den Bergen. Calluna vulgaris Heath: Calluno-Genisition pilosae (Duvignd, 1944) Vaccinium myrtillus Heath: Llyrtillion bore ale (Bocher, 1943). Erica tetralix Heath: Ericion tetralicis (Schuick, 1933).The first three are typical of Dry heaths, whereas the fourth indicates wet heath. A phytogeographical analysis of the Heath vegetation gives further validity to these four types, indicating the dependence of the three dry 'Heaths' on species which are geographically restricted. Use of the Z-M system and some other techniques to indicate the nature of recent vegetation in areas now urbanised or agriculturalised is made, using South Gloucestershire as such an area.581Durham Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.600895http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/9690/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation |
collection |
NDLTD |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
581 |
spellingShingle |
581 Bridgewater, P. Phytosociology and community boundaries of the British heath formation |
description |
A review of phytosociological techniques, including the Zurich-Montipellier (Z-M) system. Association analysis and simple ordination is made, using a standard data set. The complementary nature of the results obtained is noted. As classification erects divisions and boundaries in a data set, and the prime method used in the analysis of heath vegetation is classificatory, evidence for the prescence of 'real' vegetation boundaries is presented, together with a discussion of their nature and function. Heathland vegetation in Britain has been classified using the Z-M phytosociological system, and four main types have been distinguished, which are equated with alliances at present in use in Europe. These are; Erica cinerea Heath: Ulicion nanae (Duvigud, 1944)em. Van den Bergen. Calluna vulgaris Heath: Calluno-Genisition pilosae (Duvignd, 1944) Vaccinium myrtillus Heath: Llyrtillion bore ale (Bocher, 1943). Erica tetralix Heath: Ericion tetralicis (Schuick, 1933).The first three are typical of Dry heaths, whereas the fourth indicates wet heath. A phytogeographical analysis of the Heath vegetation gives further validity to these four types, indicating the dependence of the three dry 'Heaths' on species which are geographically restricted. Use of the Z-M system and some other techniques to indicate the nature of recent vegetation in areas now urbanised or agriculturalised is made, using South Gloucestershire as such an area. |
author |
Bridgewater, P. |
author_facet |
Bridgewater, P. |
author_sort |
Bridgewater, P. |
title |
Phytosociology and community boundaries of the British heath formation |
title_short |
Phytosociology and community boundaries of the British heath formation |
title_full |
Phytosociology and community boundaries of the British heath formation |
title_fullStr |
Phytosociology and community boundaries of the British heath formation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Phytosociology and community boundaries of the British heath formation |
title_sort |
phytosociology and community boundaries of the british heath formation |
publisher |
Durham University |
publishDate |
1970 |
url |
http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.600895 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bridgewaterp phytosociologyandcommunityboundariesofthebritishheathformation |
_version_ |
1718176886652141568 |