Evaluation of a National Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Programme (NHS Health Check)

Background: The NHS Health Check, the largest systematic cardiovascular disease (CVD) primary prevention programme globally, aims to reduce CVD burden and health inequalities by assessing and managing CVD risk among 40 to 74 year old individuals without existing vascular diseases. I evaluated the im...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Artac, Macide
Other Authors: Millett, Christopher; Majeed, Azeem
Published: Imperial College London 2013
Subjects:
614
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.656493
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-656493
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6564932015-12-03T03:46:50ZEvaluation of a National Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Programme (NHS Health Check)Artac, MacideMillett, Christopher; Majeed, Azeem2013Background: The NHS Health Check, the largest systematic cardiovascular disease (CVD) primary prevention programme globally, aims to reduce CVD burden and health inequalities by assessing and managing CVD risk among 40 to 74 year old individuals without existing vascular diseases. I evaluated the impact of the programme at local and national levels. Methods: Using electronic medical record data from general practices in Hammersmith and Fulham, I assessed CVD risk factor recording before the programme, the programme uptake in the first two years and the impact of the programme on CVD risk. National coverage of the programme in one financial year was assessed using data from Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). Results: There was good recording of smoking status (86.1%) and blood pressure (82.5%), with lower BMI (59.5%) and cholesterol (47.5%) recording among Health Check eligible patients before the programme in Hammersmith and Fulham. Uptake of the Health Check was lower than the national target (75%) at 39.2% among patients with an estimated high CVD risk, but matched the national required rate at 20.0% among all remaining eligible patients. There was significant reduction in mean global CVD risk score (28.2% to 26.2%) after one year among patients with estimated high risk that had a complete Health Check. The programme uptake was higher in patients living in more deprived areas among those not at estimated high risk (adjusted odds ratio = 0.88 (0.73-106)). Mean national coverage of the programme was lower (8.1%) than anticipated (18%), with large PCT-level variation (0% to 29.8%). Coverage was significantly greater in PCTs in more deprived areas (coefficient = -0.51 (-1.88-0.00), p-value: 0.035). Conclusions: Population-wide impact of the NHS Health Check may be limited by poor uptake of the programme. This and other limitations to the programme suggest that a targeted screening approach along with population-wide strategies may be a better option for more cost-effective prevention of CVD.614Imperial College Londonhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.656493http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/24725Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 614
spellingShingle 614
Artac, Macide
Evaluation of a National Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Programme (NHS Health Check)
description Background: The NHS Health Check, the largest systematic cardiovascular disease (CVD) primary prevention programme globally, aims to reduce CVD burden and health inequalities by assessing and managing CVD risk among 40 to 74 year old individuals without existing vascular diseases. I evaluated the impact of the programme at local and national levels. Methods: Using electronic medical record data from general practices in Hammersmith and Fulham, I assessed CVD risk factor recording before the programme, the programme uptake in the first two years and the impact of the programme on CVD risk. National coverage of the programme in one financial year was assessed using data from Primary Care Trusts (PCTs). Results: There was good recording of smoking status (86.1%) and blood pressure (82.5%), with lower BMI (59.5%) and cholesterol (47.5%) recording among Health Check eligible patients before the programme in Hammersmith and Fulham. Uptake of the Health Check was lower than the national target (75%) at 39.2% among patients with an estimated high CVD risk, but matched the national required rate at 20.0% among all remaining eligible patients. There was significant reduction in mean global CVD risk score (28.2% to 26.2%) after one year among patients with estimated high risk that had a complete Health Check. The programme uptake was higher in patients living in more deprived areas among those not at estimated high risk (adjusted odds ratio = 0.88 (0.73-106)). Mean national coverage of the programme was lower (8.1%) than anticipated (18%), with large PCT-level variation (0% to 29.8%). Coverage was significantly greater in PCTs in more deprived areas (coefficient = -0.51 (-1.88-0.00), p-value: 0.035). Conclusions: Population-wide impact of the NHS Health Check may be limited by poor uptake of the programme. This and other limitations to the programme suggest that a targeted screening approach along with population-wide strategies may be a better option for more cost-effective prevention of CVD.
author2 Millett, Christopher; Majeed, Azeem
author_facet Millett, Christopher; Majeed, Azeem
Artac, Macide
author Artac, Macide
author_sort Artac, Macide
title Evaluation of a National Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Programme (NHS Health Check)
title_short Evaluation of a National Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Programme (NHS Health Check)
title_full Evaluation of a National Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Programme (NHS Health Check)
title_fullStr Evaluation of a National Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Programme (NHS Health Check)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a National Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Programme (NHS Health Check)
title_sort evaluation of a national cardiovascular risk assessment programme (nhs health check)
publisher Imperial College London
publishDate 2013
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.656493
work_keys_str_mv AT artacmacide evaluationofanationalcardiovascularriskassessmentprogrammenhshealthcheck
_version_ 1718143165972611072