The obligation aut dedere aut judicare ('extradite or prosecute') in international law : scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation 'extradite or prosecute'

The thesis focuses on the scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation aut dedere aut judicare pertaining to certain international crimes such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, the prohibition of torture, drug trafficking, hijacking of civil aviation and terrorist bomb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Panov, Stoyan Minkov
Published: University of Birmingham 2016
Subjects:
341
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.681120
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-681120
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6811202019-04-03T06:39:16ZThe obligation aut dedere aut judicare ('extradite or prosecute') in international law : scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation 'extradite or prosecute'Panov, Stoyan Minkov2016The thesis focuses on the scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation aut dedere aut judicare pertaining to certain international crimes such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, the prohibition of torture, drug trafficking, hijacking of civil aviation and terrorist bombing and financing of terrorism in international law. The general framework of the thesis focuses on the legal base of the obligation aut dedere aut judicare, the scope and content of the obligation, the triggering mechanisms of the duty, and state responsibility for preaches of the obligation. The relevant core crimes and transnational crimes are examined in relation to the obligation, based on and formulated in various multilateral, widely-ratified conventions and state practice. State practice and opinio juris indicate that a customary aut dedere aut judicare duty has formed or crystallized for certain international crimes such as the prohibition of torture, genocide, grave breaches of international humanitarian law, including war crimes, and crimes against humanity. As regards the offences against the safety of civil aviation and hijacking, terrorism-related crimes, international drug trafficking, and crimes against UN personnel, the evidence is mixed and it is more appropriate to conclude that an emerging custom of the obligation 'extradite-or-prosecute' for these crimes is forming.341K Law (General)University of Birminghamhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.681120http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/6521/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 341
K Law (General)
spellingShingle 341
K Law (General)
Panov, Stoyan Minkov
The obligation aut dedere aut judicare ('extradite or prosecute') in international law : scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation 'extradite or prosecute'
description The thesis focuses on the scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation aut dedere aut judicare pertaining to certain international crimes such as genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, the prohibition of torture, drug trafficking, hijacking of civil aviation and terrorist bombing and financing of terrorism in international law. The general framework of the thesis focuses on the legal base of the obligation aut dedere aut judicare, the scope and content of the obligation, the triggering mechanisms of the duty, and state responsibility for preaches of the obligation. The relevant core crimes and transnational crimes are examined in relation to the obligation, based on and formulated in various multilateral, widely-ratified conventions and state practice. State practice and opinio juris indicate that a customary aut dedere aut judicare duty has formed or crystallized for certain international crimes such as the prohibition of torture, genocide, grave breaches of international humanitarian law, including war crimes, and crimes against humanity. As regards the offences against the safety of civil aviation and hijacking, terrorism-related crimes, international drug trafficking, and crimes against UN personnel, the evidence is mixed and it is more appropriate to conclude that an emerging custom of the obligation 'extradite-or-prosecute' for these crimes is forming.
author Panov, Stoyan Minkov
author_facet Panov, Stoyan Minkov
author_sort Panov, Stoyan Minkov
title The obligation aut dedere aut judicare ('extradite or prosecute') in international law : scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation 'extradite or prosecute'
title_short The obligation aut dedere aut judicare ('extradite or prosecute') in international law : scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation 'extradite or prosecute'
title_full The obligation aut dedere aut judicare ('extradite or prosecute') in international law : scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation 'extradite or prosecute'
title_fullStr The obligation aut dedere aut judicare ('extradite or prosecute') in international law : scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation 'extradite or prosecute'
title_full_unstemmed The obligation aut dedere aut judicare ('extradite or prosecute') in international law : scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation 'extradite or prosecute'
title_sort obligation aut dedere aut judicare ('extradite or prosecute') in international law : scope, content, sources and applicability of the obligation 'extradite or prosecute'
publisher University of Birmingham
publishDate 2016
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.681120
work_keys_str_mv AT panovstoyanminkov theobligationautdedereautjudicareextraditeorprosecuteininternationallawscopecontentsourcesandapplicabilityoftheobligationextraditeorprosecute
AT panovstoyanminkov obligationautdedereautjudicareextraditeorprosecuteininternationallawscopecontentsourcesandapplicabilityoftheobligationextraditeorprosecute
_version_ 1719013653131296768