The impact of regulation, ownership arrangements, and management culture on risk management practices within the water industry

Although the specifics of water utility ownership, regulation and management culture have been explored in terms of their impact on economic and customer value, there has been little meaningful engagement with their influence on the risk environment and risk management. Using a two phase case study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Allan, Richard
Other Authors: Jeffrey, Paul ; Pollard, Simon
Published: Cranfield University 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.681446
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-681446
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6814462017-08-30T03:19:45ZThe impact of regulation, ownership arrangements, and management culture on risk management practices within the water industryAllan, RichardJeffrey, Paul ; Pollard, Simon2015Although the specifics of water utility ownership, regulation and management culture have been explored in terms of their impact on economic and customer value, there has been little meaningful engagement with their influence on the risk environment and risk management. Using a two phase case study approach as the primary source of information, this thesis asks what are the particular features of regulation, ownership arrangements and management culture which influence risk management, and what are the implications of these relationships in the context of ambitions for resilient organizations? In addressing these queries, the thesis considers the mindful choices and adjustments a utility must make to its risk management strategy to manage strategic tensions between efficiency, risk and delivery of safe drinking water. The case studies expose a tension between the ambition of the water service providers` strategic objectives to provide safe drinking water and the priority that executives place on corporate financial health. This leads to the conclusion that public health risk rankings need re-evaluation in relation to financial risks. There was no evidence to demonstrate that public health risk mitigation had been costed and evaluated against the strategic objectives of the studied organisations. Furthermore, the nature of risk conversations varied within organisations, changing the meaning of risk vertically within the business. A proposed model for the reporting of risk tolerance and risk appetite with respect to mitigating public health risk is the result. Such approaches to risk reporting and costing will support water authorities in meeting corporate aspirations to become ‘high reliability’ services while retaining the capacity to out-perform financial and service level targets, irrespective of regulation, ownership arrangements or management culture.363.6Cranfield Universityhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.681446http://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/9718Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 363.6
spellingShingle 363.6
Allan, Richard
The impact of regulation, ownership arrangements, and management culture on risk management practices within the water industry
description Although the specifics of water utility ownership, regulation and management culture have been explored in terms of their impact on economic and customer value, there has been little meaningful engagement with their influence on the risk environment and risk management. Using a two phase case study approach as the primary source of information, this thesis asks what are the particular features of regulation, ownership arrangements and management culture which influence risk management, and what are the implications of these relationships in the context of ambitions for resilient organizations? In addressing these queries, the thesis considers the mindful choices and adjustments a utility must make to its risk management strategy to manage strategic tensions between efficiency, risk and delivery of safe drinking water. The case studies expose a tension between the ambition of the water service providers` strategic objectives to provide safe drinking water and the priority that executives place on corporate financial health. This leads to the conclusion that public health risk rankings need re-evaluation in relation to financial risks. There was no evidence to demonstrate that public health risk mitigation had been costed and evaluated against the strategic objectives of the studied organisations. Furthermore, the nature of risk conversations varied within organisations, changing the meaning of risk vertically within the business. A proposed model for the reporting of risk tolerance and risk appetite with respect to mitigating public health risk is the result. Such approaches to risk reporting and costing will support water authorities in meeting corporate aspirations to become ‘high reliability’ services while retaining the capacity to out-perform financial and service level targets, irrespective of regulation, ownership arrangements or management culture.
author2 Jeffrey, Paul ; Pollard, Simon
author_facet Jeffrey, Paul ; Pollard, Simon
Allan, Richard
author Allan, Richard
author_sort Allan, Richard
title The impact of regulation, ownership arrangements, and management culture on risk management practices within the water industry
title_short The impact of regulation, ownership arrangements, and management culture on risk management practices within the water industry
title_full The impact of regulation, ownership arrangements, and management culture on risk management practices within the water industry
title_fullStr The impact of regulation, ownership arrangements, and management culture on risk management practices within the water industry
title_full_unstemmed The impact of regulation, ownership arrangements, and management culture on risk management practices within the water industry
title_sort impact of regulation, ownership arrangements, and management culture on risk management practices within the water industry
publisher Cranfield University
publishDate 2015
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.681446
work_keys_str_mv AT allanrichard theimpactofregulationownershiparrangementsandmanagementcultureonriskmanagementpracticeswithinthewaterindustry
AT allanrichard impactofregulationownershiparrangementsandmanagementcultureonriskmanagementpracticeswithinthewaterindustry
_version_ 1718522004712194048