Measuring and understanding segregation

Schelling's famous "spatial proximity" model of segregation was first introduced in 1969. His work sets out to explore residential dynamics in populations of ) more than one ethnicity. In particular, the notion of "tolerance" shows how even a small need for familiarity withi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haw, David
Published: University of Bristol 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.688345
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-688345
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6883452016-08-04T04:05:14ZMeasuring and understanding segregationHaw, David2015Schelling's famous "spatial proximity" model of segregation was first introduced in 1969. His work sets out to explore residential dynamics in populations of ) more than one ethnicity. In particular, the notion of "tolerance" shows how even a small need for familiarity within one's neighbourhood can result in largescale segregation. Schelling's "bounded neighbourhood model", outlined in the same publication, has however received much less attention from economists and mathematicians alike. This thesis provides a mathematical description of the latter model as a nonlinear dynamical system with which to explore the consequences of Schelling's intuition. In particular, we are able to deduce conditions under which segregation is not inevitable. The effect of varying the parameters and inputs of the model is studied in detail, and we use techniques from network theory and nonlinear dynamics in order to develop further variants of the model, beginning with those suggested by Schelling himself. Some new measures are developed that aid in the quantitative description of the equilibria of the model, based on the existing concepts of homophily and modularity. These developments enhance the power of Schelling's model in describing social dynamics. Additional work focuses on the study of networks of social interactions. In particular, we develop the idea of measuring segregation at the level of an individual agent via the use of different measures of centrality. Some simple examples illustrate the need for a range of measures in order to encapsulate an intuitive understanding of this complex phenomenon. This work enriches the toolbox of segregation measures available for future studies, allowing for deeper understanding of the structure of social systems.620.001University of Bristolhttp://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.688345Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 620.001
spellingShingle 620.001
Haw, David
Measuring and understanding segregation
description Schelling's famous "spatial proximity" model of segregation was first introduced in 1969. His work sets out to explore residential dynamics in populations of ) more than one ethnicity. In particular, the notion of "tolerance" shows how even a small need for familiarity within one's neighbourhood can result in largescale segregation. Schelling's "bounded neighbourhood model", outlined in the same publication, has however received much less attention from economists and mathematicians alike. This thesis provides a mathematical description of the latter model as a nonlinear dynamical system with which to explore the consequences of Schelling's intuition. In particular, we are able to deduce conditions under which segregation is not inevitable. The effect of varying the parameters and inputs of the model is studied in detail, and we use techniques from network theory and nonlinear dynamics in order to develop further variants of the model, beginning with those suggested by Schelling himself. Some new measures are developed that aid in the quantitative description of the equilibria of the model, based on the existing concepts of homophily and modularity. These developments enhance the power of Schelling's model in describing social dynamics. Additional work focuses on the study of networks of social interactions. In particular, we develop the idea of measuring segregation at the level of an individual agent via the use of different measures of centrality. Some simple examples illustrate the need for a range of measures in order to encapsulate an intuitive understanding of this complex phenomenon. This work enriches the toolbox of segregation measures available for future studies, allowing for deeper understanding of the structure of social systems.
author Haw, David
author_facet Haw, David
author_sort Haw, David
title Measuring and understanding segregation
title_short Measuring and understanding segregation
title_full Measuring and understanding segregation
title_fullStr Measuring and understanding segregation
title_full_unstemmed Measuring and understanding segregation
title_sort measuring and understanding segregation
publisher University of Bristol
publishDate 2015
url http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.688345
work_keys_str_mv AT hawdavid measuringandunderstandingsegregation
_version_ 1718373172143718400