The war as it was : historical reception of the Great War in American popular cinema, 1918-1938

This thesis is an examination of the reception of selected films from the United States concerning the Great War during the interwar period. Despite the influential nature of these films at the time of their release, relatively few studies have been conducted on the response of contemporary audience...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Copping, Ryan
Other Authors: Williams, Michael ; Hammond, Michael
Published: University of Southampton 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.690256
id ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-690256
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bl.uk-oai-ethos.bl.uk-6902562018-09-05T03:27:11ZThe war as it was : historical reception of the Great War in American popular cinema, 1918-1938Copping, RyanWilliams, Michael ; Hammond, Michael2016This thesis is an examination of the reception of selected films from the United States concerning the Great War during the interwar period. Despite the influential nature of these films at the time of their release, relatively few studies have been conducted on the response of contemporary audiences to these texts. Given the significance of the Great War as a critical event in modern history and culture, it is important to study the responses of audiences to works concerning the war during this period. Taking the war as a cinematic subject as opposed to a genre, I analyse both the content and reception of significant war-related films, using the movies themselves and contemporary newspaper and magazine articles and reviews, advertising and internal studio memoranda. I use this method in reference to the following films: The Heart of Humanity (1918), The Four Horseman of the Apocalypse (1921), The Big Parade (1925), What Price Glory (1926), Wings (1927), Hell’s Angels (1930), Journey’s End (1930), All Quiet on the Western Front (1930), Men Must Fight (1933), The Road Back (1937) and Three Comrades (1938). I argue that audiences often interpreted what they perceived to be honest portrayals of war trauma as ‘realistic’, there was no uniform definition as to what constituted an ‘anti-war’ film, Great War films from this period tended to blame Germany or humanity in general for the war, sometimes both, and that most war films performed a memorial function for audiences.791.43University of Southamptonhttps://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.690256https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/396342/Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
topic 791.43
spellingShingle 791.43
Copping, Ryan
The war as it was : historical reception of the Great War in American popular cinema, 1918-1938
description This thesis is an examination of the reception of selected films from the United States concerning the Great War during the interwar period. Despite the influential nature of these films at the time of their release, relatively few studies have been conducted on the response of contemporary audiences to these texts. Given the significance of the Great War as a critical event in modern history and culture, it is important to study the responses of audiences to works concerning the war during this period. Taking the war as a cinematic subject as opposed to a genre, I analyse both the content and reception of significant war-related films, using the movies themselves and contemporary newspaper and magazine articles and reviews, advertising and internal studio memoranda. I use this method in reference to the following films: The Heart of Humanity (1918), The Four Horseman of the Apocalypse (1921), The Big Parade (1925), What Price Glory (1926), Wings (1927), Hell’s Angels (1930), Journey’s End (1930), All Quiet on the Western Front (1930), Men Must Fight (1933), The Road Back (1937) and Three Comrades (1938). I argue that audiences often interpreted what they perceived to be honest portrayals of war trauma as ‘realistic’, there was no uniform definition as to what constituted an ‘anti-war’ film, Great War films from this period tended to blame Germany or humanity in general for the war, sometimes both, and that most war films performed a memorial function for audiences.
author2 Williams, Michael ; Hammond, Michael
author_facet Williams, Michael ; Hammond, Michael
Copping, Ryan
author Copping, Ryan
author_sort Copping, Ryan
title The war as it was : historical reception of the Great War in American popular cinema, 1918-1938
title_short The war as it was : historical reception of the Great War in American popular cinema, 1918-1938
title_full The war as it was : historical reception of the Great War in American popular cinema, 1918-1938
title_fullStr The war as it was : historical reception of the Great War in American popular cinema, 1918-1938
title_full_unstemmed The war as it was : historical reception of the Great War in American popular cinema, 1918-1938
title_sort war as it was : historical reception of the great war in american popular cinema, 1918-1938
publisher University of Southampton
publishDate 2016
url https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.690256
work_keys_str_mv AT coppingryan thewarasitwashistoricalreceptionofthegreatwarinamericanpopularcinema19181938
AT coppingryan warasitwashistoricalreceptionofthegreatwarinamericanpopularcinema19181938
_version_ 1718729744554393600