A comparison of archaic and Mississippian subsistence strategies utilizing dental microwear texture analysis

Thesis (M.S.F.S.) PLEASE NOTE: Boston University Libraries did not receive an Authorization To Manage form for this thesis or dissertation. It is therefore not openly accessible, though it may be available by request. If you are the author or principal advisor of this work and would like to request...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Henson, Tracie L.
Language:en_US
Published: Boston University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2144/21167
id ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-21167
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-211672019-01-08T15:41:31Z A comparison of archaic and Mississippian subsistence strategies utilizing dental microwear texture analysis Henson, Tracie L. Forensic science Bioforensics Subsistence strategies Dental microwear texture analysis Thesis (M.S.F.S.) PLEASE NOTE: Boston University Libraries did not receive an Authorization To Manage form for this thesis or dissertation. It is therefore not openly accessible, though it may be available by request. If you are the author or principal advisor of this work and would like to request open access for it, please contact us at open-help@bu.edu. Thank you. Throughout the past, bioarchaeologists have been concerned with identifying subsistence strategies of past populations and when subsistence strategies have transitioned from foraging to agriculture practices. Specifically, one area of major concentration has been examining the transition from foraging to agriculture in the southeast of the present day United States. The present study examines the transition of subsistence practices in prehistoric Tennessee utilizing dental microwear texture analysis. This study examined a total of 49 individuals from Archaic and Mississippian sites. These were compared temporally by comparing Archaic microwear signatures to Mississippian microwear signatures, and geographically, through the comparison of each site in relation to its geographic location. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests were utilized to determine if statistical significant differences existed between the Archaic and Mississippian groups analyzed, and to determine if statistical significant differences existed based on geographic location. Due to the small sample size utilized in the study, it must be stated that the results are preliminary and further testing using dental microwear texture analysis needs to be undertaken in order to better understand the results. 2031-01-01 2017-04-13T01:22:06Z 2013 2013 Thesis/Dissertation https://hdl.handle.net/2144/21167 en_US Boston University
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Forensic science
Bioforensics
Subsistence strategies
Dental microwear texture analysis
spellingShingle Forensic science
Bioforensics
Subsistence strategies
Dental microwear texture analysis
Henson, Tracie L.
A comparison of archaic and Mississippian subsistence strategies utilizing dental microwear texture analysis
description Thesis (M.S.F.S.) PLEASE NOTE: Boston University Libraries did not receive an Authorization To Manage form for this thesis or dissertation. It is therefore not openly accessible, though it may be available by request. If you are the author or principal advisor of this work and would like to request open access for it, please contact us at open-help@bu.edu. Thank you. === Throughout the past, bioarchaeologists have been concerned with identifying subsistence strategies of past populations and when subsistence strategies have transitioned from foraging to agriculture practices. Specifically, one area of major concentration has been examining the transition from foraging to agriculture in the southeast of the present day United States. The present study examines the transition of subsistence practices in prehistoric Tennessee utilizing dental microwear texture analysis. This study examined a total of 49 individuals from Archaic and Mississippian sites. These were compared temporally by comparing Archaic microwear signatures to Mississippian microwear signatures, and geographically, through the comparison of each site in relation to its geographic location. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney U tests were utilized to determine if statistical significant differences existed between the Archaic and Mississippian groups analyzed, and to determine if statistical significant differences existed based on geographic location. Due to the small sample size utilized in the study, it must be stated that the results are preliminary and further testing using dental microwear texture analysis needs to be undertaken in order to better understand the results. === 2031-01-01
author Henson, Tracie L.
author_facet Henson, Tracie L.
author_sort Henson, Tracie L.
title A comparison of archaic and Mississippian subsistence strategies utilizing dental microwear texture analysis
title_short A comparison of archaic and Mississippian subsistence strategies utilizing dental microwear texture analysis
title_full A comparison of archaic and Mississippian subsistence strategies utilizing dental microwear texture analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of archaic and Mississippian subsistence strategies utilizing dental microwear texture analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of archaic and Mississippian subsistence strategies utilizing dental microwear texture analysis
title_sort comparison of archaic and mississippian subsistence strategies utilizing dental microwear texture analysis
publisher Boston University
publishDate 2017
url https://hdl.handle.net/2144/21167
work_keys_str_mv AT hensontraciel acomparisonofarchaicandmississippiansubsistencestrategiesutilizingdentalmicroweartextureanalysis
AT hensontraciel comparisonofarchaicandmississippiansubsistencestrategiesutilizingdentalmicroweartextureanalysis
_version_ 1718812200543453184