| Summary: | Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University === PLEASE NOTE: Boston University Libraries did not receive an Authorization To Manage form for this thesis or dissertation. It is therefore not openly accessible, though it may be available by request. If you are the author or principal advisor of this work and would like to request open access for it, please contact us at open-help@bu.edu. Thank you. === Problem and Limits: The problem of this dissertation is to compare the theories of self developed in the writings of the religious educators William C. Bower and Randolph c. Miller and developed in the writings of the psychologists Erik H. Erikson, George H. Mead, Gordon W. Allport, and Arthur W. Combs and Donald Snygg. Bower and Miller were chosen because of their contributions to the literature, to the training of religious workers, and to the leading professional organizations. Erikson, Mead, Allport, and Combs and Snygg were selected because their writings have been influential in educational theory and because each represents one of four interpretations of the self frequently found in contemporary psychological thought.
The study examines. the relevance of the concept of self for Christian education to determine the follow.4.ng:: (l) the relationship of the self constructs developed by Bower and Miller to the self constructs developed by Erikson, Mead, Allport, and Combs 8.lld Snygg; (2) the relationship between the self constructs developed by Bower and Miller. [TRUNCATED] === 2031-01-01
|
|---|
