Determining temporal recording schemes for underwater acoustic monitoring studies

Soundscape Ecology, the physical combination of sounds at a particular time and place, is a rapidly growing field. As acoustic technology advances, several possible future uses of passive acoustic monitoring (PAM), such as biodiversity counts and monitoring of habitat health, are being explored. Thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lindseth, Adelaide Virginia
Other Authors: Lobel, Phillip S.
Language:en_US
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/2144/34796
id ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-34796
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-bu.edu-oai-open.bu.edu-2144-347962019-04-13T15:11:10Z Determining temporal recording schemes for underwater acoustic monitoring studies Lindseth, Adelaide Virginia Lobel, Phillip S. Acoustics Ambient noise Coral reef Environmental monitoring Passive acoustic monitoring Soundscape ecology Underwater sound Soundscape Ecology, the physical combination of sounds at a particular time and place, is a rapidly growing field. As acoustic technology advances, several possible future uses of passive acoustic monitoring (PAM), such as biodiversity counts and monitoring of habitat health, are being explored. This thesis is divided into two chapters; each is a stand-alone paper. The first chapter provides a review of soundscape ecology, ambient sound, current recording methods and data analysis used in PAM studies, and identifies several major future recommendations for the field. One of these recommendations is to standardize recording methods and indices used during analysis in long-term studies. The second chapter analyzes a 55-minute continuous recording on a coral reef in Tunicate Cove, Belize in 1996 by Professor P. Lobel. This recording was then subsampled with several intermittent recording schedules to explore the amount of acoustic information lost as periods of active and inactive recording vary. The continuous recording consisted of a high frequency band (3-4 kHz), which may correspond to abiotic sounds, and a low frequency band (0.1-0.5 kHz), which generally corresponds to biotic sounds. Two recording schedules, 30 seconds every 4 minutes and 2 minutes every 10 minutes, were significantly correlated with the continuous recording. The statistical significance of the other five recording schedules varied among the three parameters tested in this study (average power (dB), average entropy, and aggregate entropy). 2019-04-12T15:37:47Z 2019-04-12T15:37:47Z 2019 2019-02-21T02:02:27Z Thesis/Dissertation https://hdl.handle.net/2144/34796 en_US Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Acoustics
Ambient noise
Coral reef
Environmental monitoring
Passive acoustic monitoring
Soundscape ecology
Underwater sound
spellingShingle Acoustics
Ambient noise
Coral reef
Environmental monitoring
Passive acoustic monitoring
Soundscape ecology
Underwater sound
Lindseth, Adelaide Virginia
Determining temporal recording schemes for underwater acoustic monitoring studies
description Soundscape Ecology, the physical combination of sounds at a particular time and place, is a rapidly growing field. As acoustic technology advances, several possible future uses of passive acoustic monitoring (PAM), such as biodiversity counts and monitoring of habitat health, are being explored. This thesis is divided into two chapters; each is a stand-alone paper. The first chapter provides a review of soundscape ecology, ambient sound, current recording methods and data analysis used in PAM studies, and identifies several major future recommendations for the field. One of these recommendations is to standardize recording methods and indices used during analysis in long-term studies. The second chapter analyzes a 55-minute continuous recording on a coral reef in Tunicate Cove, Belize in 1996 by Professor P. Lobel. This recording was then subsampled with several intermittent recording schedules to explore the amount of acoustic information lost as periods of active and inactive recording vary. The continuous recording consisted of a high frequency band (3-4 kHz), which may correspond to abiotic sounds, and a low frequency band (0.1-0.5 kHz), which generally corresponds to biotic sounds. Two recording schedules, 30 seconds every 4 minutes and 2 minutes every 10 minutes, were significantly correlated with the continuous recording. The statistical significance of the other five recording schedules varied among the three parameters tested in this study (average power (dB), average entropy, and aggregate entropy).
author2 Lobel, Phillip S.
author_facet Lobel, Phillip S.
Lindseth, Adelaide Virginia
author Lindseth, Adelaide Virginia
author_sort Lindseth, Adelaide Virginia
title Determining temporal recording schemes for underwater acoustic monitoring studies
title_short Determining temporal recording schemes for underwater acoustic monitoring studies
title_full Determining temporal recording schemes for underwater acoustic monitoring studies
title_fullStr Determining temporal recording schemes for underwater acoustic monitoring studies
title_full_unstemmed Determining temporal recording schemes for underwater acoustic monitoring studies
title_sort determining temporal recording schemes for underwater acoustic monitoring studies
publishDate 2019
url https://hdl.handle.net/2144/34796
work_keys_str_mv AT lindsethadelaidevirginia determiningtemporalrecordingschemesforunderwateracousticmonitoringstudies
_version_ 1719018166866149376