Reintegration Planning for Sexual Offenders: Relationships with Static and Dynamic Risk, Treatment Outcome and Recidivism

Willis and Grace (2008, 2009) developed a protocol for measuring quality of planning for community reintegration by sexual offenders, and showed that poor planning was a risk factor for sexual recidivism. The present study evaluated the reliability and predictive validity of Willis and Grace’s prot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scoones, Carwyn David
Language:en
Published: University of Canterbury. Psychology 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10092/5393
id ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-5393
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-53932015-03-30T15:28:01ZReintegration Planning for Sexual Offenders: Relationships with Static and Dynamic Risk, Treatment Outcome and RecidivismScoones, Carwyn Davidreintegrationreentryrecidivismsexual offenderschild molestersrisk assessmentWillis and Grace (2008, 2009) developed a protocol for measuring quality of planning for community reintegration by sexual offenders, and showed that poor planning was a risk factor for sexual recidivism. The present study evaluated the reliability and predictive validity of Willis and Grace’s protocol with a large, representative sample of child molesters who completed a prison-based treatment programme between 1993 and 2000. Overall, the quality of reintegration planning was good for the sample as a whole, with an average equal to 61.7% of the maximum possible score. Results supported the reliability and predictive validity of the protocol in assessing reintegration quality. Reintegration scores were negatively correlated sexual recidivism and with measures of pre-treatment static and dynamic risk, particularly the Criminality and Treatment Responsivity factors of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version (VRS: SO; Olver, Wong, Nicholaichuk, & Gordon, 2007). Measures of intelligence and treatment outcome were positively correlated with reintegration quality, particularly the Standard Goal Attainment Scaling for Sex Offenders (SGAS; Hogue, 1994), suggesting that offenders who were successful in achieving treatment goals were also likely to have effective reintegration plans. Survival analyses (Cox regression) showed that reintegration planning contributed additional validity for predicting sexual recidivism when static risk but not dynamic risk was controlled. Overall, results support the utility of Willis and Grace’s protocol for measuring quality of reintegration planning. Future research should examine reintegration planning for other types of sexual and non-sexual offenders.University of Canterbury. Psychology2011-09-02T02:29:11Z2011-09-02T02:29:11Z2010Electronic thesis or dissertationTexthttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/5393enNZCUCopyright Carwyn David Scooneshttp://library.canterbury.ac.nz/thesis/etheses_copyright.shtml
collection NDLTD
language en
sources NDLTD
topic reintegration
reentry
recidivism
sexual offenders
child molesters
risk assessment
spellingShingle reintegration
reentry
recidivism
sexual offenders
child molesters
risk assessment
Scoones, Carwyn David
Reintegration Planning for Sexual Offenders: Relationships with Static and Dynamic Risk, Treatment Outcome and Recidivism
description Willis and Grace (2008, 2009) developed a protocol for measuring quality of planning for community reintegration by sexual offenders, and showed that poor planning was a risk factor for sexual recidivism. The present study evaluated the reliability and predictive validity of Willis and Grace’s protocol with a large, representative sample of child molesters who completed a prison-based treatment programme between 1993 and 2000. Overall, the quality of reintegration planning was good for the sample as a whole, with an average equal to 61.7% of the maximum possible score. Results supported the reliability and predictive validity of the protocol in assessing reintegration quality. Reintegration scores were negatively correlated sexual recidivism and with measures of pre-treatment static and dynamic risk, particularly the Criminality and Treatment Responsivity factors of the Violence Risk Scale: Sexual Offender Version (VRS: SO; Olver, Wong, Nicholaichuk, & Gordon, 2007). Measures of intelligence and treatment outcome were positively correlated with reintegration quality, particularly the Standard Goal Attainment Scaling for Sex Offenders (SGAS; Hogue, 1994), suggesting that offenders who were successful in achieving treatment goals were also likely to have effective reintegration plans. Survival analyses (Cox regression) showed that reintegration planning contributed additional validity for predicting sexual recidivism when static risk but not dynamic risk was controlled. Overall, results support the utility of Willis and Grace’s protocol for measuring quality of reintegration planning. Future research should examine reintegration planning for other types of sexual and non-sexual offenders.
author Scoones, Carwyn David
author_facet Scoones, Carwyn David
author_sort Scoones, Carwyn David
title Reintegration Planning for Sexual Offenders: Relationships with Static and Dynamic Risk, Treatment Outcome and Recidivism
title_short Reintegration Planning for Sexual Offenders: Relationships with Static and Dynamic Risk, Treatment Outcome and Recidivism
title_full Reintegration Planning for Sexual Offenders: Relationships with Static and Dynamic Risk, Treatment Outcome and Recidivism
title_fullStr Reintegration Planning for Sexual Offenders: Relationships with Static and Dynamic Risk, Treatment Outcome and Recidivism
title_full_unstemmed Reintegration Planning for Sexual Offenders: Relationships with Static and Dynamic Risk, Treatment Outcome and Recidivism
title_sort reintegration planning for sexual offenders: relationships with static and dynamic risk, treatment outcome and recidivism
publisher University of Canterbury. Psychology
publishDate 2011
url http://hdl.handle.net/10092/5393
work_keys_str_mv AT scoonescarwyndavid reintegrationplanningforsexualoffendersrelationshipswithstaticanddynamicrisktreatmentoutcomeandrecidivism
_version_ 1716798213008130048