'Maori Sovereignty' Donna Awatere - 1982
This thesis explores the ambivalent nature of Maori political theory as expressed through the writings of Donna Awatere in her publication Maori Sovereignty. Consequently it traces the intellectual history of Maori political thought with a particular emphasis on how Maori have traditionally perceive...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Language: | en |
Published: |
University of Canterbury. Humanities
2012
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10092/7000 |
id |
ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-7000 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-canterbury.ac.nz-oai-ir.canterbury.ac.nz-10092-70002015-07-31T03:32:46Z'Maori Sovereignty' Donna Awatere - 1982Kamau, Laura-Margaret Ngahere Te PoheThis thesis explores the ambivalent nature of Maori political theory as expressed through the writings of Donna Awatere in her publication Maori Sovereignty. Consequently it traces the intellectual history of Maori political thought with a particular emphasis on how Maori have traditionally perceived and advanced their ‘sovereignty’ and its equivalent term, ‘tino rangatiratanga’. The reason for this emphasis is to show how Awatere changed Maori perception of their tino rangatiratanga when she coined the phrase ‘Maori Sovereignty’ in 1982. This work offers an insider’s account into New Zealand’s ‘movements of unity’ that had occurred during the 1970’s and 1980’s based on Awatere’s personal experiences and involvement in various groups. Further it sets out to capture the influences and events that led Awatere to write Maori Sovereignty in order to demonstrate how she had advanced Maori understanding of their tino rangatiratanga. In addition, its attempts to broaden Maori understanding of their tino rangatiratanga by analysing Awatere’s political theory in juxtaposition with global trends, more specifically, the decolonisation and nationalistic processes that occurred in the decades following World War Two. This thesis argues that Maori Sovereignty differed greatly from any other work previously written by both Maori and Pakeha as it challenged existing interpretations of how Maori had perceived and had advanced their tino rangatiratanga. Subsequently, Maori Sovereignty has carved its place as one of New Zealand’s most debated and misunderstood publication to ever come out of the 1980’s and because of this, the lack of proper analysis has given cause for this thesis.University of Canterbury. Humanities2012-09-12T00:45:53Z2015-07-30T12:20:06Z2010Electronic thesis or dissertationTexthttp://hdl.handle.net/10092/7000enNZCUCopyright Laura-Margaret Ngahere Te Pohe Kamauhttp://library.canterbury.ac.nz/thesis/etheses_copyright.shtml |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
This thesis explores the ambivalent nature of Maori political theory as expressed through the writings of Donna Awatere in her publication Maori Sovereignty. Consequently it traces the intellectual history of Maori political thought with a particular emphasis on how Maori have traditionally perceived and advanced their ‘sovereignty’ and its equivalent term, ‘tino rangatiratanga’. The reason for this emphasis is to show how Awatere changed Maori perception of their tino rangatiratanga when she coined the phrase ‘Maori Sovereignty’ in 1982.
This work offers an insider’s account into New Zealand’s ‘movements of unity’ that had occurred during the 1970’s and 1980’s based on Awatere’s personal experiences and involvement in various groups. Further it sets out to capture the influences and events that led Awatere to write Maori Sovereignty in order to demonstrate how she had advanced Maori understanding of their tino rangatiratanga. In addition, its attempts to broaden Maori understanding of their tino rangatiratanga by analysing Awatere’s political theory in juxtaposition with global trends, more specifically, the decolonisation and nationalistic processes that occurred in the decades following World War Two.
This thesis argues that Maori Sovereignty differed greatly from any other work previously written by both Maori and Pakeha as it challenged existing interpretations of how Maori had perceived and had advanced their tino rangatiratanga. Subsequently, Maori Sovereignty has carved its place as one of New Zealand’s most debated and misunderstood publication to ever come out of the 1980’s and because of this, the lack of proper analysis has given cause for this thesis. |
author |
Kamau, Laura-Margaret Ngahere Te Pohe |
spellingShingle |
Kamau, Laura-Margaret Ngahere Te Pohe 'Maori Sovereignty' Donna Awatere - 1982 |
author_facet |
Kamau, Laura-Margaret Ngahere Te Pohe |
author_sort |
Kamau, Laura-Margaret Ngahere Te Pohe |
title |
'Maori Sovereignty' Donna Awatere - 1982 |
title_short |
'Maori Sovereignty' Donna Awatere - 1982 |
title_full |
'Maori Sovereignty' Donna Awatere - 1982 |
title_fullStr |
'Maori Sovereignty' Donna Awatere - 1982 |
title_full_unstemmed |
'Maori Sovereignty' Donna Awatere - 1982 |
title_sort |
'maori sovereignty' donna awatere - 1982 |
publisher |
University of Canterbury. Humanities |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10092/7000 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kamaulauramargaretngaheretepohe maorisovereigntydonnaawatere1982 |
_version_ |
1716815233627979776 |