Inventing Chinese Buddhas: Identity, Authority, and Liberation in Song-Dynasty Chan Buddhism

This dissertation explores how Chan Buddhists made the unprecedented claim to a level of religious authority on par with the historical Buddha Śākyamuni and, in the process, invented what it means to be a buddha in China. This claim helped propel the Chan tradition to dominance of elite monastic Bud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Buckelew, Kevin
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7916/D81Z5MKZ
id ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-D81Z5MKZ
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-columbia.edu-oai-academiccommons.columbia.edu-10.7916-D81Z5MKZ2019-05-09T15:15:48ZInventing Chinese Buddhas: Identity, Authority, and Liberation in Song-Dynasty Chan BuddhismBuckelew, Kevin2018ThesesReligionSong Dynasty (China)HistoryMahayana BuddhismZen BuddhismBuddhasChinese--ReligionThis dissertation explores how Chan Buddhists made the unprecedented claim to a level of religious authority on par with the historical Buddha Śākyamuni and, in the process, invented what it means to be a buddha in China. This claim helped propel the Chan tradition to dominance of elite monastic Buddhism during the Song dynasty (960-1279), licensed an outpouring of Chan literature treated as equivalent to scripture, and changed the way Chinese Buddhists understood their own capacity for religious authority in relation to the historical Buddha and the Indian homeland of Buddhism. But the claim itself was fraught with complication. After all, according to canonical Buddhist scriptures, the Buddha was easily recognizable by the “marks of the great man” that adorned his body, while the same could not be said for Chan masters in the Song. What, then, distinguished Chan masters from everyone else? What authorized their elite status and granted them the authority of buddhas? According to what normative ideals did Chan aspirants pursue liberation, and by what standards did Chan masters evaluate their students to determine who was worthy of admission into an elite Chan lineage? How, in short, could one recognize a buddha in Song-dynasty China? The Chan tradition never answered this question once and for all; instead, the question broadly animated Chan rituals, institutional norms, literary practices, and visual cultures. My dissertation takes a performative approach to the analysis of Chan hagiographies, discourse records, commentarial collections, and visual materials, mobilizing the tradition’s rich archive to measure how Chan interventions in Buddhist tradition changed the landscape of elite Chinese Buddhism and participated in the epochal changes attending China’s Tang-to-Song transition.Englishhttps://doi.org/10.7916/D81Z5MKZ
collection NDLTD
language English
sources NDLTD
topic Religion
Song Dynasty (China)
History
Mahayana Buddhism
Zen Buddhism
Buddhas
Chinese--Religion
spellingShingle Religion
Song Dynasty (China)
History
Mahayana Buddhism
Zen Buddhism
Buddhas
Chinese--Religion
Buckelew, Kevin
Inventing Chinese Buddhas: Identity, Authority, and Liberation in Song-Dynasty Chan Buddhism
description This dissertation explores how Chan Buddhists made the unprecedented claim to a level of religious authority on par with the historical Buddha Śākyamuni and, in the process, invented what it means to be a buddha in China. This claim helped propel the Chan tradition to dominance of elite monastic Buddhism during the Song dynasty (960-1279), licensed an outpouring of Chan literature treated as equivalent to scripture, and changed the way Chinese Buddhists understood their own capacity for religious authority in relation to the historical Buddha and the Indian homeland of Buddhism. But the claim itself was fraught with complication. After all, according to canonical Buddhist scriptures, the Buddha was easily recognizable by the “marks of the great man” that adorned his body, while the same could not be said for Chan masters in the Song. What, then, distinguished Chan masters from everyone else? What authorized their elite status and granted them the authority of buddhas? According to what normative ideals did Chan aspirants pursue liberation, and by what standards did Chan masters evaluate their students to determine who was worthy of admission into an elite Chan lineage? How, in short, could one recognize a buddha in Song-dynasty China? The Chan tradition never answered this question once and for all; instead, the question broadly animated Chan rituals, institutional norms, literary practices, and visual cultures. My dissertation takes a performative approach to the analysis of Chan hagiographies, discourse records, commentarial collections, and visual materials, mobilizing the tradition’s rich archive to measure how Chan interventions in Buddhist tradition changed the landscape of elite Chinese Buddhism and participated in the epochal changes attending China’s Tang-to-Song transition.
author Buckelew, Kevin
author_facet Buckelew, Kevin
author_sort Buckelew, Kevin
title Inventing Chinese Buddhas: Identity, Authority, and Liberation in Song-Dynasty Chan Buddhism
title_short Inventing Chinese Buddhas: Identity, Authority, and Liberation in Song-Dynasty Chan Buddhism
title_full Inventing Chinese Buddhas: Identity, Authority, and Liberation in Song-Dynasty Chan Buddhism
title_fullStr Inventing Chinese Buddhas: Identity, Authority, and Liberation in Song-Dynasty Chan Buddhism
title_full_unstemmed Inventing Chinese Buddhas: Identity, Authority, and Liberation in Song-Dynasty Chan Buddhism
title_sort inventing chinese buddhas: identity, authority, and liberation in song-dynasty chan buddhism
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.7916/D81Z5MKZ
work_keys_str_mv AT buckelewkevin inventingchinesebuddhasidentityauthorityandliberationinsongdynastychanbuddhism
_version_ 1719046709420490752