The influence of professional identity and outcome knowledge on professional judgment
In response to the release of one of its Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB or Board) inspection reports, Deloitte notes that “[p]rofessional judgments of reasonable and highly competent people may differ as to the nature and extent of necessary auditing procedures, conclusions reac...
Other Authors: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Florida Atlantic University
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://purl.flvc.org/fau/fd/FA00004126 http://purl.flvc.org/fau/fd/FA00004126 |
id |
ndltd-fau.edu-oai-fau.digital.flvc.org-fau_13464 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-fau.edu-oai-fau.digital.flvc.org-fau_134642019-07-04T03:53:27Z The influence of professional identity and outcome knowledge on professional judgment FA00004126 Johnson, Anna J. (author) Higgs, Julia (Thesis advisor) Florida Atlantic University (Degree grantor) College of Business School of Accounting 135 p. application/pdf Electronic Thesis or Dissertation Text English In response to the release of one of its Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB or Board) inspection reports, Deloitte notes that “[p]rofessional judgments of reasonable and highly competent people may differ as to the nature and extent of necessary auditing procedures, conclusions reached and required documentation” (PCAOB, 2008, 30). Other responses to PCAOB findings echo this sentiment. Stakeholders need to understand causes of differences between experts’ professional judgments to effectively utilize PCAOB inspection findings and firms’ responses to those findings. This study uses Social Identity Theory to explore whether role identity as an audit partner, internal reviewer, or PCAOB inspector, influences an expert’s judgments in an ambiguous decision environment. I find that professional judgments do not differ based on professional identity. This study also examines whether the presence or absence of outcome knowledge explains judgment differences among auditing experts. Consistent with prior research, e.g. Peecher & Piercey, 2008, outcome knowledge does affect experts’ professional judgment. I also find that experts’ level of organizational identification and membership esteem impacts professional judgment. Florida Atlantic University Accountants -- Professional ethics Accounting -- Decision making Auditing -- Decision making Business ethics Judgment Managerial accounting Includes bibliography. Dissertation (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2014. FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection Copyright © is held by the author, with permission granted to Florida Atlantic University to digitize, archive and distribute this item for non-profit research and educational purposes. Any reuse of this item in excess of fair use or other copyright exemptions requires permission of the copyright holder. http://purl.flvc.org/fau/fd/FA00004126 http://purl.flvc.org/fau/fd/FA00004126 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ https://fau.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/fau%3A13464/datastream/TN/view/The%20influence%20of%20professional%20identity%20and%20outcome%20knowledge%20on%20professional%20judgment.jpg |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Accountants -- Professional ethics Accounting -- Decision making Auditing -- Decision making Business ethics Judgment Managerial accounting |
spellingShingle |
Accountants -- Professional ethics Accounting -- Decision making Auditing -- Decision making Business ethics Judgment Managerial accounting The influence of professional identity and outcome knowledge on professional judgment |
description |
In response to the release of one of its Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(PCAOB or Board) inspection reports, Deloitte notes that “[p]rofessional judgments of
reasonable and highly competent people may differ as to the nature and extent of
necessary auditing procedures, conclusions reached and required documentation”
(PCAOB, 2008, 30). Other responses to PCAOB findings echo this sentiment.
Stakeholders need to understand causes of differences between experts’ professional
judgments to effectively utilize PCAOB inspection findings and firms’ responses to those
findings. This study uses Social Identity Theory to explore whether role identity as an
audit partner, internal reviewer, or PCAOB inspector, influences an expert’s judgments in
an ambiguous decision environment. I find that professional judgments do not differ
based on professional identity. This study also examines whether the presence or absence
of outcome knowledge explains judgment differences among auditing experts. Consistent
with prior research, e.g. Peecher & Piercey, 2008, outcome knowledge does affect experts’ professional judgment. I also find that experts’ level of organizational identification and membership esteem impacts professional judgment. === Includes bibliography. === Dissertation (Ph.D.)--Florida Atlantic University, 2014. === FAU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Collection |
author2 |
Johnson, Anna J. (author) |
author_facet |
Johnson, Anna J. (author) |
title |
The influence of professional identity and outcome knowledge on professional judgment |
title_short |
The influence of professional identity and outcome knowledge on professional judgment |
title_full |
The influence of professional identity and outcome knowledge on professional judgment |
title_fullStr |
The influence of professional identity and outcome knowledge on professional judgment |
title_full_unstemmed |
The influence of professional identity and outcome knowledge on professional judgment |
title_sort |
influence of professional identity and outcome knowledge on professional judgment |
publisher |
Florida Atlantic University |
url |
http://purl.flvc.org/fau/fd/FA00004126 http://purl.flvc.org/fau/fd/FA00004126 |
_version_ |
1719218992788275200 |