Petty Despots and Executive Officials: Civil Military Relations in the Early American Navy

As a new nation, the United States lacked the long naval traditions of the other powers of the time, particularly Great Britain. When Congress created a naval force in 1794, the country had to rely on its first officers to form the traditions of the service and lay the foundations of the American Na...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Sheppard, Thomas (authoraut)
Format: Others
Language:English
English
Published: Florida State University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-0312
id ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_168447
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_1684472019-07-01T04:09:52Z Petty Despots and Executive Officials: Civil Military Relations in the Early American Navy Sheppard, Thomas (authoraut) Hadden, Sally (professor directing thesis) Creswell, Michael (committee member) Jones, James (committee member) Department of History (degree granting department) Florida State University (degree granting institution) Text text Florida State University English eng 1 online resource computer application/pdf As a new nation, the United States lacked the long naval traditions of the other powers of the time, particularly Great Britain. When Congress created a naval force in 1794, the country had to rely on its first officers to form the traditions of the service and lay the foundations of the American Navy. These first officers bequeathed to their country the naval force that would eventually challenge the mighty Royal Navy in the War of 1812. However, officers alone were not responsible for the maturation of the Navy. Civilian officials, notably the Secretary of the Navy, also played a major role in the development of an American maritime force. These two components did not always interact harmoniously. Captains, used to the total autonomy that command at sea in an era of starkly limited communication created, often had difficulty subordinating themselves to their civilian superiors. During the first three decades of the Navy's existence, successive Secretaries of the Navy would gradually increase their authority over their officers, establishing the traditions of civilian control over the military that had long been a part of land warfare. This thesis explores the process whereby the question of ultimate authority over the Navy was settled, beginning with the creation of the navy and culminating in the creation of the Board of Naval Commissioners following the War of 1812. A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a degree of Master of Arts. Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2010. Date of Defense: March 23, 2010. Officer Corps, Quasi War, Barbary Wars, War of 1812, American Navy, Civil-Military Relations Includes bibliographical references. Sally Hadden, Professor Directing Thesis; Michael Creswell, Committee Member; James Jones, Committee Member. History FSU_migr_etd-0312 http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-0312 http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A168447/datastream/TN/view/Petty%20Despots%20and%20Executive%20Officials.jpg
collection NDLTD
language English
English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic History
spellingShingle History
Petty Despots and Executive Officials: Civil Military Relations in the Early American Navy
description As a new nation, the United States lacked the long naval traditions of the other powers of the time, particularly Great Britain. When Congress created a naval force in 1794, the country had to rely on its first officers to form the traditions of the service and lay the foundations of the American Navy. These first officers bequeathed to their country the naval force that would eventually challenge the mighty Royal Navy in the War of 1812. However, officers alone were not responsible for the maturation of the Navy. Civilian officials, notably the Secretary of the Navy, also played a major role in the development of an American maritime force. These two components did not always interact harmoniously. Captains, used to the total autonomy that command at sea in an era of starkly limited communication created, often had difficulty subordinating themselves to their civilian superiors. During the first three decades of the Navy's existence, successive Secretaries of the Navy would gradually increase their authority over their officers, establishing the traditions of civilian control over the military that had long been a part of land warfare. This thesis explores the process whereby the question of ultimate authority over the Navy was settled, beginning with the creation of the navy and culminating in the creation of the Board of Naval Commissioners following the War of 1812. === A Thesis submitted to the Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a degree of Master of Arts. === Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2010. === Date of Defense: March 23, 2010. === Officer Corps, Quasi War, Barbary Wars, War of 1812, American Navy, Civil-Military Relations === Includes bibliographical references. === Sally Hadden, Professor Directing Thesis; Michael Creswell, Committee Member; James Jones, Committee Member.
author2 Sheppard, Thomas (authoraut)
author_facet Sheppard, Thomas (authoraut)
title Petty Despots and Executive Officials: Civil Military Relations in the Early American Navy
title_short Petty Despots and Executive Officials: Civil Military Relations in the Early American Navy
title_full Petty Despots and Executive Officials: Civil Military Relations in the Early American Navy
title_fullStr Petty Despots and Executive Officials: Civil Military Relations in the Early American Navy
title_full_unstemmed Petty Despots and Executive Officials: Civil Military Relations in the Early American Navy
title_sort petty despots and executive officials: civil military relations in the early american navy
publisher Florida State University
url http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-0312
_version_ 1719215552710311936