Fowltown and the First Seminole War: "Civilization," Centralization, and Politics in the Early American Republic
This thesis investigates changes in Creek and Seminole society wrought about by centuries of European contact, participation— or lack thereof— in the Euro-American marketplace by Creek Indians, and the attempts of the United States government to deal with and control the Creeks. The destruction of F...
Other Authors: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Florida State University
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2406 |
id |
ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_180610 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_1806102020-06-09T03:09:58Z Fowltown and the First Seminole War: "Civilization," Centralization, and Politics in the Early American Republic Miller, James Hendry (authoraut) Frank, Andrew (professor directing thesis) Gray, Edward (committee member) Doel, Ronald (committee member) Department of History (degree granting department) Florida State University (degree granting institution) Text text Florida State University Florida State University English eng 1 online resource computer application/pdf This thesis investigates changes in Creek and Seminole society wrought about by centuries of European contact, participation— or lack thereof— in the Euro-American marketplace by Creek Indians, and the attempts of the United States government to deal with and control the Creeks. The destruction of Fowltown in 1817 provides a perspective into the struggles occurring inside and outside of Muskogee culture. The contest for autonomy remained at the center of the conflict for Fowltown and other villages. The nascent centralized Creek government and the American federal government attempted to assert control over individual villages, which previously acted as autonomous entities and only in confederation with other Creeks. In the turmoil of the first two decades of the nineteenth century, villages reacted to these attacks against their autonomy in different ways. Fowltown's course of action favored maintaining village control of local affairs. Outside pressures forced Fowltown to resort to violence in order to protect its sovereignty. After Fowltown's destruction and the skirmishes and limited action of the First Seminole War, American officials, politicians, and military officers waged their own political battles over the war and the place of Native Americans in antebellum America. These debates were part of ongoing discussions about the federal policy of civilizing the Indians in order to bring them into the fold of white-American life. The two American officials closest to Fowltown's destruction, General Edmund P. Gaines and Creek Indian Agent David B. Mitchell, played prominent roles in the debates. Their occupations and politics pitted them against one another and their words showed the differing opinions on Fowltown's meaning between American officials and between whites and Native Americans. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts. Summer Semester, 2011. April 29, 2011. Civilization, Creek Indians, Seminole Indians, First Seminole War Includes bibliographical references. Andrew Frank, Professor Directing Thesis; Edward Gray, Committee Member; Ronald Doel, Committee Member. History FSU_migr_etd-2406 http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2406 This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A180610/datastream/TN/view/Fowltown%20and%20the%20First%20Seminole%20War.jpg |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
History |
spellingShingle |
History Fowltown and the First Seminole War: "Civilization," Centralization, and Politics in the Early American Republic |
description |
This thesis investigates changes in Creek and Seminole society wrought about by centuries of European contact, participation— or lack thereof— in the Euro-American marketplace by Creek Indians, and the attempts of the United States government to deal with and control the Creeks. The destruction of Fowltown in 1817 provides a perspective into the struggles occurring inside and outside of Muskogee culture. The contest for autonomy remained at the center of the conflict for Fowltown and other villages. The nascent centralized Creek government and the American federal government attempted to assert control over individual villages, which previously acted as autonomous entities and only in confederation with other Creeks. In the turmoil of the first two decades of the nineteenth century, villages reacted to these attacks against their autonomy in different ways. Fowltown's course of action favored maintaining village control of local affairs. Outside pressures forced Fowltown to resort to violence in order to protect its sovereignty. After Fowltown's destruction and the skirmishes and limited action of the First Seminole War, American officials, politicians, and military officers waged their own political battles over the war and the place of Native Americans in antebellum America. These debates were part of ongoing discussions about the federal policy of civilizing the Indians in order to bring them into the fold of white-American life. The two American officials closest to Fowltown's destruction, General Edmund P. Gaines and Creek Indian Agent David B. Mitchell, played prominent roles in the debates. Their occupations and politics pitted them against one another and their words showed the differing opinions on Fowltown's meaning between American officials and between whites and Native Americans. === A Thesis Submitted to the Department of History in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts. === Summer Semester, 2011. === April 29, 2011. === Civilization, Creek Indians, Seminole Indians, First Seminole War === Includes bibliographical references. === Andrew Frank, Professor Directing Thesis; Edward Gray, Committee Member; Ronald Doel, Committee Member. |
author2 |
Miller, James Hendry (authoraut) |
author_facet |
Miller, James Hendry (authoraut) |
title |
Fowltown and the First Seminole War: "Civilization," Centralization, and Politics in the Early American Republic |
title_short |
Fowltown and the First Seminole War: "Civilization," Centralization, and Politics in the Early American Republic |
title_full |
Fowltown and the First Seminole War: "Civilization," Centralization, and Politics in the Early American Republic |
title_fullStr |
Fowltown and the First Seminole War: "Civilization," Centralization, and Politics in the Early American Republic |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fowltown and the First Seminole War: "Civilization," Centralization, and Politics in the Early American Republic |
title_sort |
fowltown and the first seminole war: "civilization," centralization, and politics in the early american republic |
publisher |
Florida State University |
url |
http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2406 |
_version_ |
1719318374476939264 |