Unexpected Direction of Differential Item Functioning

Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of DIF detection methods, when two groups have different ability distributions. Such studies typically have demonstrated factors that are associated with inflation of Type I error rates in DIF detection, such as mean ability differences. H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Park, Sangwook, 1974- (authoraut)
Format: Others
Language:English
English
Published: Florida State University
Subjects:
Online Access:http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-5089
id ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_183050
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_1830502020-06-16T03:07:26Z Unexpected Direction of Differential Item Functioning Park, Sangwook, 1974- (authoraut) Becker, Betsy Jane (professor co-directing dissertation) Kamata, Akihito (professor co-directing dissertation) Huffer, Fred (university representative) Yang, Yanyun (committee member) Paek, Insu (committee member) Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems (degree granting department) Florida State University (degree granting institution) Text text Florida State University Florida State University English eng 1 online resource computer application/pdf Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of DIF detection methods, when two groups have different ability distributions. Such studies typically have demonstrated factors that are associated with inflation of Type I error rates in DIF detection, such as mean ability differences. However, no study has examined how the direction of DIF is affected by the factors that inflate the Type I error rate. Therefore, this study investigated the possibility that the direction of DIF is systematically detected in an unexpected way, which may result in unexpected detection of DIF advantaging lower ability groups on difficult items. An extensive simulation was conducted to evaluate whether DIF in unexpected directions was observed systematically under the logistic regression approach to DIF detection. Four factors were considered in this study: 1) means of ability distributions, 2) standard deviations of ability distributions, 3) sample sizes, and 4) the magnitude of the pseudo-guessing parameters. Three levels were considered for the ability means, and two levels were considered for the ability standard deviations. Three levels were examined for sample sizes and guessing parameters. As a result, 54 (3 × 2 × 3 × 3) simulation conditions were considered. In addition, items were grouped into five groups depending on their difficulties; very easy, easy, moderate, difficult, and very difficult. The effects of the four simulation factors were evaluated for each one of the five item-difficulty groups. For each condition, 500 replications were conducted. DIF error rates, bias, SE, RMSE, the direction of DIF, and distributions of the biases were examined to evaluate the effects of the four simulation factors. The results revealed that the mean of the ability distribution and the magnitude of the pseudo-guessing parameters indeed contributed dramatically to inflation of DIF error rates, especially for very easy and very difficult items. Moreover, the directions of DIF were all negative for very easy items, but all positive for very difficult items. Finally, limitations and practical implications were discussed. A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Fall Semester, 2011. August 4, 2011. Bias, Differential Item Functioning, Logistic Regression Includes bibliographical references. Betsy Jane Becker, Professor Co-Directing Dissertation; Akihito Kamata, Professor Co-Directing Dissertation; Fred Huffer, University Representative; Yanyun Yang, Committee Member; Insu Paek, Committee Member. Educational psychology FSU_migr_etd-5089 http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-5089 This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A183050/datastream/TN/view/Unexpected%20Direction%20of%20Differential%20Item%20Functioning.jpg
collection NDLTD
language English
English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Educational psychology
spellingShingle Educational psychology
Unexpected Direction of Differential Item Functioning
description Many studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of DIF detection methods, when two groups have different ability distributions. Such studies typically have demonstrated factors that are associated with inflation of Type I error rates in DIF detection, such as mean ability differences. However, no study has examined how the direction of DIF is affected by the factors that inflate the Type I error rate. Therefore, this study investigated the possibility that the direction of DIF is systematically detected in an unexpected way, which may result in unexpected detection of DIF advantaging lower ability groups on difficult items. An extensive simulation was conducted to evaluate whether DIF in unexpected directions was observed systematically under the logistic regression approach to DIF detection. Four factors were considered in this study: 1) means of ability distributions, 2) standard deviations of ability distributions, 3) sample sizes, and 4) the magnitude of the pseudo-guessing parameters. Three levels were considered for the ability means, and two levels were considered for the ability standard deviations. Three levels were examined for sample sizes and guessing parameters. As a result, 54 (3 × 2 × 3 × 3) simulation conditions were considered. In addition, items were grouped into five groups depending on their difficulties; very easy, easy, moderate, difficult, and very difficult. The effects of the four simulation factors were evaluated for each one of the five item-difficulty groups. For each condition, 500 replications were conducted. DIF error rates, bias, SE, RMSE, the direction of DIF, and distributions of the biases were examined to evaluate the effects of the four simulation factors. The results revealed that the mean of the ability distribution and the magnitude of the pseudo-guessing parameters indeed contributed dramatically to inflation of DIF error rates, especially for very easy and very difficult items. Moreover, the directions of DIF were all negative for very easy items, but all positive for very difficult items. Finally, limitations and practical implications were discussed. === A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Educational Psychology and Learning Systems in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. === Fall Semester, 2011. === August 4, 2011. === Bias, Differential Item Functioning, Logistic Regression === Includes bibliographical references. === Betsy Jane Becker, Professor Co-Directing Dissertation; Akihito Kamata, Professor Co-Directing Dissertation; Fred Huffer, University Representative; Yanyun Yang, Committee Member; Insu Paek, Committee Member.
author2 Park, Sangwook, 1974- (authoraut)
author_facet Park, Sangwook, 1974- (authoraut)
title Unexpected Direction of Differential Item Functioning
title_short Unexpected Direction of Differential Item Functioning
title_full Unexpected Direction of Differential Item Functioning
title_fullStr Unexpected Direction of Differential Item Functioning
title_full_unstemmed Unexpected Direction of Differential Item Functioning
title_sort unexpected direction of differential item functioning
publisher Florida State University
url http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-5089
_version_ 1719319781940658176