Investigating the Factor Structure of Vocabulary Knowledge
The present study examined four kinds of vocabulary knowledge: Definitional knowledge, using vocabulary in context, relational knowledge, and morphological knowledge. A measure was developed that assessed all four kinds of vocabulary knowledge using the same 23 vocabulary words, which allowed within...
Other Authors: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Florida State University
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-5197 |
id |
ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_183126 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-fsu.edu-oai-fsu.digital.flvc.org-fsu_1831262020-06-16T03:07:36Z Investigating the Factor Structure of Vocabulary Knowledge Spencer, Mercedes (authoraut) Wagner, Richard K. (professor directing thesis) Connor, Carol (committee member) Kaschak, Michael (committee member) Department of Psychology (degree granting department) Florida State University (degree granting institution) Text text Florida State University Florida State University English eng 1 online resource computer application/pdf The present study examined four kinds of vocabulary knowledge: Definitional knowledge, using vocabulary in context, relational knowledge, and morphological knowledge. A measure was developed that assessed all four kinds of vocabulary knowledge using the same 23 vocabulary words, which allowed within- and between-word variance to be modeled. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test three alternative models of vocabulary knowledge: (1) a four-factor model that specified four related yet distinct dimensions of vocabulary knowledge, (2) a two-factor model that considered vocabulary knowledge and morphological knowledge to be two separate but potentially related factors, and (3) a one-factor model in which vocabulary knowledge was unidimensional. These alternative models were examined by modeling both within- and between-word variance. When controlling for extraneous word-level variance, vocabulary knowledge was found to be a relatively unidimensional construct. A Thesis submitted to the Department of Psychology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. Summer Semester, 2012. June 11, 2012. Morphological Awareness, Morphological Knowledge, Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Knowledge, Word Knowledge Includes bibliographical references. Richard K. Wagner, Professor Directing Thesis; Carol Connor, Committee Member; Michael Kaschak, Committee Member. Psychology Neurosciences FSU_migr_etd-5197 http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-5197 This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them. http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu%3A183126/datastream/TN/view/Investigating%20the%20Factor%20Structure%20of%20Vocabulary%20Knowledge.jpg |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Psychology Neurosciences |
spellingShingle |
Psychology Neurosciences Investigating the Factor Structure of Vocabulary Knowledge |
description |
The present study examined four kinds of vocabulary knowledge: Definitional knowledge, using vocabulary in context, relational knowledge, and morphological knowledge. A measure was developed that assessed all four kinds of vocabulary knowledge using the same 23 vocabulary words, which allowed within- and between-word variance to be modeled. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test three alternative models of vocabulary knowledge: (1) a four-factor model that specified four related yet distinct dimensions of vocabulary knowledge, (2) a two-factor model that considered vocabulary knowledge and morphological knowledge to be two separate but potentially related factors, and (3) a one-factor model in which vocabulary knowledge was unidimensional. These alternative models were examined by modeling both within- and between-word variance. When controlling for extraneous word-level variance, vocabulary knowledge was found to be a relatively unidimensional construct. === A Thesis submitted to the Department of Psychology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. === Summer Semester, 2012. === June 11, 2012. === Morphological Awareness, Morphological Knowledge, Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary Knowledge, Word Knowledge === Includes bibliographical references. === Richard K. Wagner, Professor Directing Thesis; Carol Connor, Committee Member; Michael Kaschak, Committee Member. |
author2 |
Spencer, Mercedes (authoraut) |
author_facet |
Spencer, Mercedes (authoraut) |
title |
Investigating the Factor Structure of Vocabulary Knowledge |
title_short |
Investigating the Factor Structure of Vocabulary Knowledge |
title_full |
Investigating the Factor Structure of Vocabulary Knowledge |
title_fullStr |
Investigating the Factor Structure of Vocabulary Knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed |
Investigating the Factor Structure of Vocabulary Knowledge |
title_sort |
investigating the factor structure of vocabulary knowledge |
publisher |
Florida State University |
url |
http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-5197 |
_version_ |
1719319798016376832 |