The effect of intermittent, mechanical cervical traction in the chiropractic management of mechanical neck pain

Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, 1998. === Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness of two seemingly different approaches to manipulation of the cervi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wood, Timothy George
Other Authors: Mathews, Robert
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2119
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-dut-oai-ir.dut.ac.za-10321-2119
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-dut-oai-ir.dut.ac.za-10321-21192017-04-13T04:21:09Z The effect of intermittent, mechanical cervical traction in the chiropractic management of mechanical neck pain Wood, Timothy George Mathews, Robert Chiropractic Neck pain--Chiropractic treatment Manipulation (Therapeutics) Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, 1998. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness of two seemingly different approaches to manipulation of the cervical spine in the treatment of cervical spine dysfunction. The researcher postulated that a manual manipulation would have a greater effect in reducing pain and increasing range of motion that accompanies cervical dysfunction than an instrumental, low force, high velocity thrust delivered by means of an Activator Adjusting Instrument. The reason for this is that it provides greater joint movement. Methods This randomised controlled trial consisted of two treatment groups. Each group consisted of 15 subjects, between the ages of 16 and 65 years, selected from the general population and randomly allocated to treatment group A or B. Group A received instrumental thrusts delivered by an Activator Adjusting Instrument (AAI), while group B received standard diversified manual manipulations to the dysfunctional joints in the cervical spine. Each subject was assessed by using subjective measures of the CMCC Neck Disability Index, Numerical Pain Rating Scale and McGill Short- Form questionnaire; and the objective measure of degrees of cervical range of motion obtained using a cervical goniometer (CROM). Two tailed statistical analysis was conducted at a = 0.05, using the non-parametric Wilcoxin Signed Rank Test and the Mann-Whitney U Test comparing intra-group and inter-group data respectively. Further assessment of the data was conducted using power analysis. This data as well as the descriptive statistics were presented in tables and bar charts. M 2017-01-31T06:49:02Z 2017-01-31T06:49:02Z 1998 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2119 en 139 p DIT28253
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Chiropractic
Neck pain--Chiropractic treatment
Manipulation (Therapeutics)
spellingShingle Chiropractic
Neck pain--Chiropractic treatment
Manipulation (Therapeutics)
Wood, Timothy George
The effect of intermittent, mechanical cervical traction in the chiropractic management of mechanical neck pain
description Dissertation submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master's Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Technikon Natal, 1998. === Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative effectiveness of two seemingly different approaches to manipulation of the cervical spine in the treatment of cervical spine dysfunction. The researcher postulated that a manual manipulation would have a greater effect in reducing pain and increasing range of motion that accompanies cervical dysfunction than an instrumental, low force, high velocity thrust delivered by means of an Activator Adjusting Instrument. The reason for this is that it provides greater joint movement. Methods This randomised controlled trial consisted of two treatment groups. Each group consisted of 15 subjects, between the ages of 16 and 65 years, selected from the general population and randomly allocated to treatment group A or B. Group A received instrumental thrusts delivered by an Activator Adjusting Instrument (AAI), while group B received standard diversified manual manipulations to the dysfunctional joints in the cervical spine. Each subject was assessed by using subjective measures of the CMCC Neck Disability Index, Numerical Pain Rating Scale and McGill Short- Form questionnaire; and the objective measure of degrees of cervical range of motion obtained using a cervical goniometer (CROM). Two tailed statistical analysis was conducted at a = 0.05, using the non-parametric Wilcoxin Signed Rank Test and the Mann-Whitney U Test comparing intra-group and inter-group data respectively. Further assessment of the data was conducted using power analysis. This data as well as the descriptive statistics were presented in tables and bar charts. === M
author2 Mathews, Robert
author_facet Mathews, Robert
Wood, Timothy George
author Wood, Timothy George
author_sort Wood, Timothy George
title The effect of intermittent, mechanical cervical traction in the chiropractic management of mechanical neck pain
title_short The effect of intermittent, mechanical cervical traction in the chiropractic management of mechanical neck pain
title_full The effect of intermittent, mechanical cervical traction in the chiropractic management of mechanical neck pain
title_fullStr The effect of intermittent, mechanical cervical traction in the chiropractic management of mechanical neck pain
title_full_unstemmed The effect of intermittent, mechanical cervical traction in the chiropractic management of mechanical neck pain
title_sort effect of intermittent, mechanical cervical traction in the chiropractic management of mechanical neck pain
publishDate 2017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10321/2119
work_keys_str_mv AT woodtimothygeorge theeffectofintermittentmechanicalcervicaltractioninthechiropracticmanagementofmechanicalneckpain
AT woodtimothygeorge effectofintermittentmechanicalcervicaltractioninthechiropracticmanagementofmechanicalneckpain
_version_ 1718437660141289472