Building friendships between Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups in Zimbabwe

Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Public Management (Peacebuilding), Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2016. === Despite all the public pretences of projecting a united country, Zimbabwe is a divided country and this has made gen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muchemwa, Cyprian
Other Authors: Harris, Geoffrey Thomas
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10321/1532
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-dut-oai-localhost-10321-1532
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-dut-oai-localhost-10321-15322016-06-11T03:58:51Z Building friendships between Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups in Zimbabwe Muchemwa, Cyprian Harris, Geoffrey Thomas Kaye, Sylvia Ndebele (African people)--Zimbabwe Shona (African people)--Zimbabwe Indigenous peoples--Zimbabwe--Race relations Ethnology--Zimbabwe Indigenous peoples--Zimbabwe Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Public Management (Peacebuilding), Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2016. Despite all the public pretences of projecting a united country, Zimbabwe is a divided country and this has made genuine peace and unity very difficult to attain. The bruised and polarised relationship between the Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups is deeply rooted in the annals of history, which makes it a protracted social conflict. The Gukurahundi campaign between 1982 and 1987 was part of a chain of catastrophic events, which have emanated from a well-established culture of violence and intolerance between Shona and Ndebele. Efforts to address this culture using a top-down approach under the auspices of the 22 December 1987 Unity Accord did little to curb hostilities. Even though these efforts were commendable, they were not sufficient to make any significant inroads into the polarised relationship of mistrust between the two groups. This thesis applied an Action Research design and specifically used the Transcend dialogue method to explore the possibilities of building mutual respect and understanding among a small sample of young Shona and Ndebele participants. The research found that creating intentional platforms for interaction could have a positive transformative effect on relationships. It is not too late to create more spaces and transformational platforms for people to dialogue, to listen to each other, to share stories, and carry out projects together. Engagement using dialogue can create new synergies, which can make a worthwhile difference to the long journey towards (re) building broken bridges and building new bridges. D 2016-06-08T07:17:38Z 2016-06-08T07:17:38Z 2016 Thesis 657456 http://hdl.handle.net/10321/1532 en 289 p
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Ndebele (African people)--Zimbabwe
Shona (African people)--Zimbabwe
Indigenous peoples--Zimbabwe--Race relations
Ethnology--Zimbabwe
Indigenous peoples--Zimbabwe
spellingShingle Ndebele (African people)--Zimbabwe
Shona (African people)--Zimbabwe
Indigenous peoples--Zimbabwe--Race relations
Ethnology--Zimbabwe
Indigenous peoples--Zimbabwe
Muchemwa, Cyprian
Building friendships between Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups in Zimbabwe
description Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Public Management (Peacebuilding), Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa, 2016. === Despite all the public pretences of projecting a united country, Zimbabwe is a divided country and this has made genuine peace and unity very difficult to attain. The bruised and polarised relationship between the Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups is deeply rooted in the annals of history, which makes it a protracted social conflict. The Gukurahundi campaign between 1982 and 1987 was part of a chain of catastrophic events, which have emanated from a well-established culture of violence and intolerance between Shona and Ndebele. Efforts to address this culture using a top-down approach under the auspices of the 22 December 1987 Unity Accord did little to curb hostilities. Even though these efforts were commendable, they were not sufficient to make any significant inroads into the polarised relationship of mistrust between the two groups. This thesis applied an Action Research design and specifically used the Transcend dialogue method to explore the possibilities of building mutual respect and understanding among a small sample of young Shona and Ndebele participants. The research found that creating intentional platforms for interaction could have a positive transformative effect on relationships. It is not too late to create more spaces and transformational platforms for people to dialogue, to listen to each other, to share stories, and carry out projects together. Engagement using dialogue can create new synergies, which can make a worthwhile difference to the long journey towards (re) building broken bridges and building new bridges. === D
author2 Harris, Geoffrey Thomas
author_facet Harris, Geoffrey Thomas
Muchemwa, Cyprian
author Muchemwa, Cyprian
author_sort Muchemwa, Cyprian
title Building friendships between Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups in Zimbabwe
title_short Building friendships between Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups in Zimbabwe
title_full Building friendships between Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups in Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Building friendships between Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups in Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Building friendships between Shona and Ndebele ethnic groups in Zimbabwe
title_sort building friendships between shona and ndebele ethnic groups in zimbabwe
publishDate 2016
url http://hdl.handle.net/10321/1532
work_keys_str_mv AT muchemwacyprian buildingfriendshipsbetweenshonaandndebeleethnicgroupsinzimbabwe
_version_ 1718301697572339712