Dominant and non-dominant group's perceptions of the government-led economic transformation process in South Africa: report

The enormous social, economic, and political government-led societal transformation South Africans have experienced over the past 15 years have brought about numerous societal and identity changes. The aim of the present study was to explore how dominant (White participants) and non-dominant (Black...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dlamini, Thobile G. K
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Rhodes University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1002472
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-rhodes-vital-2963
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-rhodes-vital-29632017-07-20T04:13:38ZDominant and non-dominant group's perceptions of the government-led economic transformation process in South Africa: reportDlamini, Thobile G. KGroup identity -- South AfricaPost-apartheid era -- South AfricaSouth Africa -- Ethnic relationsSocial change -- South AfricaSouth Africa -- Social conditions -- 1994-South Africa -- Economic conditions -- 1991-The enormous social, economic, and political government-led societal transformation South Africans have experienced over the past 15 years have brought about numerous societal and identity changes. The aim of the present study was to explore how dominant (White participants) and non-dominant (Black participants) groups experiencing the government-led societal transformation process deal with perceptions of intergroup differences based on Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979, 1986) and related field research. Social Identity Theory predicts that in the presence of intergroup differences group members irrespective of their status position will apply identity management strategies to either improve or maintain their status position. The relationships between perceptions of intergroup relations and identity management strategies as proposed by Social Identity Theory were tested studying 170 second year Rhodes University psychology students. Sixty participants indicated themselves as Black South Africans (representing non-dominant group) and 110 participants identified themselves as White South Africans (dominant group). The results revealed that dominant and non-dominant groups differ systematically regarding the functional interaction between beliefs about the intergroup situation and identity management strategies. The results of the study indicate too, that ingroup identification differentiates between individual and collective strategies irrespective of the group’s status position.Rhodes UniversityFaculty of Humanities, Psychology2009ThesisMastersMA60 leavespdfvital:2963http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1002472EnglishDlamini, Thobile G. K
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Group identity -- South Africa
Post-apartheid era -- South Africa
South Africa -- Ethnic relations
Social change -- South Africa
South Africa -- Social conditions -- 1994-
South Africa -- Economic conditions -- 1991-
spellingShingle Group identity -- South Africa
Post-apartheid era -- South Africa
South Africa -- Ethnic relations
Social change -- South Africa
South Africa -- Social conditions -- 1994-
South Africa -- Economic conditions -- 1991-
Dlamini, Thobile G. K
Dominant and non-dominant group's perceptions of the government-led economic transformation process in South Africa: report
description The enormous social, economic, and political government-led societal transformation South Africans have experienced over the past 15 years have brought about numerous societal and identity changes. The aim of the present study was to explore how dominant (White participants) and non-dominant (Black participants) groups experiencing the government-led societal transformation process deal with perceptions of intergroup differences based on Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979, 1986) and related field research. Social Identity Theory predicts that in the presence of intergroup differences group members irrespective of their status position will apply identity management strategies to either improve or maintain their status position. The relationships between perceptions of intergroup relations and identity management strategies as proposed by Social Identity Theory were tested studying 170 second year Rhodes University psychology students. Sixty participants indicated themselves as Black South Africans (representing non-dominant group) and 110 participants identified themselves as White South Africans (dominant group). The results revealed that dominant and non-dominant groups differ systematically regarding the functional interaction between beliefs about the intergroup situation and identity management strategies. The results of the study indicate too, that ingroup identification differentiates between individual and collective strategies irrespective of the group’s status position.
author Dlamini, Thobile G. K
author_facet Dlamini, Thobile G. K
author_sort Dlamini, Thobile G. K
title Dominant and non-dominant group's perceptions of the government-led economic transformation process in South Africa: report
title_short Dominant and non-dominant group's perceptions of the government-led economic transformation process in South Africa: report
title_full Dominant and non-dominant group's perceptions of the government-led economic transformation process in South Africa: report
title_fullStr Dominant and non-dominant group's perceptions of the government-led economic transformation process in South Africa: report
title_full_unstemmed Dominant and non-dominant group's perceptions of the government-led economic transformation process in South Africa: report
title_sort dominant and non-dominant group's perceptions of the government-led economic transformation process in south africa: report
publisher Rhodes University
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1002472
work_keys_str_mv AT dlaminithobilegk dominantandnondominantgroupsperceptionsofthegovernmentledeconomictransformationprocessinsouthafricareport
_version_ 1718501483344822272