The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa

We review and synthesize recent South African work that examines the role and importance of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in the daily lives of rural people in South Africa. The most commonly used such products are wild spinaches, fuelwood, wooden utensils edible fruits, grass hand-brushes, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shackleton, Charlie, Shackleton, Sheona
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: 2004
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007061
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-rhodes-vital-6650
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-rhodes-vital-66502018-12-11T04:30:24ZThe importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South AfricaShackleton, CharlieShackleton, SheonaWe review and synthesize recent South African work that examines the role and importance of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in the daily lives of rural people in South Africa. The most commonly used such products are wild spinaches, fuelwood, wooden utensils edible fruits, grass hand-brushes, and twig hand-brushes, used by 85% or more of households. More than half the households investigated also make use of edible insects, wood for construction, bushmeat, wild honey and reeds for weaving. Individual households may exploit dozens of animal and plant species. The range in annual, direct-use values is large, from less than R1000 per household per year to over R12 000. The value to rural households is manifest through a daily net function which represents a cost saving to the families involved and to the state, as well as through an emergency net, which serves as an insurance in times of misfortune, such as drought, disease, and unexpected economic hardship. The emergency net function has hardly been quantified in South Africa and internationally. Ad hoc trade in NTFPs is a common emergency net, which in some instances evolves into a permanent way of life. Financial returns from trade are variable, depending on resource type and hours worked, but are typically low. Despite the small cash incomes from trade, they provide an important contribution that complement the diverse livelihood strategies within a household, especially for the poorer sectors of rural society. Moreover, there are non-financial benefits of NTFP trade that are commonly overlooked.2004Article7 pagespdfvital:6650http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007061English
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description We review and synthesize recent South African work that examines the role and importance of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) in the daily lives of rural people in South Africa. The most commonly used such products are wild spinaches, fuelwood, wooden utensils edible fruits, grass hand-brushes, and twig hand-brushes, used by 85% or more of households. More than half the households investigated also make use of edible insects, wood for construction, bushmeat, wild honey and reeds for weaving. Individual households may exploit dozens of animal and plant species. The range in annual, direct-use values is large, from less than R1000 per household per year to over R12 000. The value to rural households is manifest through a daily net function which represents a cost saving to the families involved and to the state, as well as through an emergency net, which serves as an insurance in times of misfortune, such as drought, disease, and unexpected economic hardship. The emergency net function has hardly been quantified in South Africa and internationally. Ad hoc trade in NTFPs is a common emergency net, which in some instances evolves into a permanent way of life. Financial returns from trade are variable, depending on resource type and hours worked, but are typically low. Despite the small cash incomes from trade, they provide an important contribution that complement the diverse livelihood strategies within a household, especially for the poorer sectors of rural society. Moreover, there are non-financial benefits of NTFP trade that are commonly overlooked. ===
author Shackleton, Charlie
Shackleton, Sheona
spellingShingle Shackleton, Charlie
Shackleton, Sheona
The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa
author_facet Shackleton, Charlie
Shackleton, Sheona
author_sort Shackleton, Charlie
title The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa
title_short The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa
title_full The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa
title_fullStr The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa
title_full_unstemmed The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa
title_sort importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from south africa
publishDate 2004
url http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007061
work_keys_str_mv AT shackletoncharlie theimportanceofnontimberforestproductsinrurallivelihoodsecurityandassafetynetsareviewofevidencefromsouthafrica
AT shackletonsheona theimportanceofnontimberforestproductsinrurallivelihoodsecurityandassafetynetsareviewofevidencefromsouthafrica
AT shackletoncharlie importanceofnontimberforestproductsinrurallivelihoodsecurityandassafetynetsareviewofevidencefromsouthafrica
AT shackletonsheona importanceofnontimberforestproductsinrurallivelihoodsecurityandassafetynetsareviewofevidencefromsouthafrica
_version_ 1718801395844382720