Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br.

Includes bibliographic references. === Detailed variation studies of 23 species of the genus Eulopbia R. Br. (Orchidaceae) indicate that six taxa may be upheld as distinct species, together with two or possibly three intraspecific taxa, whose status can only be assessed on the basis of further field...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hall, A V
Other Authors: Schelpe, E A C L E
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: University of Cape Town 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11427/10664
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-10664
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-106642020-10-06T05:10:58Z Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br. Hall, A V Schelpe, E A C L E Science Includes bibliographic references. Detailed variation studies of 23 species of the genus Eulopbia R. Br. (Orchidaceae) indicate that six taxa may be upheld as distinct species, together with two or possibly three intraspecific taxa, whose status can only be assessed on the basis of further field work. It is considered highly likely that the remaining 17 taxa should be relegated to the synonymy of the six species upheld, possibly together with a further eight doubtfully distinct species of which only descriptions were available. 2014-12-30T19:56:47Z 2014-12-30T19:56:47Z 1959 Master Thesis Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/10664 eng application/pdf University of Cape Town Faculty of Science Department of Biological Sciences
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Science
spellingShingle Science
Hall, A V
Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br.
description Includes bibliographic references. === Detailed variation studies of 23 species of the genus Eulopbia R. Br. (Orchidaceae) indicate that six taxa may be upheld as distinct species, together with two or possibly three intraspecific taxa, whose status can only be assessed on the basis of further field work. It is considered highly likely that the remaining 17 taxa should be relegated to the synonymy of the six species upheld, possibly together with a further eight doubtfully distinct species of which only descriptions were available.
author2 Schelpe, E A C L E
author_facet Schelpe, E A C L E
Hall, A V
author Hall, A V
author_sort Hall, A V
title Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br.
title_short Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br.
title_full Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br.
title_fullStr Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br.
title_full_unstemmed Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br.
title_sort studies in the genus eulophia r. br.
publisher University of Cape Town
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/10664
work_keys_str_mv AT hallav studiesinthegenuseulophiarbr
_version_ 1719347572748845056