Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br.
Includes bibliographic references. === Detailed variation studies of 23 species of the genus Eulopbia R. Br. (Orchidaceae) indicate that six taxa may be upheld as distinct species, together with two or possibly three intraspecific taxa, whose status can only be assessed on the basis of further field...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Dissertation |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Cape Town
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/10664 |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-10664 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-106642020-10-06T05:10:58Z Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br. Hall, A V Schelpe, E A C L E Science Includes bibliographic references. Detailed variation studies of 23 species of the genus Eulopbia R. Br. (Orchidaceae) indicate that six taxa may be upheld as distinct species, together with two or possibly three intraspecific taxa, whose status can only be assessed on the basis of further field work. It is considered highly likely that the remaining 17 taxa should be relegated to the synonymy of the six species upheld, possibly together with a further eight doubtfully distinct species of which only descriptions were available. 2014-12-30T19:56:47Z 2014-12-30T19:56:47Z 1959 Master Thesis Masters MSc http://hdl.handle.net/11427/10664 eng application/pdf University of Cape Town Faculty of Science Department of Biological Sciences |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Dissertation |
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Science |
spellingShingle |
Science Hall, A V Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br. |
description |
Includes bibliographic references. === Detailed variation studies of 23 species of the genus Eulopbia R. Br. (Orchidaceae) indicate that six taxa may be upheld as distinct species, together with two or possibly three intraspecific taxa, whose status can only be assessed on the basis of further field work. It is considered highly likely that the remaining 17 taxa should be relegated to the synonymy of the six species upheld, possibly together with a further eight doubtfully distinct species of which only descriptions were available. |
author2 |
Schelpe, E A C L E |
author_facet |
Schelpe, E A C L E Hall, A V |
author |
Hall, A V |
author_sort |
Hall, A V |
title |
Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br. |
title_short |
Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br. |
title_full |
Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br. |
title_fullStr |
Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Studies in the genus Eulophia R. Br. |
title_sort |
studies in the genus eulophia r. br. |
publisher |
University of Cape Town |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11427/10664 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hallav studiesinthegenuseulophiarbr |
_version_ |
1719347572748845056 |