Suggested reasons for the failure of judicial management as a business rescue mechanism in South African law
Includes bibliographical references. === In 1926, the South African Parliament introduced a procedure known as judicial management. It was housed in the Companies Act 46 of 1926 (hereafter Companies Act 1926). The purpose of judicial management was to enable a failing company to restructure thus pro...
Main Author: | Ofwono, Frederick Ian |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Bradstreet, Richard |
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Cape Town
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/12904 |
Similar Items
-
Business rescue for Zambia: suggestions for legislative reform
by: Kaulungombe, Kaluba Gloria
Published: (2015) -
Does the role and duties of the business rescue practitioner as conferred by the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008 give rise to conflicts with respect to the powers and duties of directors during business rescue proceedings?
by: Kaudeer, Ashirah Bibi
Published: (2016) -
Priority issues in business rescue
by: Prins, Deon
Published: (2016) -
Business rescue in South Africa and its practical application to SME's (small to medium enterprises)
by: Maphiri, Mikovhe Comfort
Published: (2016) -
The basis and boundaries of employee fiduciary duties in South African common law
by: Idensohn, Kathleen
Published: (2015)