How comparative laws of foreign jurisdictions may be used by South African courts to find the fair value of shares when shareholders use the appraisal remedy provided for in s 164 of the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008
A set method of determination of the fair value of shares is omitted from s164 of the South African Companies Act 71 of 2008 (the South African Act), which deals with the appraisal remedies of dissenting shareholders. This dissertation will consider how courts in the United Kingdom and the United St...
Main Author: | Havenga, Kelsey |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Idensohn, Kathy |
Format: | Dissertation |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Cape Town
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/11427/19739 |
Similar Items
-
The protection of minority shareholders in South Africa: a reflection on the derivative action, appraisal rights and oppression remedy
by: Mhembere, Tarisai Valerie
Published: (2020) -
A comparative analysis of shareholders' appraisal rights in Nigeria and South Africa
by: Eniola, Abimbola
Published: (2020) -
The triangular merger structures: the use of the forward and reverse triangular merger structures to circumvent the voting and appraisal rights of minority shareholders and potential shareholder remedies
by: Kershoff, Marko Daniel
Published: (2015) -
A textual analysis of section 164 of the Companies Act 71 of 2008
by: Pike, Adam
Published: (2014) -
Interpretation of fiscal statutes by the courts: a South African tax law perspective
by: Kafesu, Lovemore Takudzwa
Published: (2015)