Firm Financial Performance in The Global 1000: Does Human Capital Effectiveness Matter?

Organisations worldwide spend a substantial proportion of revenue on salaries and benefits (compensation) as an investment in employees who are regarded as human capital. The justification behind this investment is the theoretical assertion that investments in human capital predict financial perform...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Raghubeer, Sandhia
Other Authors: de Kock, Francois
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: University of Cape Town 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29286
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-29286
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-292862020-10-06T05:11:41Z Firm Financial Performance in The Global 1000: Does Human Capital Effectiveness Matter? Raghubeer, Sandhia de Kock, Francois Organisational Psychology Organisations worldwide spend a substantial proportion of revenue on salaries and benefits (compensation) as an investment in employees who are regarded as human capital. The justification behind this investment is the theoretical assertion that investments in human capital predict financial performance but empirical support for this relationship is limited. The present study contributes to the extant literature by examining the relationship between human capital effectiveness (HCE) and financial performance. A further contribution of the research is to consider alternative criteria of financial performance as findings may be dependent on operationalisation of the criterion. The relationships we tested were between Human Capital Return on Investment (HCROI) and (1) Return on Assets and (2) Return on Equity. Drawing on the Resource Based View theory, we conducted a study using 10 years of data from a sample that comprised the Global 1000 (highest revenue, listed firms domiciled across 45 countries). We used a retrospective correlational study. Spearman Correlation (rs) analysis revealed significant effects for the relationships we investigated in all years. Moreover, meta-analysis showed these effects to be significant on average across the 10 years, showing moderate strength and relative stability. A corollary of the study is that we established global benchmarks for HCROI and provided the first empirical evidence that supports a positive relationship between HCE and financial performance. These findings may be useful to investors who seek possible indicators of expected financial performance from HCE. In doing so, the study suggests we should expand financial reporting to include HCE indicators. Implications of findings and study limitations are noted. 2019-02-05T06:50:05Z 2019-02-05T06:50:05Z 2018 2019-01-31T12:12:38Z Master Thesis Masters MCom http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29286 eng application/pdf University of Cape Town Faculty of Commerce School of Management Studies
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Organisational Psychology
spellingShingle Organisational Psychology
Raghubeer, Sandhia
Firm Financial Performance in The Global 1000: Does Human Capital Effectiveness Matter?
description Organisations worldwide spend a substantial proportion of revenue on salaries and benefits (compensation) as an investment in employees who are regarded as human capital. The justification behind this investment is the theoretical assertion that investments in human capital predict financial performance but empirical support for this relationship is limited. The present study contributes to the extant literature by examining the relationship between human capital effectiveness (HCE) and financial performance. A further contribution of the research is to consider alternative criteria of financial performance as findings may be dependent on operationalisation of the criterion. The relationships we tested were between Human Capital Return on Investment (HCROI) and (1) Return on Assets and (2) Return on Equity. Drawing on the Resource Based View theory, we conducted a study using 10 years of data from a sample that comprised the Global 1000 (highest revenue, listed firms domiciled across 45 countries). We used a retrospective correlational study. Spearman Correlation (rs) analysis revealed significant effects for the relationships we investigated in all years. Moreover, meta-analysis showed these effects to be significant on average across the 10 years, showing moderate strength and relative stability. A corollary of the study is that we established global benchmarks for HCROI and provided the first empirical evidence that supports a positive relationship between HCE and financial performance. These findings may be useful to investors who seek possible indicators of expected financial performance from HCE. In doing so, the study suggests we should expand financial reporting to include HCE indicators. Implications of findings and study limitations are noted.
author2 de Kock, Francois
author_facet de Kock, Francois
Raghubeer, Sandhia
author Raghubeer, Sandhia
author_sort Raghubeer, Sandhia
title Firm Financial Performance in The Global 1000: Does Human Capital Effectiveness Matter?
title_short Firm Financial Performance in The Global 1000: Does Human Capital Effectiveness Matter?
title_full Firm Financial Performance in The Global 1000: Does Human Capital Effectiveness Matter?
title_fullStr Firm Financial Performance in The Global 1000: Does Human Capital Effectiveness Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Firm Financial Performance in The Global 1000: Does Human Capital Effectiveness Matter?
title_sort firm financial performance in the global 1000: does human capital effectiveness matter?
publisher University of Cape Town
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/29286
work_keys_str_mv AT raghubeersandhia firmfinancialperformanceintheglobal1000doeshumancapitaleffectivenessmatter
_version_ 1719350539984044032