Towards sustainable microfinance: The case of Capitec Bank and Grameen Bank

This thesis investigates the level of sustainability of two microfinance institutions (MFIs): Grameen Bank of Bangladesh and Capitec Bank of South Africa. Data from 2004 to 2013 is used in this study employing internationally accepted sustainability criteria, namely, the Small Enterprise Education a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Verryn, Annette
Other Authors: Biekpe, Nicholas
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Commerce 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30219
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-30219
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-uct-oai-localhost-11427-302192020-07-22T05:07:30Z Towards sustainable microfinance: The case of Capitec Bank and Grameen Bank Verryn, Annette Biekpe, Nicholas Development Finance This thesis investigates the level of sustainability of two microfinance institutions (MFIs): Grameen Bank of Bangladesh and Capitec Bank of South Africa. Data from 2004 to 2013 is used in this study employing internationally accepted sustainability criteria, namely, the Small Enterprise Education and Promotion (SEEP) 2010 Microfinance Financial Reporting Standards (MFRS) and the SEEP Framework of 2005. The results of this study indicate that although the operations of both microfinance institutions are sustainable, Capitec Bank exhibits a higher level of sustainability as compared to Grameen Bank. This is evidenced by Capitec Bank’s higher levels of profitability, capital adequacy and solvency, operational self-sufficiency, and healthier asset portfolio. This finding underlines South Africa’s financial sector’s stability, institutional quality, competitive market, and solid regulatory framework. The sustainability criteria suggest that Capitec Bank and other South African MFIs should heed Grameen Bank’s low ROE and insufficient capital adequacy and solvency measures. Ensuring healthy and strategic lending portfolios gives a good ROE for a firm’s shareholders. Furthermore, the capital adequacy and solvency ratios have important implications for an institution’s capital structure. Therefore, Capitec and South African MFIs should maintain healthy ROE, capital adequacy and solvency ratios in order to ensure their long-term sustainability. As future research, it would be useful if data were made available to enable an assessment of a failed South African MFI to obtain clearer insight into the South African microfinance sector. Furthermore, data on Grameen and Capitec’s asset quality and social performance will give additional insight into the social sustainability of these two MFIs. 2019-06-19T10:35:04Z 2019-06-19T10:35:04Z 2015 2019-06-19T10:34:39Z Masters Thesis Masters http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30219 eng application/pdf Faculty of Commerce Graduate School of Business (GSB)
collection NDLTD
language English
format Dissertation
sources NDLTD
topic Development Finance
spellingShingle Development Finance
Verryn, Annette
Towards sustainable microfinance: The case of Capitec Bank and Grameen Bank
description This thesis investigates the level of sustainability of two microfinance institutions (MFIs): Grameen Bank of Bangladesh and Capitec Bank of South Africa. Data from 2004 to 2013 is used in this study employing internationally accepted sustainability criteria, namely, the Small Enterprise Education and Promotion (SEEP) 2010 Microfinance Financial Reporting Standards (MFRS) and the SEEP Framework of 2005. The results of this study indicate that although the operations of both microfinance institutions are sustainable, Capitec Bank exhibits a higher level of sustainability as compared to Grameen Bank. This is evidenced by Capitec Bank’s higher levels of profitability, capital adequacy and solvency, operational self-sufficiency, and healthier asset portfolio. This finding underlines South Africa’s financial sector’s stability, institutional quality, competitive market, and solid regulatory framework. The sustainability criteria suggest that Capitec Bank and other South African MFIs should heed Grameen Bank’s low ROE and insufficient capital adequacy and solvency measures. Ensuring healthy and strategic lending portfolios gives a good ROE for a firm’s shareholders. Furthermore, the capital adequacy and solvency ratios have important implications for an institution’s capital structure. Therefore, Capitec and South African MFIs should maintain healthy ROE, capital adequacy and solvency ratios in order to ensure their long-term sustainability. As future research, it would be useful if data were made available to enable an assessment of a failed South African MFI to obtain clearer insight into the South African microfinance sector. Furthermore, data on Grameen and Capitec’s asset quality and social performance will give additional insight into the social sustainability of these two MFIs.
author2 Biekpe, Nicholas
author_facet Biekpe, Nicholas
Verryn, Annette
author Verryn, Annette
author_sort Verryn, Annette
title Towards sustainable microfinance: The case of Capitec Bank and Grameen Bank
title_short Towards sustainable microfinance: The case of Capitec Bank and Grameen Bank
title_full Towards sustainable microfinance: The case of Capitec Bank and Grameen Bank
title_fullStr Towards sustainable microfinance: The case of Capitec Bank and Grameen Bank
title_full_unstemmed Towards sustainable microfinance: The case of Capitec Bank and Grameen Bank
title_sort towards sustainable microfinance: the case of capitec bank and grameen bank
publisher Faculty of Commerce
publishDate 2019
url http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30219
work_keys_str_mv AT verrynannette towardssustainablemicrofinancethecaseofcapitecbankandgrameenbank
_version_ 1719330265514377216