A survey of the most commonly used diagnostic methods used by the chiropractors in Gauteng, South Africa for detecting adjustable lesions

• Main Author: Dold, Raymond Gilbert
• Published: 2010
• Subjects: Chiropractic diagnosis; Chiropractic diagnosis treatment; Chiropractors in South Africa
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/10210/3097

M. Tech. === The main purpose of this study was: • To determine the different diagnostic techniques chiropractors use in Gauteng South Africa. Objectives included: • To determine chiropractics attitude and opinions regarding the different Diagnostic Techniques they use in their practices. • To determine any statistically significantly correlations between answers. • To develop a demographic profile of Chiropractors in Gauteng South Africa. In the world today there are 80 000 chiropractors who are the primary physicians performing manipulations in order to treat problems such as lower back pain. Incidentally 85% of the western world will suffer from at some stage of their lives (Hecker and Daniel, 2004). The identification of the common functional and structural components of the adjustable lesion is critical to the management of these conditions. Unfortunately it has also contributed to the misconception that all manipulative disorders have the same pathological basis (Bergman, 2002). A questionnaire-based study comprising a non-probabilistic, non-random, convenience sample was used to determine the diagnostic techniques used v by the chiropractors actively practicing in Gauteng South Africa. A total of 58 Chiropractors responded to the questionnaire, forming the sample population that was used to calculate results. According to this study, all the responding chiropractors practicing here in Gauteng South Africa (n=58/58 100%), examine the spine to identify areas or subluxations that require adjustments/manipulation. There are a variety of diagnostic techniques methods that they use in everyday practice. Most commonly motion palpation(96.5%), static palpation(93.1%), pain description of the patient(82.8%), leg length discrepancy(55%), neurological tests(77.6%), visual postural analysis(61.4%), orthopedic tests(75%), plain static and stress x-rays(44.5%) and kinesiology muscle testing(10.4%) are used. The perceived reliability of these diagnostic techniques are also considered to be good.