The construction of optimal drape surfaces with constrained first and second derivatives

The need to construct optimal drape surfaces arises in airborne geophysical surveys where it is necessary to fly a safe distance above the ground and within the performance limits of the aircraft used, but as close as possible to the surface. The problem is formulated as an LP with constraints at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fossati, Reiner Justin
Other Authors: Wolvaardt, J.S.
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1541
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-unisa-oai-umkn-dsp01.int.unisa.ac.za-10500-1541
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-unisa-oai-umkn-dsp01.int.unisa.ac.za-10500-15412016-04-16T04:07:51Z The construction of optimal drape surfaces with constrained first and second derivatives Fossati, Reiner Justin Wolvaardt, J.S. Drape surface Airborne geophysical surveying Linear programming Gridding Thimbles Heuristic LP methods Constrained derivatives Topographic modelling 622.153 Magnetic prospecting The need to construct optimal drape surfaces arises in airborne geophysical surveys where it is necessary to fly a safe distance above the ground and within the performance limits of the aircraft used, but as close as possible to the surface. The problem is formulated as an LP with constraints at every point of a grid covering the area concerned, yielding a very large problem. The objective of the LP is to create as "good" a surface as possible. This formulation is new, as previous methods did not aim to minimise an objective function. If the desired surface has only slope limitations, the resulting drape surface must be constrained in the first derivative. Such a drape surface is readily constructed using the Lifting Algoritlun. It is shown that the Litling Algorithm is both exact and has great speed advantages. Some numerical results confinning exacmcss and speed are presented, as is the algorithm's analogy to a flow network method. An enhanced lifting method with a better order of complexity is also proposed and tested numerically. In most practical situations a drape surface is required which has both first and second derivatives constrained. If only a cut through such a surface is considered, the problem can be solved with relative ease by exploiting its nctwork~Jike structure. This method fonns the basis of one of the preferred heuristics developed later. It was not possible to generalise this method to a full two~dimensional drape surface. A commercially available LP package fares better in finding the optimal solution. Several heuristic methods were examined. first a general heuristic method based on a lifting approach was developed. This was followed by a method using repeated application of the method used for sections (the Alternating One-dimensional Dual Algorithm ["AODA"]). Three heuristics based on thimbles were also designed. Thimbles are caps whose first and second derivatives are acceptable and which are placed over local infeasibilities in the topography The work ends with a chapter comparing the efficiency of various heuristics and comparing the results obtained using a number of test datasets. It was fOLmd that heuristic methods provide acceptable drape surfaces and that the choice lies between speed and accuracy, with a previously designed smoothing method being the fastesl and the AODA the most accurate and quick enough. Operations Research D.Phil. 2009-08-25T10:54:12Z 2009-08-25T10:54:12Z 2003-01 2003-01-31 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1541 en 1 online resource (vi, 167 leaves)
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Drape surface
Airborne geophysical surveying
Linear programming
Gridding
Thimbles
Heuristic LP methods
Constrained derivatives
Topographic modelling
622.153
Magnetic prospecting
spellingShingle Drape surface
Airborne geophysical surveying
Linear programming
Gridding
Thimbles
Heuristic LP methods
Constrained derivatives
Topographic modelling
622.153
Magnetic prospecting
Fossati, Reiner Justin
The construction of optimal drape surfaces with constrained first and second derivatives
description The need to construct optimal drape surfaces arises in airborne geophysical surveys where it is necessary to fly a safe distance above the ground and within the performance limits of the aircraft used, but as close as possible to the surface. The problem is formulated as an LP with constraints at every point of a grid covering the area concerned, yielding a very large problem. The objective of the LP is to create as "good" a surface as possible. This formulation is new, as previous methods did not aim to minimise an objective function. If the desired surface has only slope limitations, the resulting drape surface must be constrained in the first derivative. Such a drape surface is readily constructed using the Lifting Algoritlun. It is shown that the Litling Algorithm is both exact and has great speed advantages. Some numerical results confinning exacmcss and speed are presented, as is the algorithm's analogy to a flow network method. An enhanced lifting method with a better order of complexity is also proposed and tested numerically. In most practical situations a drape surface is required which has both first and second derivatives constrained. If only a cut through such a surface is considered, the problem can be solved with relative ease by exploiting its nctwork~Jike structure. This method fonns the basis of one of the preferred heuristics developed later. It was not possible to generalise this method to a full two~dimensional drape surface. A commercially available LP package fares better in finding the optimal solution. Several heuristic methods were examined. first a general heuristic method based on a lifting approach was developed. This was followed by a method using repeated application of the method used for sections (the Alternating One-dimensional Dual Algorithm ["AODA"]). Three heuristics based on thimbles were also designed. Thimbles are caps whose first and second derivatives are acceptable and which are placed over local infeasibilities in the topography The work ends with a chapter comparing the efficiency of various heuristics and comparing the results obtained using a number of test datasets. It was fOLmd that heuristic methods provide acceptable drape surfaces and that the choice lies between speed and accuracy, with a previously designed smoothing method being the fastesl and the AODA the most accurate and quick enough. === Operations Research === D.Phil.
author2 Wolvaardt, J.S.
author_facet Wolvaardt, J.S.
Fossati, Reiner Justin
author Fossati, Reiner Justin
author_sort Fossati, Reiner Justin
title The construction of optimal drape surfaces with constrained first and second derivatives
title_short The construction of optimal drape surfaces with constrained first and second derivatives
title_full The construction of optimal drape surfaces with constrained first and second derivatives
title_fullStr The construction of optimal drape surfaces with constrained first and second derivatives
title_full_unstemmed The construction of optimal drape surfaces with constrained first and second derivatives
title_sort construction of optimal drape surfaces with constrained first and second derivatives
publishDate 2009
url http://hdl.handle.net/10500/1541
work_keys_str_mv AT fossatireinerjustin theconstructionofoptimaldrapesurfaceswithconstrainedfirstandsecondderivatives
AT fossatireinerjustin constructionofoptimaldrapesurfaceswithconstrainedfirstandsecondderivatives
_version_ 1718223552361005056