Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata.
Decision-making, accepted to be an important part of executive function, is inherent in all complex human experiences requiring intact brain functioning. Three different types of decision making have been identified: actor-centred, emotion-based and veridical decisionmaking. All require goal-sett...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | en |
Published: |
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10539/12250 |
id |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-12250 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-122502019-05-11T03:41:20Z Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata. Buchanan, Christine Brain damage--Patients--Psychological testing. Decision-making. Decision-making, accepted to be an important part of executive function, is inherent in all complex human experiences requiring intact brain functioning. Three different types of decision making have been identified: actor-centred, emotion-based and veridical decisionmaking. All require goal-setting, planning and execution, which are often impaired after sustaining an acquired brain injury (ABI). The Cognitive Reserve Hypothesis (CRH) holds that a larger brain belonging to an individual with a higher IQ and better education will be more resilient to injury. The principal aim of this study was to investigate performance differences in neuropsychological tests of decision-making between individuals with ABI from different socioeconomic status (SES). It was hypothesised that ABI would exacerbate differences in decisionmaking performance between individuals from a higher SES and those from low SES in terms of the CRH. Participants (n=25) had all sustained an ABI. Actor-centred, emotion-based and veridical decision-making were investigated using the Tinker Toy Test (TTT), the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and the Berg Card Sorting Task (BCST) respectively. Participants were asked to complete an SES Questionnaire. The independent variables were markers of SES: Race, Level of Education, Quality of Education, and Quality of Medical Care at time of injury. Differences in quality of education were significant for the BCST, suggesting that a poor quality of education has a negative impact on veridical decision-making after ABI. Poor education (a marker of low SES) does not provide the same buffering effect for insults to the brain in the event of an ABI as does superior education (a marker of high SES). 2013-01-07T09:53:08Z 2013-01-07T09:53:08Z 2013-01-07 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10539/12250 en application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Brain damage--Patients--Psychological testing. Decision-making. |
spellingShingle |
Brain damage--Patients--Psychological testing. Decision-making. Buchanan, Christine Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata. |
description |
Decision-making, accepted to be an important part of executive function, is inherent in
all complex human experiences requiring intact brain functioning. Three different types of
decision making have been identified: actor-centred, emotion-based and veridical decisionmaking.
All require goal-setting, planning and execution, which are often impaired after
sustaining an acquired brain injury (ABI). The Cognitive Reserve Hypothesis (CRH) holds that a
larger brain belonging to an individual with a higher IQ and better education will be more
resilient to injury. The principal aim of this study was to investigate performance differences in
neuropsychological tests of decision-making between individuals with ABI from different socioeconomic
status (SES). It was hypothesised that ABI would exacerbate differences in decisionmaking
performance between individuals from a higher SES and those from low SES in terms of
the CRH.
Participants (n=25) had all sustained an ABI. Actor-centred, emotion-based and
veridical decision-making were investigated using the Tinker Toy Test (TTT), the Iowa
Gambling Task (IGT) and the Berg Card Sorting Task (BCST) respectively. Participants were
asked to complete an SES Questionnaire. The independent variables were markers of SES: Race,
Level of Education, Quality of Education, and Quality of Medical Care at time of injury.
Differences in quality of education were significant for the BCST, suggesting that a poor
quality of education has a negative impact on veridical decision-making after ABI. Poor
education (a marker of low SES) does not provide the same buffering effect for insults to the
brain in the event of an ABI as does superior education (a marker of high SES). |
author |
Buchanan, Christine |
author_facet |
Buchanan, Christine |
author_sort |
Buchanan, Christine |
title |
Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata. |
title_short |
Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata. |
title_full |
Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata. |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata. |
title_sort |
comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata. |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10539/12250 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT buchananchristine comparisonofdecisionmakingstylesinindividualswithacquiredbraininjuryfromdifferentsocioeconomicstrata |
_version_ |
1719083353754304512 |