Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata.

Decision-making, accepted to be an important part of executive function, is inherent in all complex human experiences requiring intact brain functioning. Three different types of decision making have been identified: actor-centred, emotion-based and veridical decisionmaking. All require goal-sett...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Buchanan, Christine
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10539/12250
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-12250
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-122502019-05-11T03:41:20Z Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata. Buchanan, Christine Brain damage--Patients--Psychological testing. Decision-making. Decision-making, accepted to be an important part of executive function, is inherent in all complex human experiences requiring intact brain functioning. Three different types of decision making have been identified: actor-centred, emotion-based and veridical decisionmaking. All require goal-setting, planning and execution, which are often impaired after sustaining an acquired brain injury (ABI). The Cognitive Reserve Hypothesis (CRH) holds that a larger brain belonging to an individual with a higher IQ and better education will be more resilient to injury. The principal aim of this study was to investigate performance differences in neuropsychological tests of decision-making between individuals with ABI from different socioeconomic status (SES). It was hypothesised that ABI would exacerbate differences in decisionmaking performance between individuals from a higher SES and those from low SES in terms of the CRH. Participants (n=25) had all sustained an ABI. Actor-centred, emotion-based and veridical decision-making were investigated using the Tinker Toy Test (TTT), the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and the Berg Card Sorting Task (BCST) respectively. Participants were asked to complete an SES Questionnaire. The independent variables were markers of SES: Race, Level of Education, Quality of Education, and Quality of Medical Care at time of injury. Differences in quality of education were significant for the BCST, suggesting that a poor quality of education has a negative impact on veridical decision-making after ABI. Poor education (a marker of low SES) does not provide the same buffering effect for insults to the brain in the event of an ABI as does superior education (a marker of high SES). 2013-01-07T09:53:08Z 2013-01-07T09:53:08Z 2013-01-07 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10539/12250 en application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Brain damage--Patients--Psychological testing.
Decision-making.
spellingShingle Brain damage--Patients--Psychological testing.
Decision-making.
Buchanan, Christine
Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata.
description Decision-making, accepted to be an important part of executive function, is inherent in all complex human experiences requiring intact brain functioning. Three different types of decision making have been identified: actor-centred, emotion-based and veridical decisionmaking. All require goal-setting, planning and execution, which are often impaired after sustaining an acquired brain injury (ABI). The Cognitive Reserve Hypothesis (CRH) holds that a larger brain belonging to an individual with a higher IQ and better education will be more resilient to injury. The principal aim of this study was to investigate performance differences in neuropsychological tests of decision-making between individuals with ABI from different socioeconomic status (SES). It was hypothesised that ABI would exacerbate differences in decisionmaking performance between individuals from a higher SES and those from low SES in terms of the CRH. Participants (n=25) had all sustained an ABI. Actor-centred, emotion-based and veridical decision-making were investigated using the Tinker Toy Test (TTT), the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) and the Berg Card Sorting Task (BCST) respectively. Participants were asked to complete an SES Questionnaire. The independent variables were markers of SES: Race, Level of Education, Quality of Education, and Quality of Medical Care at time of injury. Differences in quality of education were significant for the BCST, suggesting that a poor quality of education has a negative impact on veridical decision-making after ABI. Poor education (a marker of low SES) does not provide the same buffering effect for insults to the brain in the event of an ABI as does superior education (a marker of high SES).
author Buchanan, Christine
author_facet Buchanan, Christine
author_sort Buchanan, Christine
title Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata.
title_short Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata.
title_full Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata.
title_fullStr Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata.
title_sort comparison of decision-making styles in individuals with acquired brain injury from different socio-economic strata.
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10539/12250
work_keys_str_mv AT buchananchristine comparisonofdecisionmakingstylesinindividualswithacquiredbraininjuryfromdifferentsocioeconomicstrata
_version_ 1719083353754304512