Smear layer removal ability and antibacterial activity of endodontic irrigants

A research report submitted to the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Dentistry Johannesburg, 2013 === The aim of this study was to test various alternating sequences of sodiu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bennie, Karen Ruet
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net10539/13950
id ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-13950
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-netd.ac.za-oai-union.ndltd.org-wits-oai-wiredspace.wits.ac.za-10539-139502019-05-11T03:41:20Z Smear layer removal ability and antibacterial activity of endodontic irrigants Bennie, Karen Ruet Smear Layer Endodontics A research report submitted to the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Dentistry Johannesburg, 2013 The aim of this study was to test various alternating sequences of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), anolyte solution, and EDTA for their ability to remove the mineralised portion of the smear layer, and to destroy bacteria. Forty-eight single canal teeth were collected and randomly divided into six groups, prepared to working length, sterilized and inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis. The irrigation protocols were as follows: Group 1 (four roots) 3ml sterile distilled water, Group 2 (four roots) 3ml 6% sodium hypochlorite, Group 3 (ten roots) 3ml 6% sodium hypochlorite followed by 3ml 18% EDTA, Group 4 (ten roots) 3ml 6% sodium hypochlorite followed by 5ml anolyte solution, Group 5 (ten roots) 0.5ml 6% sodium hypochlorite followed by 5ml anolyte solution followed by 3ml 18% EDTA and Group 6 (ten roots) 5ml anolyte solution followed by 3ml 18% EDTA. Sterile paper points were inserted into the canals after sterilization, inoculation and irrigation. Standard cultivation techniques were used to count the colony forming units of viable bacteria at each phase. The roots were split longitudinally and prepared for SEM evaluation. Two photomicrographs were randomly taken in the coronal, middle and iv apical thirds of each root and the number of patent dentinal tubules counted. The One-way ANOVA was used for statistical evaluation. The small sample size limited definitive conclusions but the results indicated that the coronal thirds of the roots showed better smear layer removal than the apical thirds, Sodium hypochlorite followed by EDTA showed the best smear layer removal. The various sequences of NaOCl, anolyte solution, and EDTA all had similar antibacterial results. 2014-02-25T13:12:23Z 2014-02-25T13:12:23Z 2014-02-25 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net10539/13950 en application/pdf
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Smear Layer
Endodontics
spellingShingle Smear Layer
Endodontics
Bennie, Karen Ruet
Smear layer removal ability and antibacterial activity of endodontic irrigants
description A research report submitted to the Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Dentistry Johannesburg, 2013 === The aim of this study was to test various alternating sequences of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), anolyte solution, and EDTA for their ability to remove the mineralised portion of the smear layer, and to destroy bacteria. Forty-eight single canal teeth were collected and randomly divided into six groups, prepared to working length, sterilized and inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis. The irrigation protocols were as follows: Group 1 (four roots) 3ml sterile distilled water, Group 2 (four roots) 3ml 6% sodium hypochlorite, Group 3 (ten roots) 3ml 6% sodium hypochlorite followed by 3ml 18% EDTA, Group 4 (ten roots) 3ml 6% sodium hypochlorite followed by 5ml anolyte solution, Group 5 (ten roots) 0.5ml 6% sodium hypochlorite followed by 5ml anolyte solution followed by 3ml 18% EDTA and Group 6 (ten roots) 5ml anolyte solution followed by 3ml 18% EDTA. Sterile paper points were inserted into the canals after sterilization, inoculation and irrigation. Standard cultivation techniques were used to count the colony forming units of viable bacteria at each phase. The roots were split longitudinally and prepared for SEM evaluation. Two photomicrographs were randomly taken in the coronal, middle and iv apical thirds of each root and the number of patent dentinal tubules counted. The One-way ANOVA was used for statistical evaluation. The small sample size limited definitive conclusions but the results indicated that the coronal thirds of the roots showed better smear layer removal than the apical thirds, Sodium hypochlorite followed by EDTA showed the best smear layer removal. The various sequences of NaOCl, anolyte solution, and EDTA all had similar antibacterial results.
author Bennie, Karen Ruet
author_facet Bennie, Karen Ruet
author_sort Bennie, Karen Ruet
title Smear layer removal ability and antibacterial activity of endodontic irrigants
title_short Smear layer removal ability and antibacterial activity of endodontic irrigants
title_full Smear layer removal ability and antibacterial activity of endodontic irrigants
title_fullStr Smear layer removal ability and antibacterial activity of endodontic irrigants
title_full_unstemmed Smear layer removal ability and antibacterial activity of endodontic irrigants
title_sort smear layer removal ability and antibacterial activity of endodontic irrigants
publishDate 2014
url http://hdl.handle.net10539/13950
work_keys_str_mv AT benniekarenruet smearlayerremovalabilityandantibacterialactivityofendodonticirrigants
_version_ 1719083388701245440