Alternate dispute resolution.
In an effort to save taxpayer dollars and ease an overburdened administrative and judicial court system, this report presents evidence to encourage the use of alternate dispute resolution (ADR) in construction contracting within the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Information is presented d...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
2013
|
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10945/25663 |
id |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-25663 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-256632014-11-27T16:15:58Z Alternate dispute resolution. Webb, Paul F. Engineering In an effort to save taxpayer dollars and ease an overburdened administrative and judicial court system, this report presents evidence to encourage the use of alternate dispute resolution (ADR) in construction contracting within the Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Information is presented detailing the primary factors that contribute to this expensive and overburdened system, including: costs associated with litigation, contractual document formation, experience level ofjunior project managers, and adversarial relationships that tend to develop between government agencies and construction contractors. Research on court cases and associated cost data was limited by geographical region, specifically, the Southern Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Charleston, South Carolina. Also included is related information from the Department of Defense administrative hearing agency, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. 2013-01-23T21:53:10Z 2013-01-23T21:53:10Z 1994-07 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/25663 ocn640616460 en_US This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, it may not be copyrighted. Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
en_US |
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
In an effort to save taxpayer dollars and ease an overburdened
administrative and judicial court system, this report presents evidence to encourage
the use of alternate dispute resolution (ADR) in construction contracting within the
Naval Facilities Engineering Command. Information is presented detailing the
primary factors that contribute to this expensive and overburdened system,
including: costs associated with litigation, contractual document formation,
experience level ofjunior project managers, and adversarial relationships that tend
to develop between government agencies and construction contractors.
Research on court cases and associated cost data was limited by
geographical region, specifically, the Southern Division, Naval Facilities
Engineering Command, Charleston, South Carolina. Also included is related
information from the Department of Defense administrative hearing agency, the
Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals. |
author2 |
Engineering |
author_facet |
Engineering Webb, Paul F. |
author |
Webb, Paul F. |
spellingShingle |
Webb, Paul F. Alternate dispute resolution. |
author_sort |
Webb, Paul F. |
title |
Alternate dispute resolution. |
title_short |
Alternate dispute resolution. |
title_full |
Alternate dispute resolution. |
title_fullStr |
Alternate dispute resolution. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Alternate dispute resolution. |
title_sort |
alternate dispute resolution. |
publisher |
Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10945/25663 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT webbpaulf alternatedisputeresolution |
_version_ |
1716724519955070977 |