A comparison study of CDMA versus TDMA/FDMA LEO satellite systems

In this thesis, two LEO satellite systems with different multiple access schemes are analyzed. The first system, GLOBALSTAR, uses CDMA. Equations are developed to calculate the maximum capacity of one satellite, of one satellite's user beam, and of the entire GLOBALSTAR system over CONUS. A det...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ciocco, Timothy Michael
Other Authors: Moose, Paul H.
Language:en_US
Published: Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School 2013
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/32142
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-32142
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-321422014-11-27T16:18:18Z A comparison study of CDMA versus TDMA/FDMA LEO satellite systems Ciocco, Timothy Michael Moose, Paul H. Robertson, R. Clark In this thesis, two LEO satellite systems with different multiple access schemes are analyzed. The first system, GLOBALSTAR, uses CDMA. Equations are developed to calculate the maximum capacity of one satellite, of one satellite's user beam, and of the entire GLOBALSTAR system over CONUS. A detailed description of GLOBALSTAR's outage probability, the probability that a call will be dropped from the system or blocked from connection with the system, is given and graphed against varying average call time and varying call arrival rate. The second system, IRIDIUM, uses TDMA/FDMA. Equations are similarly developed to calculate the maximum capacity of one satellite, of one satellite's user beam, and of the entire IRIDIUM system over CONUS. The probability of success or failure of an IRIDIUM subscriber obtaining a system channel is given by the Erlang Loss Formula and graphed against varying average call time and varying call arrival rate. Results show GLOBALSTAR provides five times the service capacity of IRIDIUM over CONUS and provides a better probability of obtaining a system channel for a call than will IRIDIUM. 2013-04-30T22:05:35Z 2013-04-30T22:05:35Z 1996-03 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/32142 en_US Approved for public release, distribution unlimited Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
description In this thesis, two LEO satellite systems with different multiple access schemes are analyzed. The first system, GLOBALSTAR, uses CDMA. Equations are developed to calculate the maximum capacity of one satellite, of one satellite's user beam, and of the entire GLOBALSTAR system over CONUS. A detailed description of GLOBALSTAR's outage probability, the probability that a call will be dropped from the system or blocked from connection with the system, is given and graphed against varying average call time and varying call arrival rate. The second system, IRIDIUM, uses TDMA/FDMA. Equations are similarly developed to calculate the maximum capacity of one satellite, of one satellite's user beam, and of the entire IRIDIUM system over CONUS. The probability of success or failure of an IRIDIUM subscriber obtaining a system channel is given by the Erlang Loss Formula and graphed against varying average call time and varying call arrival rate. Results show GLOBALSTAR provides five times the service capacity of IRIDIUM over CONUS and provides a better probability of obtaining a system channel for a call than will IRIDIUM.
author2 Moose, Paul H.
author_facet Moose, Paul H.
Ciocco, Timothy Michael
author Ciocco, Timothy Michael
spellingShingle Ciocco, Timothy Michael
A comparison study of CDMA versus TDMA/FDMA LEO satellite systems
author_sort Ciocco, Timothy Michael
title A comparison study of CDMA versus TDMA/FDMA LEO satellite systems
title_short A comparison study of CDMA versus TDMA/FDMA LEO satellite systems
title_full A comparison study of CDMA versus TDMA/FDMA LEO satellite systems
title_fullStr A comparison study of CDMA versus TDMA/FDMA LEO satellite systems
title_full_unstemmed A comparison study of CDMA versus TDMA/FDMA LEO satellite systems
title_sort comparison study of cdma versus tdma/fdma leo satellite systems
publisher Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2013
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/32142
work_keys_str_mv AT cioccotimothymichael acomparisonstudyofcdmaversustdmafdmaleosatellitesystems
AT cioccotimothymichael comparisonstudyofcdmaversustdmafdmaleosatellitesystems
_version_ 1716725303333617664