An analysis of item identification for additive manufacturing (3-D printing) within the Naval supply chain

Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === Additive manufacturing (AM) technology, known as three-dimensional (3-D) printing, was developed in the 1980s and has matured such that it is being implemented into modern business processes as a way to reduce prototype design and production...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morgan, Jason A., Prentiss, Jacob M.
Other Authors: Brinkley, Douglas E.
Published: Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School 2015
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/44623
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-44623
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-446232015-05-06T03:58:59Z An analysis of item identification for additive manufacturing (3-D printing) within the Naval supply chain Morgan, Jason A. Prentiss, Jacob M. Brinkley, Douglas E. Tick, Simona Graduate School of Business & Public Policy (GSBPP) Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited Additive manufacturing (AM) technology, known as three-dimensional (3-D) printing, was developed in the 1980s and has matured such that it is being implemented into modern business processes as a way to reduce prototype design and production lead times. Similar to companies in civilian industry, the U.S. Navy’s Chief of Naval Operations Rapid Innovation Development Cell has been looking for ways to introduce this technology into the Navy’s supply chain. The Navy is operating in a continuously shrinking, budget-constrained environment and always seeks ways to save money and improve business practices. Implementing AM into the Navy’s supply chain has the potential to reduce costs and improve acquisition processes. As the Navy continues to invest in AM, current inventories of material must be reviewed for applicability and compatibility to determine what is 3-D printable. This project’s goal is to provide decision support criteria by identifying influential factors that determine the applicability of 3-D printing alternatives. The approach taken involves an analysis of the technology, its use in civilian industries, and a discussion of influential factors determining whether 3-D printing is a alternative to traditional supply chains. Moreover, it identifies potential uses and provides examples for printing 3-D material for the Navy. 2015-02-18T00:17:59Z 2015-02-18T00:17:59Z 2014-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/44623 This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. Copyright protection is not available for this work in the United States. Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited === Additive manufacturing (AM) technology, known as three-dimensional (3-D) printing, was developed in the 1980s and has matured such that it is being implemented into modern business processes as a way to reduce prototype design and production lead times. Similar to companies in civilian industry, the U.S. Navy’s Chief of Naval Operations Rapid Innovation Development Cell has been looking for ways to introduce this technology into the Navy’s supply chain. The Navy is operating in a continuously shrinking, budget-constrained environment and always seeks ways to save money and improve business practices. Implementing AM into the Navy’s supply chain has the potential to reduce costs and improve acquisition processes. As the Navy continues to invest in AM, current inventories of material must be reviewed for applicability and compatibility to determine what is 3-D printable. This project’s goal is to provide decision support criteria by identifying influential factors that determine the applicability of 3-D printing alternatives. The approach taken involves an analysis of the technology, its use in civilian industries, and a discussion of influential factors determining whether 3-D printing is a alternative to traditional supply chains. Moreover, it identifies potential uses and provides examples for printing 3-D material for the Navy.
author2 Brinkley, Douglas E.
author_facet Brinkley, Douglas E.
Morgan, Jason A.
Prentiss, Jacob M.
author Morgan, Jason A.
Prentiss, Jacob M.
spellingShingle Morgan, Jason A.
Prentiss, Jacob M.
An analysis of item identification for additive manufacturing (3-D printing) within the Naval supply chain
author_sort Morgan, Jason A.
title An analysis of item identification for additive manufacturing (3-D printing) within the Naval supply chain
title_short An analysis of item identification for additive manufacturing (3-D printing) within the Naval supply chain
title_full An analysis of item identification for additive manufacturing (3-D printing) within the Naval supply chain
title_fullStr An analysis of item identification for additive manufacturing (3-D printing) within the Naval supply chain
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of item identification for additive manufacturing (3-D printing) within the Naval supply chain
title_sort analysis of item identification for additive manufacturing (3-d printing) within the naval supply chain
publisher Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/44623
work_keys_str_mv AT morganjasona ananalysisofitemidentificationforadditivemanufacturing3dprintingwithinthenavalsupplychain
AT prentissjacobm ananalysisofitemidentificationforadditivemanufacturing3dprintingwithinthenavalsupplychain
AT morganjasona analysisofitemidentificationforadditivemanufacturing3dprintingwithinthenavalsupplychain
AT prentissjacobm analysisofitemidentificationforadditivemanufacturing3dprintingwithinthenavalsupplychain
_version_ 1716803393344765952