Distributed and end-to-end testing.

Approved for public release, distribution unlimited === Many U.S. Navy systems were built on the fly and have encountered interoperability problems at sea, such as erroneous dual/multiple track designations, misidentification/track identity conflicts, report responsibility conflicts, friendly tracks...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Le, BeEm V.
Other Authors: Huynh, Thomas V.
Published: Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School 2012
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10945/4506
id ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-4506
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-nps.edu-oai-calhoun.nps.edu-10945-45062014-12-04T04:08:42Z Distributed and end-to-end testing. Le, BeEm V. Huynh, Thomas V. Barrera, Raymond Naval Postgraduate School (U.S.) Approved for public release, distribution unlimited Many U.S. Navy systems were built on the fly and have encountered interoperability problems at sea, such as erroneous dual/multiple track designations, misidentification/track identity conflicts, report responsibility conflicts, friendly tracks displayed as unknown/pending, tracks dropped without operator action, different track identities of at different ships, etc. To identify and fix these interoperability problems, the Navy instituted the Distributed Engineering Plant (DEP) testing program, run by the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), and the End-to-End (E2E) testing initiative, currently formed by the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR). Whereas the DEP involves many land-based aboratories across the U.S. connected via an Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) network, E2E testing is carried out entirely at one laboratory-the E2E lab. The DEP testing program is faced with the problem of determining a cost-effective way of paying for testing-providing the participant DEP laboratories full-time funding or paying them on a per-test basis. A challenge faced by the E2E testing program is getting the E2E lab ready for testing. Two factors contributing to this challenge are uncertain availability of funding for building the E2E lab and the lack of a comprehensive plan to establish the E2E lab. Such a plan calls for a rigorous justification of the E2E lab needs and hence funding requirements. This thesis performs an in-depth examination and a qualitative analysis of the two testing programs and a quantitative comparative analysis of the DEP testing program's paying options and, using goal programming, provides data in support of creating an E2E lab plan. The significance of this thesis is the use of analysis and mathematical programming to provide analytical data in supporting informed decision making in testing and evaluation of systems and/or systems of systems. 2012-03-14T17:42:07Z 2012-03-14T17:42:07Z 2009-12 Thesis http://hdl.handle.net/10945/4506 502439197 Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
collection NDLTD
sources NDLTD
description Approved for public release, distribution unlimited === Many U.S. Navy systems were built on the fly and have encountered interoperability problems at sea, such as erroneous dual/multiple track designations, misidentification/track identity conflicts, report responsibility conflicts, friendly tracks displayed as unknown/pending, tracks dropped without operator action, different track identities of at different ships, etc. To identify and fix these interoperability problems, the Navy instituted the Distributed Engineering Plant (DEP) testing program, run by the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), and the End-to-End (E2E) testing initiative, currently formed by the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Command (SPAWAR). Whereas the DEP involves many land-based aboratories across the U.S. connected via an Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) network, E2E testing is carried out entirely at one laboratory-the E2E lab. The DEP testing program is faced with the problem of determining a cost-effective way of paying for testing-providing the participant DEP laboratories full-time funding or paying them on a per-test basis. A challenge faced by the E2E testing program is getting the E2E lab ready for testing. Two factors contributing to this challenge are uncertain availability of funding for building the E2E lab and the lack of a comprehensive plan to establish the E2E lab. Such a plan calls for a rigorous justification of the E2E lab needs and hence funding requirements. This thesis performs an in-depth examination and a qualitative analysis of the two testing programs and a quantitative comparative analysis of the DEP testing program's paying options and, using goal programming, provides data in support of creating an E2E lab plan. The significance of this thesis is the use of analysis and mathematical programming to provide analytical data in supporting informed decision making in testing and evaluation of systems and/or systems of systems.
author2 Huynh, Thomas V.
author_facet Huynh, Thomas V.
Le, BeEm V.
author Le, BeEm V.
spellingShingle Le, BeEm V.
Distributed and end-to-end testing.
author_sort Le, BeEm V.
title Distributed and end-to-end testing.
title_short Distributed and end-to-end testing.
title_full Distributed and end-to-end testing.
title_fullStr Distributed and end-to-end testing.
title_full_unstemmed Distributed and end-to-end testing.
title_sort distributed and end-to-end testing.
publisher Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School
publishDate 2012
url http://hdl.handle.net/10945/4506
work_keys_str_mv AT lebeemv distributedandendtoendtesting
_version_ 1716726277342232576